Shippou-Sensei
4:1:2.5
Orkney seems to be at least 30% archeology.
the conclusion:The Theory That Men Evolved to Hunt and Women Evolved to Gather Is Wrong
The influential idea that in the past men were hunters and women were not isn’t supported by the available evidencewww.scientificamerican.com
And ancient women and men appear to have engaged in the same foraging activities rather than upholding a sex-based division of labor. It was the arrival some 10,000 years ago of agriculture, with its intensive investment in land, population growth and resultant clumped resources, that led to rigid gendered roles and economic inequality.
That's fascinating. Think I've mentioned here before that skeletal and other analyses of burial at catalhoyuk showed there were no differences between the work roles men and women performed, same toolsets too and same diets. Clearly patriarchy was not inevitable.interesting article:
the conclusion:
I wonder what the climate in the region was like at the time? How old is the Amazon rain forest?Huge ancient lost city found in the Amazon
The city was built 2,500 years ago but may have been abandoned after a volcanic eruption.www.bbc.co.uk
Finding new evidence for a much more thriving and varied Amazon pretty much daily at this point
55 million years apparently.I wonder what the climate in the region was like at the time? How old is the Amazon rain forest?
Wiki said:The rainforest likely formed during the Eocene era (from 56 million years to 33.9 million years ago). It appeared following a global reduction of tropical temperatures when the Atlantic Ocean had widened sufficiently to provide a warm, moist climate to the Amazon basin. The rainforest has been in existence for at least 55 million years, and most of the region remained free of savanna-type biomes at least until the current ice age when the climate was drier and savanna more widespread.
...
There is evidence that there have been significant changes in the Amazon rainforest vegetation over the last 21,000 years through the last glacial maximum (LGM) and subsequent deglaciation.
Ah, so after there perhaps was once more savanna than there is now.55 million years apparently.
Second century Buddha statue dug up in an Egyptian Red Sea port: A marble statue of Buddha was uncovered in Berenike at the Red Sea
Its findings, which are the earliest evidence of a complex adhesive in Europe, suggest these predecessors to modern humans had a higher level of cognition and cultural development than previously thought.
"These astonishingly well-preserved tools showcase a technical solution broadly similar to examples of tools made by early modern humans in Africa, but the exact recipe reflects a Neanderthal 'spin,' which is the production of grips for handheld tools," says Radu Iovita, an associate professor at New York University's Center for the Study of Human Origins.
The research team [...] re-examined previous finds from Le Moustier, an archaeological site in France that was discovered in the early 20th century.
The stone tools from Le Moustier—used by Neanderthals during the Middle Paleolithic period of the Mousterian between 120,000 and 40,000 years ago—are kept in the collection of Berlin's Museum of Prehistory and Early History and had not previously been examined in detail. The tools were rediscovered during an internal review of the collection and their scientific value was recognized.
"The items had been individually wrapped and untouched since the 1960s," says Dutkiewicz. "As a result, the adhering remains of organic substances were very well preserved."
"DNA evidence suggests violent battles and the introduction of new pathogens caused another swift genetic shakeup."Saw this a couple of weeks ago. I'd thought people used to believe that hunter gatherers had been wiped out by hunter gatherers then that they hadn't ...
Hunter-gatherers were violently wiped off the map by farmers, DNA reveals
Contrary to what has long been believed, there was no peaceful transition of power from hunter-gather societies to farming communities in Europe, with new advanced DNA analysis revealing that the newcomers slaughtered the existing population, completely wiping them out within a few generations.newatlas.com
My bold. The claim is nowhere near as strong as the headline makes out., in what they suspect was a very bloody and very thorough takeover.
“This transition has previously been presented as peaceful," said Anne Birgitte Nielsen, geology researcher and head of the Radiocarbon Dating Laboratory at Lund University. "However, our study indicates the opposite. In addition to violent death, it is likely that new pathogens from livestock finished off many gatherers."
Presumably DNA that suddenly stops appearing in the fossil record after a narrow archeological window."DNA evidence suggests violent battles and the introduction of new pathogens caused another swift genetic shakeup."
I'm not sure how DNA evidence alone could tell you there had been violent battles.
I'm also interested how they ruled out the hunter-gatherers simply fucking off somewhere else.
That would establish that they no longer lived there, not what killed them ('violent battles' or 'new pathogens'), or whether they had in fact migrated elsewhere.Presumably DNA that suddenly stops appearing in the fossil record after a narrow archeological window.
It isn't DNA evidence alone, thats the thing. It is DNA evidence alongside everything else we know. A more important sentence is:"DNA evidence suggests violent battles and the introduction of new pathogens caused another swift genetic shakeup."
I'm not sure how DNA evidence alone could tell you there had been violent battles.
I'm also interested how they ruled out the hunter-gatherers simply fucking off somewhere else.
which we know about because we have found evidence, There is, seemingly, no evidence of them having done so here. Of course it's still possible they did so, but thats an even bigger assumption if there isn't actual evidence for it.You still get massive outmigrations long into the historical era when hunter populations come under pressure from stronger incomers.