Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Black Lives Matter demos and protests UK, 2020-2021

Someone posted a video of Nigel Marcham aka The Little Veteran on here a while ago (can't remember what thread it was on). In this video he was basically racially abusing some non-white protesters- telling them how british and white he was and telling them they were'nt british and to go back 'home to your own country'. However I can't find this video.

This racist, hateful little cunt is organising an anti-refugee action in Dover on the 5th September with assorted fascist and nazi loons. He's trying to unify the far-right.

If anyone can post a link to that video for me I'd really appreciate it. This obviously racist shit is claiming that he is not racist, has black relatives and is 'not far-right'.
 
Not directly related to BLM protests, but presumably inspired by them

City of London school changes name 'due to slavery links'
The only primary school in the City of London is to be renamed because of its links with a 17th Century merchant and proponent of slavery. Sir John Cass's Foundation Primary School will change its name to The Aldgate School for the new school year.
A bust and statue of Sir John Cass will also be removed. It comes as the City of London Corporation launched a consultation to review landmarks with historic links to racism and slavery.
 
This quote is from BBC analysis by James Landale in regards Barbados stating its intention to remove the queen as the head of state:

What is significant is that the prime minister of Barbados cast the decision as "leaving our colonial past behind".

In the context of the Black Lives Matter movement, it will be interesting to see if this sparks wider political pressure on other Caribbean governments to go the same way.

And if this happens, and the removal of the Queen as head of state is placed on a par with, say, the removal of a statue of a slave trader, then that could pose difficult questions for both the British royal family and the Commonwealth.

 
This quote is from BBC analysis by James Landale in regards Barbados stating its intention to remove the queen as the head of state:



Perhaps one day we'll leave our colonial past behind as we export the former people to the south atlantic industrial zone
 
This quote is from BBC analysis by James Landale in regards Barbados stating its intention to remove the queen as the head of state:



Well done Barbados. Though I think they should just remove her rather than replace her given she has fuck all to do with governing Barbados. Two of the commonest arguments in favour of the monarchy here are that a) she's just a notional head of state and doesn't actually get involved in politics and b) if we get rid of her we'll end up with President Blair don't really go together. Just get rid of having a head of state altogether if she doesn't actually do anything.
 
I wonder what effect this will have on their tax haven status?

from google

Barbados is not a pure tax haven, but it is a very low-tax environment for offshore corporations incorporated in Barbados. ... There are no withholding taxes or capital gains taxes. Unlike most Caribbean tax havens, Barbados does have double taxation treaties with a number of other countries, including Canada and the U.S.28 Jan 2020
 
The pete-trego wannabe with the scaffolding pole has had a busy year. January he was all over the internet for getting a mate to down not one, but two 70cl bottles of vodka (at work), june he's in national papers for inept-right-wing-salvage-historical inquiry, and yesterday he's coked up on top of the colston plinth all over local media.
Interesting thing here - do give a listen/watch. Only short.

Both rapper Wish Master and scaffolder Nigel Horlock gave speeches on the plinth where Edward Colston's statue once stood - but for very different reasons.

Just hours before the slave trader's statue had been pulled down amid a Black Lives Matter protest and then thrown in Bristol's harbour.

Both came together to talk about that monumental day in a bid to find common ground.
 
Last edited:
Don't agree with all this but it's a first shot from those involved thus far in preparing some form of political response (there have, of course, been ongoing legal stuff that it's better i don't mention here).

Stand with the Colston 4

This is both a political charge, and frankly a confusing one. Six people out of the thousands present on the day have already been offered ‘a conditional caution for the offence of causing criminal damage to property valued under £5,000.it was reported here. Yet these 4 face court for an apparently identical charge (we have not of course seen either the court papers, nor the police’s evidence). This makes the case a political one, by picking on just these 4 people, it is clear that the ‘powers that be’ – primarily the Tory Govt in London – want an example made, even if anyone found guilty is unlikely to face much more than a major fine (we hope), and they may well of course be found not guilty. They are innocent until the court case is over.

What happens now? The Colston 4 will no doubt be consulting with their solicitors, considering their options, and planning their defence, with the back-up from their legal support team. The first date set for their court hearing is 25 January. If just 10% of the 10,000 plus who were at the demo on 7th June turn up outside court to show their solidarity, it will send a clear message to the prosecutors & politicians. As we said back on 8th June – Solidarity with anyone persecuted for the removal of Colston. We all did it!


What happens now?
The Colston 4 will no doubt be consulting with their solicitors, considering their options, and planning their defence, with the back-up from their legal support team. The first date set for their court hearing is 25 January. If just 10% of the 10,000 plus who were at the demo on 7th June turn up outside court to show their solidarity, it will send a clear message to the prosecutors & politicians. As we said back on 8th June – Solidarity with anyone persecuted for the removal of Colston. We all did it!

