danny la rouge
More like *fanny* la rouge!
To be fair to Dom, that’s a list not a string of equations.
Great use of illustrations in that one.Yes, the Danny Burns book is good.
I couldn't remember if that was the one I read several years back or not. But I do remember it being the only book about the poll tax that the library had in their collection. I've just checked the catalogue and yes, that's the one.
I also remember reading this:
The Destruction of Toytown UK - BM Blob
A collection of accounts and analysis of the Poll Tax riot, 1990, published by BM Blob.libcom.org
For anyone wanting to connect with their inner armchair anarchist this winter, I can suggest no better tome than this by David Goodway:
How do you plan to win people over? What program or approach do you offer?Report of founding conference and aims and principles of the AnarCom Network (our constitution is also on our website) :
Have a Revolutionary 2023!
As 2022 comes to an end we celebrate the founding of our organisation. In just 4 months we have come together and formed an amazing network which while small has produced a lot of articles, 2 pamph…anarcomuk.uk
Free pretzels to all.How do you plan to win people over? What program or approach do you offer?
LogicFree pretzels to all.
I’m going to pretend I don’t understand your Steely Dan reference, you hippy.Logic
I shouldn't derail like this, but picking up a (decent) vinyl of that album in a chassa for £10 was one of my musical highs of the year; love the album.I’m going to pretend I don’t understand your Steely Dan reference, you hippy.
Not to prolong the derail, but I think you’d like Horace Silver and Kenny Burrell, then, because those were the biggest influences on Steely Dan.I shouldn't derail like this, but picking up a (decent) vinyl of that album in a chassa for £10 was one of my musical highs of the year; love the album.
Derail over.
Bless. Just what the world needs, another pointless little splitette of a group writing self importantly and badly. You’ll have another one for next year, no doubt.Report of founding conference and aims and principles of the AnarCom Network (our constitution is also on our website) :
Have a Revolutionary 2023!
As 2022 comes to an end we celebrate the founding of our organisation. In just 4 months we have come together and formed an amazing network which while small has produced a lot of articles, 2 pamph…anarcomuk.uk
Hilarious. But you’re assuming that organisation necessitates hierarchy. That’s a political assertion not a law of nature.
Not to prolong the derail, but I think you’d like Horace Silver and Kenny Burrell, then, because those were the biggest influences on Steely Dan.
Check out:
My answer to this is as follows - This would be done by communities via popular assemblies and workers' councils ie. the commune.So how do you organise services for sixty million people with no hierarchy?
Who takes the decisions, and how?
Who enforces decisions?
Name a country that has been successfully run on anarchist principles.
So how do you organise services for sixty million people with no hierarchy?
Who takes the decisions, and how?
Who enforces decisions?
Name a country that has been successfully run on anarchist principles.
By having a lazy aristocracy.
Rich people, in their own interests.
An organisation in the employ of the state which is controlled by wealthy people.
A contradiction of Capitalism is that it relies on socialist interactions at the bottom to function.
Federation. Not that the concept “nations” would be the same.Very good.
Now answer the questions actually put.
I'm genuinely interested. I suppose anarchism could work in a small commune, I'm interested in how it would work in a nation of sixty million people.
My answer to this is as follows - This would be done by communities via popular assemblies and workers' councils ie. the commune.
Some notable examples of worker's self organisation would be significant parts of Spain during the Spanish civil war (particularly in rural areas but also urban collectives) and also the Makhnovist areas of Ukraine from 1918-21 (there are other examples of this sort of thing aswell, throughout histroy).
I would recommend reading about it and looking into it for yourself, and it can be very detailed (there are certain books dedicated to this topic) , but here's one summary of such things (from 2003) :
A Brief History of Popular Assemblies and Worker Councils
Morpheus A Brief History of Popular Assemblies and Worker Councils 15th August 2003theanarchistlibrary.org
You need to explain why that is the case, although as danny la rouge pointed out we're talking about federations here, not really nations.There is absolutely no way that the needs of a large nation could be met on the basis you propose above.
Jfc you been on here 20 years and you're only just asking? How staggeringly incurious of you.So how do you organise services for sixty million people with no hierarchy?
It would work in a small community until a bigger community came killed them all and stole their land.Very good.
Now answer the questions actually put.
I'm genuinely interested. I suppose anarchism could work in a small commune, I'm interested in how it would work in a nation of sixty million people.
Famously this is why capitalism never took off.It would work in a small community until a bigger community came killed them all and stole their land.
As has happened many times in the past.
I have many interests, each, in the fullness of time, gets their turn.Jfc you been on here 20 years and you're only just asking? How staggeringly incurious of you.
So, how do you persuade a city like London to become a series of communes? How do deal with issues like transport across the city?You need to explain why that is the case, although as danny la rouge pointed out we're talking about federations here, not really nations.
Not sure you've the hair for fringe politicsI have many interests, each, in the fullness of time, gets their turn.
Also based on importance, fringe politics comes way down the list.