klang
klang
Of course. All good!didn’t mean to band-splain. Sorry
Of course. All good!didn’t mean to band-splain. Sorry
Nothing to do with your person, but before I started to make a bit of money off music I did some horrible jobs. I didn't mind as I didn't see them as my lot but as means to finance my hobby.One of the best music makers I know, who made one of my favourite LPs of last year, is currently working as that bloke who sits on a cold concrete bench every day and click- counts the people walking past. Miserable. It makes me sad for him too. I hate that he has to do it.)
I'm questioning this. You can do a live performance on TikTok (which is very good at promoting live performances, if bad at paying you for them) without all the background noise and if anything more audience interaction via the chat.
A live gig at a proper venue has the advantage of visceral audience collective participation, dancing, moshing etc. But a lot of music just isn't about that. And occasionally a band will be able to envelope the audience in sound in a way that would never work over the Internet or via recorded music, but I think that's very rare. Some bands can put on a really good show, visually as well as musically. But again that's rare and probably expensive.
Nothing to do with your person, but before I started to make a bit of money off music I did some horrible jobs. I didn't mind as I didn't see them as my lot but as means to finance my hobby.
I'd find it very difficult to go back to it being 'just' my hobby.This one is constitutionally morose , so it hurts him in existential ways.
And he knows how good he is. And he’s getting older.
I think he doesn’t and wouldn’t and couldn’t see it as his hobby. In fact, I can imagine that if I said it to him he’d feel insulted.
On the other hand, I’ve heard others say it just as you do.
People are different to each other. Shocking.
Also, whatever gets you through the night, it’s alright.
I'd find it very difficult to go back to it being 'just' my hobby.
I got a job to make music for a king running TV show which served as a spring board. I had the time to fine-tune my skills and earned enough money to live and invest in gear etc.This is an aside but I’m curious…
Could you identify the threshold of that change?
What release or gig or achievement was the point of change for you?
Here's a video by a fella called Andy Edwards, he's a rock/jazz drummer, former college educator, former dance music producer. And now he's a youtuber. He's not necessarily talking sense but he has some music industry credentials.
Very briefly. The future isn't in record deals and live gigs like it used to be. It's in social media and content creation. And the latter should be the focus of artists, not a promotional side project.
Anyway. Discuss!
I’m watching this now.
This guy doesn’t know what the fuck he’s talking about.
He’s out of touch and he has a very narrow perspective.
He spends quite a lot of time showing off his huge private space filled with expensive equipment.
The rest of his channel suggests he’s not listening to any new music. He probably has no idea about who’s making new music and playing it live in his nearest town.
Can you expand on the narrow perspective point?
I've been to one BIG gig in my entire life and that was last year seeing Raye. It was good but I'd be happier with something more intimate. I am very rarely interest in big names anyway.
I rarely go to gigs these days. The last really good one was a couple of performances of Eliane Radigue's ultra minimalist drone pieces. That wouldn't have worked well online because it was all about the resonances and the overtones. But most music is not like that.
On the other hand I watch live performances by a guy called Coco Capitaine Poulet and he's just some Fench guy who is music teacher and he plays the ukulele and sings little songs and it's magical. Trying to listen to him live in the flesh with people nattering and crashing about would be awful. He's not loud. He doesn't dominate a space. But I don't have to put up with having to be in a room with bloody humans because of social media. Plus I don't have to travel to France etc. Plus I would never have found him in the first place.
As a consumer of music, I think this new order is generally for the best.
People do listen to music, especially the quiet shows.
Could have heard a pin drop in the room last night.
A young RnR crowd, all silent.
It’s true that cheap coke has made for a lot of chatter and we’ve been discussing that in another thread.
And different venues draw different crowds. Some house crowds are very music literate and are mostly there for the music, while others, not so much.
The thing is why risk being in a room listening to something like that when the best case scenario is that it's almost as good as listening online where you can have no distractions whatsoever? Plus all the clart and expense of getting to the venue in the first place.
The thing is why risk being in a room listening to something like that when the best case scenario is that it's almost as good as listening online where you can have no distractions whatsoever? Plus all the clart and expense of getting to the venue in the first place.
When he says if you’re in a band and you get signed, you’re not running things you’re the customer… No, the band is the product. The musician is the product.
There is also a fortune to be made in merch.Well, I’m very unlikely to watch it, but that sounds very depressing. But I know that unless you’re a HUGE name you can’t live on music sales or gig revenue.
But “content creation”. Yuch. I wouldn’t want to be in that business.
Yup, I know a musician in a well-known (in Scotland) band who says his job is t-shirt sales.There is also a fortune to be made in merch.
It’s happened already.
I think the decline in bands has been well publicised - high costs of studio space, touring, harder to make money from sales because nobody buys music, streaming royalties are massively skewed so not much for anyone outside the very top.
In electronic music it’s been a joke for a few years that the DJs breaking through are the ones who look nice and post endless stupid dancing videos on social. It’s very hard to stay relevant without doing social it seems. So it’s no longer about the music or skills but how good your social promo is in terms of getting bookings and getting your music heard.
In theory it’s never been easier to find an audience without needing big labels or big set up costs - via social and streaming - but the reality is the lower barrier to entry means there are a gazillion new tracks and new artists every day, so actually cutting through is very hard.
Icing on the cake is the old labels are now in leagues with the new gatekeepers - social and streaming services - to get promoted and play listed etc which is the only way people listen now.
Oh and of course we have AI produced music now…
There is also a fortune to be made in merch.
My concern is AI. A whole album has already been made an released by AI which is not for me.
Yup, I know a musician in a well-known (in Scotland) band who says his job is t-shirt sales.
That video article is about no more bands in the charts. That’s true. But the charts have been increasingly anachronistic for a while
That’s a natural progression of marketing and capitalism. Music being commodified and sold back to the public. It’s inevitable that the charts become less about the music and more about the bottom line (after all they were set up to reflect sales, originally as a measure of popularity but that metric is no longer useful).
These days the charts don’t have anything to do with music made by musicians and playing tours (I’m not talking about Taylor and Bey and Billie). The charts don’t have anything to say about the music that most people who love music seek out. They reflect the kind of music we see and hear in films, adverts, in the background of TV shows. That part of the music industry is churning away like all the other parts of the machine, seeking ever more eye catching candy-sweet ways to catch the attention of dopamine addicts.
What are we taking about here? On this thread. Are we talking about musicians trying to make a living making music? Or are we talking about organisations, labels, the industry trying to make money out of music?
It’s a really clear distinction.
I’m talking about the musicians and the bands. If we’re talking about the industry, I’m less interested in chatting about it. I just watch that from the sidelines.
Machine gonna machine .
I'm fascinated by signcrushesmotorist (this is just 1 of about 20 or so project names he has)... he started a couple of years ago, 17 yr old kid from belfast... he is massively prolific, churning out album after album of slow core (v lofi melancholy guitar songs), all v short songs, on spotify and youtube... all under different names... but somehow the algorhythm loves it, he is getting 10s of millions of views. also v popular on tiktok/instagram as reel soundtracks. he's now moved to the states and has produced an album by a famous rapper. I dont understand how it works!!! but it does work for him.
yeh, tho that thread is more a reflection of the demographic here rather than unknown artists, mostly! like Kodak black was the 1st mention haHe’s not the only person making music in the socials and ignoring the normal routes..
That thread on here about musicians (especially rap/hip hop) getting millions of views.