ElizabethofYork
Old Crone
Apparently he's in hospital suffering from massive mental health issues.
I can see a certain logic to it.
if the 16 or 17 year old has some fun that's a one off event. once it's over it's over.
but by taking pictures or video those exists forever. there's an ongoing potential for harm. if those images are passed on to others, for example. so the law is (trying) to protect the adolescent from that harm.
but I think it mostly comes to if images end up in the hand of a pedo, they don't care whether those were originally taken with consent. and the law doesn't want to muddy the waters by allowing them a defence to argue if they have been creating images themselves.
He's resigned
No he hasn't. He's in hospital.
or she knew he was about to be named, and is trying to protect him. She is asking for privacy.It was the only way to end the feeding frenzy. Sounds like his wife has had enough.
Not surprisinglyApparently he's in hospital suffering from massive mental health issues.
No he hasn't. He's in hospital.
As a they say so often.Police don't think anything criminal went down
You could see from the reporting today Beeb ain't really got his backJust been corrected on the 6 o'clock news - which said he'd resigned in the headlines.
Have to feel sympathy for his wife. Legal or not his actions have utterly betrayed her
if the images end up in the hands of a pedo surely they won't be all that interested because a 16/17 year old isn't the main interest of most pedos surely? I don't think we've done ourselves any favours stretching the definition of paedophilia from children to post-pubescent teenagers, let alone those over the age of consent!I can see a certain logic to it.
if the 16 or 17 year old has some fun that's a one off event. once it's over it's over.
but by taking pictures or video those exists forever. there's an ongoing potential for harm. if those images are passed on to others, for example. so the law is (trying) to protect the adolescent from that harm.
but I think it mostly comes to if images end up in the hand of a pedo, they don't care whether those were originally taken with consent. and the law doesn't want to muddy the waters by allowing them a defence to argue if they have been creating images themselves.
I'd be very very careful. Very careful.Wife of Huw Edwards names him as BBC presenter at centre of allegations
News comes shortly after Met says there is no evidence suspended presenter committed criminal offencewww.theguardian.com
Ok. Can we all talk about it now?
Have to feel sympathy for his wife. Legal or not his actions have utterly betrayed her
Go on thenWife of Huw Edwards names him as BBC presenter at centre of allegations
News comes shortly after Met says there is no evidence suspended presenter committed criminal offencewww.theguardian.com
Ok. Can we all talk about it now?
But on the other hand we're due a permaban on this threadI'd be very very careful. Very careful.
His wife just bubbled himThe presenter has named himself, with support from his wife.
The BBC has reported that Huw Edwards is facing “yet more allegations of inappropriate behaviour” this evening.
The new accusations are that he behaved inappropriately towards colleagues at the BBC.
Churchgoer too.Not just his wife - he's got 5 of his own children. Just a bit of a shit really.
They received a complaint in april.That must be the quickest review by the police I think I have ever seen