butchersapron
Bring back hanging
Robbie - get out of my house -fowler (not to be be confused for the everton version)
It isn't a nice day anymore-it's just started raining.
Another bizarre claim in that article is the idea that Yuri Gargarin's visit to Trafford Park (where the workface came from all over Manchester and was as much City as United) provides evidence of 'a link with communism.'
Another bizarre claim in that article is the idea that Yuri Gargarin's visit to Trafford Park (where the workface came from all over Manchester and was as much City as United) provides evidence of 'a link with communism.'
Trumpets - I'm not into football, I'm not a red and I'm not a blue, can't see the appeal TBH, all excited over players legs - Not my direction. But yeah, what you're saying is self evidently right (I would've thought). Anyway, you can state your own case better than I can, but I'll tell you what gets right on my nerves - "We're man united and we do what we want" ...Fuck do I hate that chant.
Its not really that bizarre. The phrase 'link with communism' is a little strange, granted.
But the trip was a trade union organised trip, they specifically went to Trafford Park because of its industry. The Foundry Union made him an honorary member and the Red Flag was flown over Albert Square.
They specifically chose Manchester and Trafford Park for a reason, that reason was because of the industrial working class nature and the trade union culture of the place.
An industrial and trade union culture, but not a communist one-that's all I was noting. The red flag being flown over Albert Square would have been the Stars and Stripes if the US had got there first-and they'd have gone to Trafford Park and been feted by the union bureaucrats just the same.
When the article linked to refers to City's roots in the Anglican church, it fails to mention the circumstances surrounding the club's formation in the inner-city Ardwick and West Gorton areas, which were that local clergyman's daughter Anna Connell was alarmed at the utter poverty and degradation she saw around her, and at the fact that the men tended to spend what little spare time they had drinking their wages. Then there was the problem of teenage gang warfare and the 'scuttling' phenomenon. Her response was to canvass the locality with a view to forming a sports club. There is no evidence that this was done on a sectarian basis as the article implies. Catholics in Manchester, as I know myself being from a Catholic background, have chosen City in their tens of thousands over the decades. I would say that a majority have probably favoured United for various reasons, but to nowhere near the extent that the article implies, and to refer to 'loyalist' City is a complete fantasy. Ditto with the claims that united are 'the club for immigrants generally': completely romanticised; successive wave of immigrants have tended to randomly favour one or the other club. Anybody who has known the pubs, schools, working class neighbourhoods and workplaces of Manchester well would acknowledge that attitudes towards the conflict in Ireland were pretty much interchangeable between both sets of fans, and in this respect the same as working class attitudes on the whole. There are no loyalist and republican professional football clubs outside Glasgow. In fact both sets of fans locally are, of course, interchangeable in most aspects.
So, a link between formal bureaucracies.Its not really that bizarre. The phrase 'link with communism' is a little strange, granted.
But the trip was a trade union organised trip, they specifically went to Trafford Park because of its industry. The Foundry Union made him an honorary member and the Red Flag was flown over Albert Square.
They specifically chose Manchester and Trafford Park for a reason, that reason was because of the industrial working class nature and the trade union culture of the place.
Man U the "formal bureaucracy" club.
And sheff utd being a half-decent club. That's what killed it for me.It isn't really about United as a club, or their fans, but the completely romanticised version of their history the article contains. As a useful contribution to working class football culture, it's akin to that Sean Bean film where he plays a miner, or some such, who gets to play for his local club despite looking about 43 and they appear to mix up several different eras.
It isn't really about United as a club, or their fans, but the completely romanticised version of their history the article contains. As a useful contribution to working class football culture, it's akin to that Sean Bean film where he plays a miner, or some such, who gets to play for his local club despite looking about 43 and they appear to mix up several different eras.
For being a football fan to work, you have to romanticise - he club, the players, the game itself, your relationship to it and so on ad nauseoum. Football is pretty shit if you strip the romance away and leave the cold hard reality in plain sight.
The files are due to be published on Wednesday of this week.let's not forget that much of the scousers' hatred for the murdoch press comes from the sun's coverage of hillsborough.
The heavily redacted files that have previously been vetted by south yorks and west mids.The files are due to be published on Wednesday of this week.
Afraid not.Oh not the full monty then...
Coming from several generations of Catholic United fans it was a bit of shock to me when my devout grandmother shortly before she died confessed to having been a closet City fan for years.