Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Avoiding meat and dairy is ‘single biggest way’ to reduce your impact on Earth

Quad bike miles? Sheep dog food? Whistles? Wool composting?

It’s probably a flawed calculation. The BBC article above says the figures are based on “Small World's Food carbon models” but when I google that the only result is that BBC article!
Small Worlds Consulting is the company that the author is a director of. He's basically quoting his own figures.
 
Quad bike miles? Sheep dog food? Whistles? Wool composting?

It’s probably a flawed calculation. The BBC article above says the figures are based on “Small World's Food carbon models” but when I google that the only result is that BBC article!
yeh. but then if you have a further look then you'll find small world consulting, and their publications page links to a range of resources from one of which i imagine the figures derive. or it might have come via the vegan society Carbon Food Calculator
 
yeh. but then if you have a further look then you'll find small world consulting, and their publications page links to a range of resources from one of which i imagine the figures derive. or it might have come via the vegan society Carbon Food Calculator

Well the first one I looked at had lamb at 15.53 compared to beef's 25.13, a difference to the above table surely not explained by the contribution of New Zealand lamb to the UK diet.

This differeing set of figures is lifted from a 2008 DEFRA study to which is attached some explanation:

"This study is reporting a much greater energy use, per tonne of meat delivered to the RDC, from the slaughter and processing of lambs than of cattle. The difference arises primarily from requirement for electricity for lamb slaughter and processing which, at 19.0 kWh/head is only c. 25% less than that required for cattle (25.5 kWh/hd) even though cattle may weigh up to 15 times more. However, the processing of lambs is more energy intensive. Total energy use for the primary processing of pork has estimated to be 8.5 GJ/t (including transport to the slaughter house and packaging) compared with our total of 14.5 GJ/t including transport and packaging). However, energy requirements for processing pork will be less as the hides are not removed.

Lamb meat is a commodity for which allocation of burdens is particularly important. Lamb meat is the main output, but mutton is an inevitable co-product that is nutritionally sound, but out of fashion in the UK. Wool is also produced and the NZ flock produces more wool per ewe than UK sheep (5 and 3 kg respectively annually). Economic valuation is the most rational way of allocating disparate burdens and was used here in pre farm gate analysis. Different data sources were examined and both MAF and the Meat & Wool New Zealand Economic Service provided data on the relative value of carcasses and the price of wool per kg in NZ. EBLEX record data on UK lamb meat prices and live cull ewe prices and the wool price is publically accessible. Some judgement was needed to resolve disparate data and it was assumed that wool is worth more in NZ as are mutton carcasses. This led to using allocations of all burdens of 64% and 74% for NZ and the UK respectively. It is considered that this subject requires an analysis of the partition of energy and protein partitioning to provide a sounder physiological basis for such allocations..

The largest source of GWP pre farm gate, was enteric fermentation in both the UK and NZ. The greater GWP arising from grazing in the UK was due to the greater amounts of fertilizer-N applied to UK pastures. The large energy input needed to process lamb, in comparison with other meats, lead to processing being the largest source of GWP in both countries. Transport, either to the UK or within the UK, gave rise to most of the rest of the GWP arising post farm gate."

So buying minimally processed whole lamb legs from unfertilized hill farms is probably better than eating mushrooms :thumbs:
 
I've definitely read studies that have said quite the opposite about UK hill farmed lamb - that it is particularly carbon intensive. I'll see if I can dig them out.
 
Spy has released the Kraken - you were warned, PM! :D
You post all day everyday and you can't/won't answer? :hmm:
Why won't you explain your weird cryptic post? Who have I been warned by and what about and why are you saying this? :confused:
And if you can't/won't explain why fucking post it in the first place?
 
You are on mutual ignore with ddraig
:D This is what happens when intellectually stunted plums go off half-cocked because they don't understand stuff :facepalm:
 
I don't blame you, I have him him on ignore but I'd wager he's denying basic science as well as justifying torturing, sexually abusing and slaughtering animals so he can stuff his greedy face with their body parts and bodily secretions. What a cunt.
Congratations. You're officially the frothiest vegan here.
 
Avoiding meat and dairy may be the single biggest way to reduce your impact but promoting a plant based die is the most unpopular of 18 options to combat climate change. UN global climate poll: ‘The people’s voice is clear – they want action’

Overall, the most popular actions to tackle the climate crisis were protecting and restoring forests, followed by renewable energy and climate-friendly farming. The promotion of plant-based diets was the least popular of the 18 policies in the survey, with only 30% support.
The relatively low support for the promotion of plant-based diets may be because there are few plant-based options in some countries or people may have felt that diet is more of a personal choice, said the UNDP. Support was highest in Germany (44%) and the UK (43%).
 
Avoiding meat and dairy may be the single biggest way to reduce your impact but promoting a plant based die is the most unpopular of 18 options to combat climate change. UN global climate poll: ‘The people’s voice is clear – they want action’
That's because people have to actually think about their consumption, take some responsibility, do stuff and change their ways.
If they can farm out their responsibilities for the environment to others they can carry on as they want
 
I think people are just aware of the utterly rank hypocrisy of lecturing the plebs about eating meat, while allowing massive corporations to do things like continue mining and burning coal, dodging their responsibilities through "carbon trading", and greenwashing.

Why the fuck should we be the ones to change our ways, when the people with the power and the money, you know, the ones actually responsible for the fucking mess in the first place, tell us to do one thing while enabling and indulging in the opposite?

This consumer-focused approach to environmentalism, rather than production-focused, is a neoliberal blind alley.
 
The single biggest way to reduce one’s impact on Earth is, of course, to refrain from having any offspring.
 
I think people are just aware of the utterly rank hypocrisy of lecturing the plebs about eating meat, while allowing massive corporations to do things like continue mining and burning coal, dodging their responsibilities through "carbon trading", and greenwashing.

Why the fuck should we be the ones to change our ways, when the people with the power and the money, you know, the ones actually responsible for the fucking mess in the first place, tell us to do one thing while enabling and indulging in the opposite?

This consumer-focused approach to environmentalism, rather than production-focused, is a neoliberal blind alley.
Do you chuck your rubbish in the street?
 
The single biggest way to reduce one’s impact on Earth is, of course, to refrain from having any offspring.


There is one thing that you can do that has an even bigger impact. 'They' hate the planet so much it was only decriminalised in 1961.
 
Back
Top Bottom