I severely doubt that.the venues will still be there
I severely doubt that.the venues will still be there
Fewer gigs though, no doubt. A handful instead of consistent.It is lovely for you that your principles allow you to get £200 for a gig instead of less.
the venues are increasingly not thereAgain, the venues will still be there, the audiences will still be there.
PLEASE STOP TALKINGFewer gigs though, no doubt. A handful instead of consistent.
I genuinely don’t understand what I’ve done to upset you, but fine.PLEASE STOP TALKING
I severely doubt that.
the venues are increasingly not there
You don't seem to recognise what a privileged position you are in, and then you also say that the privileged position you are in is because of your "principles". It is a proper wind up.I genuinely don’t understand what I’ve done to upset you, but fine.
Yeah, I hate to think what's going to be left. I'm out of the loop with this stuff nowadays but when I think of the places I used to help out at, do spoken word things at, etc, many of them had already gone due to the disappearance of squat venues from the UK, hiking of rates and rents, etc, and many more will be gone now. It's bleak.I don't know how else you'd describe the potential disappearance of a whole range of live shows at a place you can practically get to as not being culturally detrimental. whether it's discovering a support band, new comedian, theatre. I'm on the internet pretty much all day but you can't beat seeing a live gig, chatting to your mates about it, laughing with other people etc.
I think you think we got a lot more than we got. We managed to do something serious about once a month (and things for free in between as promotion). It’s hardly being Coldplay.You don't seem to recognise what a privileged position you are in, and then you also say that the privileged position you are in is because of your "principles". It is a proper wind up.
NO, that is not the privileged position I am talking about.I think you think we got a lot more than we got. We managed to do something serious about once a month (and things for free in between as promotion). It’s hardly being Coldplay.
I haven't had a chance to read the whole thread, perhaps somebody's beaten me to this, but 17,410,742 people voted for Brexit.52% isn't a "VERY LARGE PERCENTAGE" in anyone's book, come on MickiQ !
That's very true and something I forgot about. I have definitely been treated well in Germany (and other places in Europe) because of this and at first wondered how they made it work.Just to note that a lot of the 'diy' and 'self organised' venues in small and mid sized towns in Germany mentioned upthread are subsidised by councils. Eg a venue is provided by the council, rent is covered and an operational budget is agreed on. Some might have social workers onsite, but the running of the venue is left to the users.
Governments taking responsibility for the development of the smaller scale arts can pay off. I don't see much of that in the UK atm.
Yes because they blatantly weren't paying rent out of the money they made from our shows haThat's very true and something I forgot about. I have definitely been treated well in Germany (and other places in Europe) because of this and at first wondered how they made it work.
That's very true.cheaper though, mind.
and more backstage
for the band
this is the thing - generally on these kinds of threads people will also be critical of venues, saying they should pay musicians more etc etc when for the most part, the venues that are left are already having to subsidise bands playing original material from other stuff they're doing (covers bands, zumba classes, etc).Yes because they blatantly weren't paying rent out of the money they made from our shows ha
Yes true.Yes because they blatantly weren't paying rent out of the money they made from our shows ha
pretty sure that was gangster shit (not joking).Yes true.
What was the deal with that weird place in Italy that seemed to be rolling in money?
I guess I shouldn't name names but yes, that 'one' (not all of them). They came out of nowhere, never seen them before and a very different 'vibe' from everyone else that seemed to be running the venue. Scary stuff.organised crime also ran that venue in tokyo right?
A day job is a day job. Can't be fussy.So yeh that is one route we could go I guess.... popular music has a long and noble tradition of being interlinked with organised crime.
Gucci Mane always used to be on about how he didn't need any money from music, he made his wedge on the streets and used that to pay for the fun time in the studio, and I'm sure that was true for him at the start.... rap music is just being honest and direct about how the system works, as always.A day job is a day job. Can't be fussy.
from the likes of frank sinatra on one side of the law while elvis presley was on the otherSo yeh that is one route we could go I guess.... popular music has a long and noble tradition of being interlinked with organised crime.
...and ironically the clash being on the "already rich" side rather than fighting the law.from the likes of frank sinatra on one side of the law while elvis presley was on the other
coming back to the German model - these venues don't rely on bands bringing in punters. People come to hang out anyway, if there is a band playing they like it's just an extra bonus.this is the thing - generally on these kinds of threads people will also be critical of venues, saying they should pay musicians more etc etc when for the most part, the venues that are left are already having to subsidise bands playing original material from other stuff they're doing (covers bands, zumba classes, etc).
There is a very large gap between the reality of the live music scene and most people's perceptions of it.
sponsorships / endorsements.No please don't name names!
It is a big point tho really, the sums just don't add up for a lot of music event stuff, the equipment etc is too expensive. So it's either already-rich people, government funding, or crime.
yeh well i suppose it's easier to turn rebellion into money when you start off with a bit of dosh...and ironically the clash being on the "already rich" side rather than fighting the law.
In the case of the 'tokyo' place it was supposedly money laundering and a 'hidden' part of the venue (upstairs I think) being a base of operations.No please don't name names!
It is a big point tho really, the sums just don't add up for a lot of music event stuff, the equipment etc is too expensive. So it's either already-rich people, government funding, or crime.