The case will also be a political trial because it will keep in the spotlight both the Society of Merchant Venturers
, those cheerleaders for Colston and great beneficiaries of the slave-trade (see this article) – who continue to be protected by their power, wealth & networks; and of course Bristol’s Mayor Rees, who collaborated in the police investigation when Bristol Council gave the Police the necessary statement regards damage to the statue. Rees, who failed for 4 years to do anything about the hated statue (see part 3 here), but took down a sculpture of south Bristol’s Jen Reid in under 24 hours, has shown himself to be both unprincipled and corrupted by his own pursuit of power. He’ll be looking forwards to next May’s Mayoral election with trepidation.
 
As i said 6 months ago, this was always going to happen - that lovely A&S chief plod wasn't going to stand for his coppers being shown up as powerless when people stand together against them, and those on the ground certainly wouldn't and would have been making damn sure that he and those in his position were made aware of that. You also don't get to question the merchant venturers historical and ongoing record of murder and corruption publicly like this and you can bet they used every single ounce of pressure they could possibly apply behind the scenes to make this happen. And you certainly don't get to make the mayor look foolish.
 
An aside/pseuds corner point, but a tale of 2 statues:

There's an obvious tale to tell about the struggle to get the Mary Wollstonecraft statue. But as a piece of public/political art it turned out to be pretty awful.

maggi-hambling_photoshop-of-woman-installed-at-site-1-on-newington-green_cropped-23.jpg



Whereas the Jen Reid piece, touched on above, worked perfectly as simple representation with an obvious message. My guess is that if the statue had been of a 'safe'/historical anti-slavery campaigner it would be on the plinth now.

Jen Reid: 'I felt a surge of power. Colston is gone. Now there's a new girl in town' | Black Lives Matter movement | The Guardian
 
Extract from an email received yesterday

The Council is undertaking a review into the naming of local landmarks, buildings and public spaces to address the legacies of African enslavement and colonialism within the borough. The Council's Community Steering Group for the Naming Review decided that the name of Cass should be removed from the two park signs at the entrances of Cassland Road Gardens (the Gardens were named after Sir John Cass who was a Director of the Royal African Company, making substantial profit from the enslavement of African people). The removal of the signs, which took place on Sunday 6 December, was an important and symbolic step in ensuring the naming of the Borough's local landmarks, buildings and public spaces reflect its diverse communities. You can find out more about the project via Hackney Naming Hub.

1607856134984.png
 

Today, the 25 January 2021 four people, Rhian Graham, 29, Milo Ponsford, 25, Jake Skuse, 32, and Sage Willoughby, 21, will appear at Bristol Magistrates Court charged with causing criminal damage to the statue of Edward Colston in Bristol City Centre during a Black Lives Matter (BLM) protest on 7 June 2020. The BLM demonstration attracted thousands of protestors. These four young people were selected out of a crowd of hundreds who cheered as the statue of Edward Colston, a leading organiser and profiteer from the enslavement of African people, was dumped into the Floating Harbour. Whilst we do not endorse criminal damage, we do not support any prosecution as it is neither in the public nor Bristol’s interest in terms of where we are presently as a city. Non-prosecution would be a step towards reconciliation and healing.

There has been a century long history of dissent and protest in Bristol over the celebration and memorialisation of Edward Colston. The prominence given to the statue of Colston in the City Centre has been symbolic affront to many Bristolians. Despite protests and petitions over more than three decades, and particularly over the last five years, Bristol City Council (BCC) has largely failed to listen to people’s concerns over idolising a slave trader in the centre of our city.

Instead in 2018 Bristol City Council redeveloped the statue’s setting, spending millions of pounds on its location which had the effect of making the slave trader’s sculpture even more prominent. The failure to address the concerns and feelings of Bristolians, particularly of African-Caribbean heritage, led to the statue being repeatedly ‘damaged’ by the application of unofficial history plaques, posters, graffiti and props telling ‘the truth’ about Edward Colston. In each case the statue was speedily repaired by BCC.

In 2017, as public institutions such as schools and concert halls began to remove the ‘toxic brand’ of Edward Colston the question of the statue became prominent. This led BCC to launch a project in 2018 to add a ‘corrective plaque’ to the statue. This project failed after interventions by the Society of Merchant Venturers (SMV) and their supporters sanitised the wording on the plaque, leading Mayor Rees to halt the project. With no public forum to enable people to voice their concerns and with no apparent inclination or will in BCC to deal with the issue the situation became untenable. This state of affairs was aptly summarised by Prof. David Olusoga:
‘I wish it [Edward Colston’s statue] had been removed 20 to 30 years ago by the authorities, and it would have been if there had not been people in Bristol determined to defend the life of a mass murderer’.
Prof. Olusoga, we believe, is referring in part to undemocratic and unelected organisations of wealthy business people such as the SMV. Edward Colston and his colleagues in the Venturers were architects of the English slave trade, but the Merchants are not just a historical relic; they are an elite network who continues to run or be financially involved in a huge number of Bristol’s public services, schools, cultural and public spaces. The SMV have sustained the narrative of how Colston has been remembered in the city, celebrated his accumulation of wealth, yet ignored his crimes against humanity. The SMV has both financial interests in the brand of Colston as well an outmoded need to defend their icon’s dubious ‘tradition’.

