Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Avoiding meat and dairy is ‘single biggest way’ to reduce your impact on Earth

Synthetic meat is going to be a minefield. It'll likely be pumped full of all sorts of things to give it some nutritional value. I can't say I'm looking forward to it, if it ever happens.
 
Greedy capitalists are the problem. They're the cause of just about every problem, but its easier for some to point the finger at the consumer, especially so if it makes them feel better about their own life choices.
And people who refuse to even slightly cut back on their consumption of meat despite the consistent and clear message that has been sent out by scientists year after year.

*awaits fresh batch of home grown whataboutery.
 
Yeh I quite understand why we see so few horses now. But sk rather off the mark to say only the rich had horses. What about the horses who pulled the vehicles which took the invincibles from phoenix park, for example?

And the rag and bone man that operated in Thornton Heath well into the 90s. I don't reckon they were rich.

I don't think they were dirt poor either, but just wanted to throw that into this perpetual stew.
 
Synthetic meat is going to be a minefield. It'll likely be pumped full of all sorts of things to give it some nutritional value. I can't say I'm looking forward to it, if it ever happens.
And meat isn't already full of awful shit?

 
I've no idea if that will happen and neither have have you. None at all, yet you keep repeating this line like it's a fact,

But earlier you were emphatically claiming that only big mega corporates would have the means to produce lab grown meat. And you are totally wrong.

Not great sources of impartial information, though, tbf. That last one is a crypto-enthusiastic site, for instance. I just had a quick skim of the total fucking bullshit they spout about bitcoin from the first link I found.

The companies are all talking themselves up, of course, and that talking up is reported uncritically. From that second one:

Mosa Meat is aiming for a small scale commercial release within the next few years, following scale up of production facilities and regulatory approval.

But as that Nature article made very clear, scale up of production facilities remains an unsolved problem. Their burger first came out in 2013. I would wager a small sum that they said exactly the same thing about the time scale eight years ago. You have to to get funding. 'Well, maybe in 20 years' time but perhaps never' isn't going to attract many investors.
 
And meat isn't already full of awful shit?

Indeed, so imagine what the likes of Tyson foods will be getting up to when there's no animal welfare to take into consideration in the production of their food?
 
Whilst this is true, it's much more difficult for the processors to get a handle in actually producing beef and sheep, mostly because it requires land to do so, which people are not always willing to sell.

Poultry is vertically integrated because its easy to control. Synthetic meat will go the same way, and they'll be able to copyright the process.
I've tried to stay away from the cruelty issues because this is not a thread about that, but that's also not going to be improved by big producers, either, who have narrow margins and can move to other countries where the laws are more relaxed and more land is available. And if those companies have a synthetic-meat-manufacturing arm called something else, vegans and veggies will end up supporting them like everyone else. This is a big problem for everyone. This is the common enemy.
 
And meat isn't already full of awful shit?

All banned in the EU - synthetic hormones, that is. The one about hormones that naturally occur in animals is hardly anyone putting stuff in, is it? Damn cows, having an endocrine system.
 
Not great sources of impartial information, though, tbf. That last one is a crypto-enthusiastic site, for instance. I just had a quick skim of the total fucking bullshit they spout about bitcoin from the first link I found.

The companies are all talking themselves up, of course, and that talking up is reported uncritically. From that second one:



But as that Nature article made very clear, scale up of production facilities remains an unsolved problem. Their burger first came out in 2013. I would wager a small sum that they said exactly the same thing about the time scale eight years ago. You have to to get funding. 'Well, maybe in 20 years' time but perhaps never' isn't going to attract many investors.
Maybe, maybe not. But the fact that there are so many start ups getting involved (and those links were from a ten second search) puts paid to the bullshit that only enormo-mega corporates will be able to produce synthetic meats.
 
Maybe, maybe not. But the fact that there are so many start ups getting involved (and those links were from a ten second search) puts paid to the bullshit that only enormo-mega corporates will be able to produce synthetic meats.
No it doesn't.

Read the Nature article I linked to.

And may I suggest you spend 20 seconds searching next time and not link to crypto-wankers?
 
Indeed, so imagine what the likes of Tyson foods will be getting up to when there's no animal welfare to take into consideration in the production of their food?
And there you go again with your wild, groundless speculation. But anything that doesn't involve the horrendous exploitation of animals is already looking better to me.
 
I've tried to stay away from the cruelty issues because this is not a thread about that, but that's also not going to be improved by big producers, either, who have narrow margins and can move to other countries where the laws are more relaxed and more land is available. And if those companies have a synthetic-meat-manufacturing arm called something else, vegans and veggies will end up supporting them like everyone else. This is a big problem for everyone. This is the common enemy.
They already do - Cargill, for example.
 
And there you go again with your wild, groundless speculation. But anything that doesn't involve the horrendous exploitation of animals is already looking better to me.
Have you seen what goes on at Tyson foods chicken processing plants? It's not much of a stretch to imagine it won't be any better when they start producing synthetic meat. Thankfully, they're in the US of A, as are pretty much every meat company you speak of on this thread, so I won't be eating any of their produce. I hope the same applies to you in the UK.
 
Why did you post this? :confused:
Because despite that it might be an idea if I cut down on meat and dairy, I still love a cold glass of milk! and milk on my porridge etc ..

I actually don't eat so much meat these days, but milk and cheese would be hard to lose.
 
Because despite that it might be an idea if I cut down on meat and dairy, I still love a cold glass of milk! and milk on my porridge etc ..

I actually don't eat so much meat these days, but milk and cheese would be hard to lose.
Context! :cool:
 
Have you seen what goes on at Tyson foods chicken processing plants? It's not much of a stretch to imagine it won't be any better when they start producing synthetic meat. Thankfully, they're in the US of A, as are pretty much every meat company you speak of on this thread, so I won't be eating any of their produce. I hope the same applies to you in the UK.
EXCEPT THERE WILL BE ZERO ANIMAL CRUELTY. And they're not in the UK. So why are you going on about them?

:facepalm:
 
The whole point in a startup is to develop something that can be protected under IP law, then sold to the highest bidder.
Google was a start up once. So was Apple. So were endless other small companies who pursued an independent route. Some got big. Some didn't. Some were happy staying small, others were happy to sell up.

Your one size fits all extrapolating is ridiculous, and is just another example of your anti-vegan whataboutery. Or are you really going to assert that ALL start-up always end up being swallowed by mega-corps?
 
Google and Apple are now mega-corps. Not great examples. :D

Technically speaking, every company that's ever existed was a start up once.

Regarding how that works with new technology, there were hundreds of car manufacturers in Europe at the start of the 20th century. Most went to the wall or were bought out, leaving the handful of huge major manufacturers we have now, all of which had started small. It's quite a normal process.
 
Google was a start up once. So was Apple. So were endless other small companies who pursued an independent route. Some got big. Some didn't. Some were happy staying small, others were happy to sell up.

Your one size fits all extrapolating is ridiculous, and is just another example of your anti-vegan whataboutery. Or are you really going to assert that ALL start-up always end up being swallowed by mega-corps?

Oh, I see, so instead of being swallowed up by mega corps they could instead become mega corps. That's so much better. Thanks for putting our collective minds at ease.
 
Back
Top Bottom