Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Avoiding meat and dairy is ‘single biggest way’ to reduce your impact on Earth

Wait, have you seen the plans from the future that categorically state that all non meat production will be by a" gigantic processing corp"?
Bigger even than the industrial scale meat shifting KFC and McDonalds?

Amazing.
Synthetic non meat alternatives by default need a massive industrial process.
 
Yeh I quite understand why we see so few horses now. But sk rather off the mark to say only the rich had horses. What about the horses who pulled the vehicles which took the invincibles from phoenix park, for example?

You mentioned the year 1900. A generation after the famine and yes ..there were huge numbers of poorer people living outside the cities. They were not for the most part, horse owners. The poorer people in cities definitely didnt own a horse.
It was a mark of relative wealth to own a horse.
And yes...the majority of ordinary Irish people were very poor.
The middle classes could afford a horse and carriage...
Im a bit surprised that you think it really wasnt a big deal to own a horse and carriage.

As for the phoenix park Invincibles...they were into gun running and smuggling. They also had significant backing from the US Clan na Gael. No doubt someone foot the bill for horses and more.
 
You're just making up anti-vegan scaremongering nonsense. You have absolutely no fucking idea how the technology will or will not trickle down or be adapted by small producers. None
Rik said:
I suspect than in the next 10-20 years or so cellular meat and plant-based meats are going to get so good that they'll all but wipe animal farming off the face of earth. So you'll have to just wait and see for yourself.

Those, by default are massive industrial processes. Nobody cultures fucking cellular meat in their back kitchen.
 
Wait, have you seen the plans from the future that categorically state that all non meat production will be by a" gigantic processing corp"?
Bigger even than the industrial scale meat shifting KFC and McDonalds?

Amazing.
If everybody suddenly stops eating meat, do you think McDonald's, KFC et al will simply roll over and go out of business, or do you think they'll simply become the biggest non-meat burger suppliers?
 
You mentioned the year 1900. A generation after the famine and yes ..there were huge numbers of poorer people living outside the cities. They were not for the most part, horse owners. The poorer people in cities definitely didnt own a horse.
It was a mark of relative wealth to own a horse.
And yes...the majority of ordinary Irish people were very poor.
The middle classes could afford a horse and carriage...
Im a bit surprised that you think it really wasnt a big deal to own a horse and carriage.

As for the phoenix park Invincibles...they were into gun running and smuggling. They also had significant backing from the US Clan na Gael. No doubt someone foot the bill for horses and more.
1900 at least 2 generations after 1846-9. I'm not saying everyone had a horse but that they weren't all owned by the rich. You're arguing against things I haven't said. Oh and if you've any evidence Myles Kavanagh's cab or horse was bought with gold from America I'd love to see it.
 
This Nature article from December last year provides a decent overview of the current state of the science of cellular agriculture. The article is extremely upbeat in its tone more than its actual content. There are still plenty of technical hurdles to be overcome. I wouldn't be making any confident predictions about it taking over from meat in the near future. In 10 years' time? No way. The fundamental research is still being done. And then there is the scaling factor, which hasn't been solved. These problems might be overcome, of course, but there are no guarantees.

Tissue engineer Che Connon at Newcastle University, UK, estimates that feeding the world’s population with lab-grown meat would necessitate building systems for growing on the order of a septillion (1024) cells annually, something that is not possible with the types of batch bioprocessing techniques currently used in mammalian-cell-based manufacturing.

Will cell-based meat ever be a dinner staple?
 
1900 at least 2 generations after 1846-9. I'm not saying everyone had a horse but that they weren't all owned by the rich. You're arguing against things I haven't said. Oh and if you've any evidence Myles Kavanagh's cab or horse was bought with gold from America I'd love to see it.

They had help.
That's all I'm saying.
 
Rik said:


Those, by default are massive industrial processes. Nobody cultures fucking cellular meat in their back kitchen.

Again, you have absolutely no fucking idea how this industry will pan out, so you just trot out made up nonsense as facts , based on anything you can think of that will damn the non-meat industry.


Cell Farm Food Tech, which counts a team of four women and has a presence in Buenos Aires, London, and Hong Kong, takes biopsies from Hereford and Angus beef that form the main gene pool of Argentinian cattle and isolates the mesenchymal stem cells

 
If everybody suddenly stops eating meat, do you think McDonald's, KFC et al will simply roll over and go out of business, or do you think they'll simply become the biggest non-meat burger suppliers?
Ironically, Cargill- a massive meat processing corporation just disparaged by Rik, also produces synthetic meat. These companies aren't stupid, and there's the added bonus that processes like that can be protected legally.
 
