PR1Berske
Alligator in chains by the park gates.
He's saying that the strikes are damaging his business, so of course he's attacking the unions.Did you even read the article? He was criticising the government, NOT the unions.
He's saying that the strikes are damaging his business, so of course he's attacking the unions.Did you even read the article? He was criticising the government, NOT the unions.
Don't be ridiculous. Read the fucking article.He's saying that the strikes are damaging his business, so of course he's attacking the unions.
There's really not that much to go on in the linked article, tbh, but urging the Government to "get a grip" could certainly be read as code for calling for some 'strong arm' tactics against the strikes. Sounds like a carefully worded attack on organised labour that can't be seen to be directly so; weaselly little man.Don't be ridiculous. Read the fucking article.
Don't ever swear at me again.Don't be ridiculous. Read the fucking article.
fuck offDon't ever swear at me again.
Could you quote the negative words against the unions?Just did, didn’t see a single negative word against the government, just a demand they ‘get a grip’ on the strikes.
It could just as easily be read as calling for the government to give the union what they demand. Unless you can quote exactly what he is saying against the unions.There's really not that much to go on in the linked article, tbh, but urging the Government to "get a grip" could certainly be read as code for calling for some 'strong arm' tactics against the strikes. Sounds like a carefully worded attack on organised labour that can't be seen to be directly so; weaselly little man.
Don't ever swear at me again.
Are you gaslighting or just thick?Could you quote the negative words against the unions?
Shall I take that as a No, you can't quote any negativity against the unions?Are you gaslighting or just thick?
He doesn't say pay them, does he? No indication that the unions are, y'know, right.Shall I take that as a No, you can't quote any negativity against the unions?
Or what?Don't ever swear at me again.
Brewdog - they disrespect women who work for them, the beers are awful, their adverts are misogynistic, and their Urban fans are pig-headed bores …
As you've quoted me I'll add that the article proves they're anti-Union, and once upon a time Urban would have found that disagreeable.But apart from that …
As you've quoted me I'll add that the article proves they're anti-Union, and once upon a time Urban would have found that disagreeable.
Some of their beers are really nice thoughBrewdog - they disrespect women who work for them, the beers are awful, their adverts are misogynistic, and their Urban fans are pig-headed bores.
Thread ignored. Enjoy your Punk IPA.
This is the worst way to stop people swearing at you. Cat cunt.
Could you quote any positive words supporting the union? I can certainly show you this Union claim Brewdog snubbed attempts to engage in discussions amid worker concernsCould you quote the negative words against the unions?
Yet, somehow, not a single word of support for the strike action can be found in his comments. But if you're insisting that he's actually pro strike, could you find some examples of him giving his full backing to a strike that directly affects his business in the past?It could just as easily be read as calling for the government to give the union what they demand. Unless you can quote exactly what he is saying against the unions.
Where have I insisted that he's pro-strike?Yet, somehow, not a single word of support for the strike action can be found in his comments. But if you're insisting that he's actually pro strike, could you find some examples of him giving his full backing to a strike that directly affects his business in the past?
And then there's this Trouble’s Brewing: Man Claims He Was Kicked Out of BrewDog Bar Over Union Leaflet | Novara Media
You're suggesting it right here:Where have I insisted that he's pro-strike?
It could just as easily be read as calling for the government to give the union what they demand.
Given the sheer volume of posts you've contributed suggesting that he's just a poor misunderstood pro union guy, I'd say my comment was entirely justified.You said I INSISTED he was pro-strike.
Oh, I see. So we're allowed to lie about what other people have said now? And ascribe opinions to people?Given the sheer volume of posts you've contributed suggesting that he's just a poor misunderstood pro union guy, I'd say my comment was entirely justified.
This is essentially the whole of this thread - it's a kind of therapy for the brewdog obsessives; lets them get some stuff off their chests and provides mild entertainment for the rest of us. A win-win situation - don't worry about it.Oh, I see. So we're allowed to lie about what other people have said now? And ascribe opinions to people?