danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
It may have had a lot to do with his conviction and sentencing.What’s his skin colour got to do with his criminal history?
It may have had a lot to do with his conviction and sentencing.What’s his skin colour got to do with his criminal history?
Strikes me as weird to use it in an attempt to invoke sympathy for a misogynist.It may have had a lot to do with his conviction and sentencing.
Is it sympathy or a healthy and reasonable suspicion about the way a young black male might have been treated/managed by the law.Strikes me as weird to use it in an attempt to invoke sympathy for a misogynist.
Strikes me as weird to use it in an attempt to invoke sympathy for a misogynist.
If you'd bothered reading the article, you'd know that she wasn't.Perhaps his victim also was.
Or draw the conclusion that they in a position where they are not capable of taking rational decisions and also fear losing the custody of the childwell they're avoiding anyone helping them or getting any medical attention for their newborn child, so we can pass judgement on that.
I don't think we can know enough about the details & background in this case to pass judgement.
It often has a lot to do with perceptions
So it does. Not sure why I missed that.If you'd bothered reading the article, you'd know that she wasn't.
It’s difficult to see how his conviction has no relevance to the current situation but maybe it isn’t.All I know is that there are two adults and a baby who probably need support. I don't really see the relevance of clickbait about her family background or his childhood conviction.
I don’t see how that invalidates what I said. I was not defending him.Perhaps his victim also was.
I’m causing a row? ‘Poor rapist’ sentiments such as what Tim expressed are always going to get hackles to rise.I don’t see how that invalidates what I said. I was not defending him.
You seem intent on causing a row and not really interested in actually having a conversation so you crack on but I’m not interested in your ‘snappy’ retorts with zero substance.
I haven’t seen any ‘poor rapist’ sentiments? And I’m not Tim.I’m causing a row? ‘Poor rapist’ sentiments such as what Tim expressed are always going to get hackles to rise.
Reading between the lines I’m picking up hints of coercive control. Or that could just be a massive misreading on my part.I haven’t seen any ‘poor rapist’ sentiments? And I’m not Tim.
His conviction is probably connected to the concerns about this family but we don’t actually know and possibly never will.
Could be drugs
Could be chronic neglect
Could be DA
Could be worries about mental health
Link doesn't work.
OrI’m causing a row? ‘Poor rapist’ sentiments such as what Tim expressed are always going to get hackles to rise.
Shortly after meeting him she became estranged from family, friends, interests and studies she had been previously involved with. That’s some pretty readable hallmarks of coercive control and we already know he’s been sent down for an extreme act of misogyny. But yeah, I could just be seeing what I ‘want’ to see.5. If you "read between the lines" in such stories, you are likely to find what you want to find
Reading between the lines I’m picking up hints of coercive control. Or that could just be a massive misreading on my part.
Based on what, specifically?
The separation from her family could be a result of coercive control from him, or it could equally well be a result of a negative response from her family when they heard she was involved in a black man with an apparently unsavoury history.
A certain amount of speculation is inevitable, but you seem to be jumping to a whole lot of conclusions based on negative stereotyping.
Your conclusions might turn out to be correct, but if they do it won't be because they're actually based on anything very substantial.
I did say I might be wrong. Seems a very unusual and unhealthy setup though.Based on what, specifically?
The separation from her family could be a result of coercive control from him, or it could equally well be a result of a negative response from her family when they heard she was involved in a black man with an apparently unsavoury history.
A certain amount of speculation is inevitable, but you seem to be jumping to a whole lot of conclusions based on negative stereotyping.
Your conclusions might turn out to be correct, but if they do it won't be because they're actually based on anything very substantial.
The previous convition for rape the fact that it appears Social services were going to take the child away and the whole being on the run thing kind of learns towards the coercive control option rather than the family are racists option. It could also be that they are both pretty nasty and SS don't think the kid is safe with either of them.Based on what, specifically?
The separation from her family could be a result of coercive control from him, or it could equally well be a result of a negative response from her family when they heard she was involved in a black man with an apparently unsavoury history.
A certain amount of speculation is inevitable, but you seem to be jumping to a whole lot of conclusions based on negative stereotyping.
Your conclusions might turn out to be correct, but if they do it won't be because they're actually based on anything very substantial.