Without the actions of BLM demonstrators on 7 June 2020, the statue of Edward Colston would have remained in place and the city would have continued to carry this embarrassing and damaging burden into the 21st Century. Instead, the fall of Colston has galvanised individual and institutional soul searching locally, nationally and internationally, re-assessing relationships to the history of slavery and colonialism. Bristol’s international reputation as a progressive city has been significantly enhanced by the events of June 7th but there is still plenty of work to be done. The prevalence of inequalities in Bristol outlined by the 2017 Runnymede Trust report (1) and the lack of a dedicated memorial and museum to remember the victims of transatlantic slavery remain neglected issues. Nationally and internationally, Bristol’s reputation and lack of will to examine its past over the decades, has been noted. The eyes of the world will now fall upon how it chooses to proceed.
I dunno if they feel they had to put that "we do not endorse criminal damage" bit in for legal reasons. Obviously you don't want to do anything that could undermine the defendants but at the same time, you'd hope people would feel able to make a "this particular bit of criminal damage is extremely good and we 100% endorse it" argument.
 


I dunno if they feel they had to put that "we do not endorse criminal damage" bit in for legal reasons. Obviously you don't want to do anything that could undermine the defendants but at the same time, you'd hope people would feel able to make a "this particular bit of criminal damage is extremely good and we 100% endorse it" argument.

The clue is in the word "criminal". You can't create a very good defence to a criminal charge by stating that although criminal it was not a crime. Better to deny the crime part (as well as the damage).
 
Its pretty much a given that they'll be a cunt
Fair point but I've seen some good results in Bristol.

A fella with extensive history was picked up near to ‘an event’ by riot filth who recognised him, nicked him for conspiracy (he genuinely hadn't anything to do with it), cuffed him, kicked him into a van, and took him down the station where he got a further kicking in the cells by 6-8 of them whilst his hands were cuffed behind and he was naked. With no other means to defend himself he bit into the side of one of them and didn't let go :D (I saw the photos - impressive teeth and jaw strength!) Thereupon he was charged with assault on a police officer and (IIRC) GBH, which from the porcine perspective was handy, because they had no evidence to stand up the conspiracy angle, which was quietly dropped.

At the trial it looked like he was fucked - the court was rammed with coppers (including the one he chewed a hole in) wanting to see him go down on what was something like his third AOAPO(!), and despite the defence brief's best efforts, the District Judge declined to throw the case out on the fruit-of-the-poisonous-tree-esque grounds that everything stemmed from a bogus, evidence-free nicking for conspiracy... :( But as police witness upon police witness gave evidence - including ages given over to the helicopter pilot and observer - it became more and more noticeable that the DJ wasn't prepared to taken their testimony at face value, chipping in comments and demanding clarifications, pointing out embellishments and contradictions, and making it very clear that they felt the beating in the cells was a cunt's trick (but, you know, expressed in more elegant legalese).

In the end? Convicted, but no custodial, no fine (“well, this is not a man of extensive means, so it would seem pointless”). Think he might even have got away with a Conditional Discharge, on a third AOAPO, with his teeth matching up to the wounds on a copper's body :D

So whilst not as good as an orchestral music swells/‘You can't handle the truth!’ courtroom acquittal moment, sometimes the other side getting served a shitty-tasting pyrrhic victory is a pleasant second best under the circumstances.
 
Last edited:
The clue is in the word "criminal". You can't create a very good defence to a criminal charge by stating that although criminal it was not a crime. Better to deny the crime part (as well as the damage).
Oh yeah, as far as legal defence goes that makes sense, I was more thinking in terms of it being a public press release by a campaign group not directly affiliated with the defendants.
 
There's a chance it may not go to court. What happens next is a pre-trial hearing (currently scheduled for 8th feb). This will be the legal bods arguing over how the thing can/will be done - which is exactly where how the defence will/can be carried out will be established. The trial itself - if it takes place - will not be for ages, maybe not even this year. Thus far we have had four accepted cautions and a racist twat from liverpool convicted of sending abusive messages.

There was was online support/fundraiser event the day of the last hearing which was briefly attacked by racists. There is going to be repeat of this if anyone is interested.
 
Posting this here but it does have relevance to protest in general:


 
I see the filth were surrounding the Churchill statue last night at the talking shop. Englandland the imperial theme park continues to deliver.
 
Back
Top Bottom