If everybody suddenly stops eating meat, do you think McDonald's, KFC et al will simply roll over and go out of business, or do you think they'll simply become the biggest non-meat burger suppliers?
I don't give a fucking shit to be honest, but if they're going to exist, I'd rather them sell food that isn't the result of horrendous cruelty and needless environmental damage.
 
Again, you have absolutely no fucking idea how this industry will pan out, so you just trot out made up nonsense as facts , based on anything you can think of that will damn the non-meat industry.




And how fast do you think Cargill or some other industrial producers will either a) buy the company or b) produce their own and fuck them with economies of scale?
 
Ironically, Cargill- a massive meat processing corporation just disparaged by Rik, also produces synthetic meat. These companies aren't stupid, and there's the added bonus that processes like that can be protected legally.
Anybody who thinks the biggest meat suppliers won't become the biggest non-meat suppliers is deluded. It's an absolutely inevitable.
 
And how fast do you think Cargill or some other industrial producers will either a) buy the company or b) produce their own and fuck them with economies of scale?
I've no idea if that will happen and neither have have you. None at all, yet you keep repeating this line like it's a fact,

But earlier you were emphatically claiming that only big mega corporates would have the means to produce lab grown meat. And you are totally wrong.

 
I don't give a fucking shit to be honest, but if they're going to exist, I'd rather them sell food that isn't the result of horrendous cruelty and needless environmental damage.
But they'll be both, because meat isn't going anywhere anytime soon.
 
I've no idea if that will happen and neither have have you. None at all, yet you keep repeating this line like it's a fact,

But earlier you were emphatically claiming that only big mega corporates would have the means to produce lab grown meat. And you are totally wrong.

They are already doing it.

Its not a case of "if". Its happened and is on your supermarket shelves. Vertical integration with a retailer would make them unstoppable
 
You're just making up anti-vegan scaremongering nonsense. You have absolutely no fucking idea how the technology will or will not trickle down or be adapted by small producers. None
You missed the point there, though. As that enthusiastic Nature article makes clear, synthetic meat is still very much at the proof of concept stage, give or take a few chicken nuggets produced more or less as a novelty - I'm sure they're very expensive. It's not even yet clear how nutritious it will be.

Meanwhile, the big challenge for viability will be scaling up. That does represent a different kind of challenge from meat production, which people can do in their gardens.
 
You missed the point there, though. As that enthusiastic Nature article makes clear, synthetic meat is still very much at the proof of concept stage, give or take a few chicken nuggets produced more or less as a novelty - I'm sure they're very expensive. It's not even yet clear how nutritious it will be.

Meanwhile, the big challenge for viability will be scaling up. That does represent a different kind of challenge from meat production, which people can do in their gardens.
Which the people who have gardens... You are of course talking to a man (editor) who has no garden
 
You know that this is the same argument on both sides. Everyone's convinced that meat AND meat alternatives are absolutely fine because they can name small producers of either. But in the meantime the big corporations are laughing all the way to the bank, because it may not be you that's buying from the big producers (you probably are, though) but plenty of people are. So maybe it's time to recognise who the massive, corporate, polluting enemy actually is.
 
You know that this is the same argument on both sides. Everyone's convinced that meat AND meat alternatives are absolutely fine because they can name small producers of either. But in the meantime the big corporations are laughing all the way to the bank, because it may not be you that's buying from the big producers (you probably are, though) but plenty of people are. So maybe it's time to recognise who the massive, corporate, polluting enemy actually is.
Greedy capitalists are the problem. They're the cause of just about every problem, but its easier for some to point the finger at the consumer, especially so if it makes them feel better about their own life choices.
 
You know that this is the same argument on both sides. Everyone's convinced that meat AND meat alternatives are absolutely fine because they can name small producers of either. But in the meantime the big corporations are laughing all the way to the bank, because it may not be you that's buying from the big producers (you probably are, though) but plenty of people are. So maybe it's time to recognise who the massive, corporate, polluting enemy actually is.
Whilst this is true, it's much more difficult for the processors to get a handle in actually producing beef and sheep, mostly because it requires land to do so, which people are not always willing to sell.

Poultry is vertically integrated because its easy to control. Synthetic meat will go the same way, and they'll be able to copyright the process.
 
Back
Top Bottom