Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Assange seeks asylum in Ecuador embassy, London

Being forced to stay in London, which is currently enveloped in darkness, seems to have affected his health:

"Mr Assange, as everyone knows, is in a confined space," Ms Alban, the Ecuadorian Ambassador said.

"Not only does the embassy have few windows but the city is also dark at this time - we have very little daylight in London.

"He is exposed to any health consequences from this lack of sunlight and lack of fresh air."

wont someone give Jules a SAD lamp to help him through these dark times?

Next step will be Jules gets A Ecudorian Diplomatic passport to make good his escape I reckon
 
:D :D

https://twitter.com/EmmaK67

Emma Kennedy
@EmmaK67
Author of Tent, the Bucket and Me,Wilma Tenderfoot series, Killing Handbook, actor, Guardian Travel Columnist, Fun Editor at Tatler, Masterchef Champ

Emma Kennedy ‏@EmmaK67
Good to see Julian Assange now trying to rubbish a 14 year old girl shot in the head because she wanted to be educated. Way to go Julian


Emma Kennedy ‏@EmmaK67
Christ. What a pea sized hearted shitstick he's turned out to be

Emma Kennedy ‏@EmmaK67
So @wikileaks now basically boasting how they organised themselves to deny a 14 year old girl the title of Guardian Person of the Year

Emma Kennedy ‏@EmmaK67
Julian Assange - you are an utterly revolting individual. Utterly, utterly revolting
 
:D :D

https://twitter.com/EmmaK67

Emma Kennedy
@EmmaK67
Author of Tent, the Bucket and Me,Wilma Tenderfoot series, Killing Handbook, actor, Guardian Travel Columnist, Fun Editor at Tatler, Masterchef Champ

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/blog/2012/dec/10/bradley-manning-guardian-person-of-the-year-2012

Manning secured 70 percent of the vote, the vast majority of them coming after a series of @Wikileaks tweets. Project editor Mark Rice-Oxley said: "It was an interesting exercise that told us a lot about our readers, our heroes and the reasons that people vote...

Translate: "website 'readers' are retards" :D

Time to saw off the bottom half of the internet...
 
Wikileaks: We want you to remain sheep, but to follow a new sheep herder.

By the way for all the talk here of how Manning should get more attention than Assange, I didnt see any talk about the various details of his treatment in prison that emerged in court the other week. Not that I'm taking the moral highground since I didnt post about it either.
 
lol. Well I suppose I should not be surprised, these are the same sorts of criticisms that I developed myself, probably before his attempts to evade the judicial process reached very stinky proportions. He has cut off his own ideological legs, and only the dimmest of supporters will fail to realise this sooner or later. Even if he succeeds in his lifelong mission to avoid being held to account on oh so many levels, what will he be left with? A very modern quack whose ego is incompatible with the causes he claims to fight for.
 
Every time I read summat about Wikileaks (how it's organised rather than what it does or aims to do) it just reminds me more and more of Scientology...
 
Every time I read summat about Wikileaks (how it's organised rather than what it does or aims to do) it just reminds me more and more of Scientology...

Does anyone have any idea - was there ever any collective activity behind it?

I guess, if there were, everyone would be keeping their heads well down and allowing the impression that it's always been a crazed narcissistic-personality-disordered one-man band to flourish.

So we'd not really want to know, for the sakes of these hypothetical sane people, whether they exist or not :)
 
Does anyone have any idea - was there ever any collective activity behind it?

I guess, if there were, everyone would be keeping their heads well down and allowing the impression that it's always been a crazed narcissistic-personality-disordered one-man band to flourish.

So we'd not really want to know, for the sakes of these hypothetical sane people, whether they exist or not :)
Last week sometime, wikileaks were asking for donations for his legal fees :facepalm:
 
Does anyone have any idea - was there ever any collective activity behind it?

I guess, if there were, everyone would be keeping their heads well down and allowing the impression that it's always been a crazed narcissistic-personality-disordered one-man band to flourish.

So we'd not really want to know, for the sakes of these hypothetical sane people, whether they exist or not :)
Two others, both now disaffected, are named (well, one is only known by a nickname) in the article Random posted. It's a lot more than the title and "celebrity-backer" suggests. Gives a pretty thorough rundown of how and why she lost faith which covers most of the lies but is also very fair on what wikileaks achieved and those questions that remain about the legal process.
 
What is that saying about house guests: after the third day they start to smell - like a fish...

Assange must be stinking out the embassy by now :)
 
Nice to see the new statesman is the publication of choice for the rich now.
That's hardly a new thing, but in this case her main (secondary) source for demolishing the legal myths was David Allen Green and his NS blog. From what I recall they were the only media outlet that wasn't publishing hysterical denunciations or rape apologies or both (the Guardian certainly did both).
 
Back
Top Bottom