Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Anti-paedophile demo - Weymouth

What's small minded about being concerned about their kids and community - not all people start off perfectly formed with the exact right approach. Maybe you could reach out to these concerned morons?

I understand the concern and yes if you h had kids id voice an opinion on it too but - i think this is a knee jerk reaction from what is a very sheltered town to something the people there dont understand. I dunno the ins and outs of the story, to be honest im a bit yankered, but lets say it does not surprise me that this is coming from weymouth.
 
What's small minded about being concerned about their kids and community - not all people start off perfectly formed with the exact right approach.

No they most certainly don't. The BNP are concerned about their kids and the community too. I've no sympathy for hysterical vigilantes, they're too easily manipulated.
 
...and if it's mothers on council estates on which there's a dumping policy and victims of abuse? Are these the wrong sort of people.
 
None of which was in your bold or what it implied (or has anything at all to do with what i posted in fact) - and let's be 100% clear, you tried to imply that it means some kind of mob justice. None of the above was broached in that post, please don't try and pretend that it was (it got worse on looking at the full non cut off quote)

I can see how you interpreted it as that. It really wasn't my intention to portray it as such. Rather it was my intention to portray the absurdity of demonstrating that SOMETHING must be done but "we don't know what".

I have no reason to think that particular demonstration was advocating mob vengeance. I don't think it was incidentally. I think it had more to do with the "not in our back yard" mentality that was so common to the middle class in past decades. The "we don''t want the young offenders centre or the city dump cus it lowers house prices" so beloved of the middle class has become a "we don't want demonised monsters" crusade that resonates with a section of sun reading " pedo" hysterical working class communities.

It is a motivation made from fear and for this reason I find it scary because it is through fear that our most precious liberties are handed over to the state, "Do something!, is the rallying cry of fear as we hand over our freedoms to a more and more authoritarian state. After all "if you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear."

I live in a council estate and I know for a fact that there are terrible parents here.I see it all the time. Parents that do nothing but scream at their kids from morning till night. Parents that show no love to their kids at all. But this lumpen dysfunctional kind of abuse isn't the subject of these peoples concerns. Rather it is the mysterious and largely mythical monster handing out sweeties in the shadows. It's a hysterical red herring stoked by the tabloid press.. Out if fear we end up begging for more disclosures, more CRB type regulations and before we know it we end up in 1984. fuck that.
 
...and if it's mothers on council estates on which there's a dumping policy and victims of abuse? Are these the wrong sort of people.

Whoever is behind that web site is very much the wrong sort of person. Anyone who went on that demo is very much the wrong sort of person. Hang 'em high law'n'order fanatics. Ripe pickings for fascists of all sorts.
 
Domain Name: THERATBOOK.COM
Registrar: GODADDY.COM, INC.
Whois Server: whois.godaddy.com
Referral URL: http://registrar.godaddy.com
Name Server: NS45.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Name Server: NS46.DOMAINCONTROL.COM
Status: clientDeleteProhibited
Status: clientRenewProhibited
Status: clientTransferProhibited
Status: clientUpdateProhibited
Updated Date: 14-sep-2009
Creation Date: 27-jun-2008
Expiration Date: 27-jun-2012
 
I'm making a reference to the paulsgrove (and later somerset) protests.

Sorry, i should do more research before posting! I was living on an estate in north london when one of the neighbours, who was care in the community, stabbed a pregnant woman for no reason. We also had a schizophrenia heroin addict in the flat next door who used to run out in the street and punch passing cars. I understand not wanting to be near people with dangerous personality disorders and disabilities but they-re part of our world and they have to in somewhere
 
* Animal cruelty
* Child abuse
* Disabilities
* Domestic abuse
* Drug offences
* Elderly abuse
* Kidnapping
* Murderer
* Paedophile
* Pervert
* Rapist
* Sexual assault
* Social services
* Terrorist
* Theft
* Violent crime

When did working for Social Services become criminalised?
 
I understand the concern and yes if you h had kids id voice an opinion on it too but - i think this is a knee jerk reaction from what is a very sheltered town to something the people there dont understand. I dunno the ins and outs of the story, to be honest im a bit yankered, but lets say it does not surprise me that this is coming from weymouth.

i dont really see how its different from the Reclaim the Night marches

ratbook on the other hand is concerning
 
I approve of paedos being known to their community as the re-offending rate is extremely high. My home town had a very high number of the sick fuckers and the fact that they were known to the locals went some way to protecting us as children. The fact that many of them have since been convicted of child porn offences goes to showtheir level of depravity.


If you have any doubt look up http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tom_O'Carroll , . The local priest was a paedo and had to serve time, for some reason the town seemed to attract the sick fuckers. I can imagine being a seaside town Weymouth attracts its own fair share.
 
The fact that many of them have since been convicted of child porn offences doesn't show anything beyond that; there's evidence that a more permissive attitude to porn reduces the amount of rape, for example.
 
But I thought this sort of thing was illegal? Whats the law regarding it?

Whats the difference between sex offenders and "perverts" btw?

Btw I wouldn't surprise me if some of the people behind this had convictions for violent crime...
Oh, this one's easy! Perverts do things that the new normative sexuality hasn't yet criminalised.
 
The fact that many of them have since been convicted of child porn offences doesn't show anything beyond that; there's evidence that a more permissive attitude to porn reduces the amount of rape, for example.

Since most child porn is a direct product of abuse I would be fascinated to hear how your theory applies.
 
Child porn is defined as abuse, so that's a truism, right?

And a truism is compatible with any theory at all, so you haven't actually managed to say anything, yet :)
 
Yes you posted that a tautology is a tautology. Well done. Now, if you'd like to address your bulging brain yourself to the first part of Kenny's post - who produces child porn, not it's definition.
 
Back
Top Bottom