Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

And next, Syria?

The Kurdish-led forces played a major role in routing ISIS. Do you expect them to conquer Damascus?
Apparently it's not completely off the cards. If the Kurds switch sides and join in with the Idlib rebels (HTS+FSA) then I think they very well could take Damascus, yes, and within days. This looks like collapse in the Syrian Armed Forces, the rebels have taken Hama in the last few hours
 
Some points to ponder.

I imagine that if I were a member of a minority ethnic or religious group in Syria, such as the Kurds, the Druze, the Alawites, or the Christians, I would prefer the Assad regime to an Islamist regime.

I imagine that a large proportion of the female population of that country, whatever their religion or ethnicity, would also prefer a secularist dictatorship to a religious dictatorship.

I do not applaud the bombing of Syria by the air force of the Russian Federation, but one thing to bear in mind is that it is legal in international law, whereas the bombing of that country by the USAF, RAF, and others was illegal. It is legal for a state to invite another state to engage in military action on its territory. The bombing of the Iraq by the USAF et al against ISIS was legal, because it was agreed by the government of Iraq.

It seems to me that the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces, which includes militias base on a number of ethnic minority groups, is a supportable force.​
 
Things are moving so fast it's hard to keep up - there are reports of a coup attempt by a member of Assad's own family (so internecine) in Damascus too
 
Some analysis from Robin Yassin-Kassab. I'm not sure I'm convinced by his optimism.
The fact that other parts of Syria are rising, and under different commands, is important because it means HTS influence will be diluted. If several parts of the country are liberated, HTS will have to build a united front with people with other perspectives and political backgrounds.
 
The sort of analysis that says any regime change by even the most reactionary elements is ok if somehow this weakens an imperialist backer of that state.
It's not a foregone conclusion that the most reactionary elements would take power in Damascus if the Assad regime fell, a secular uprising could prevent that, and I feel a secular uprising would be easier to win against a widely unpopular HTS than it would, evidently, be against Assad.

But hey ho let's just accept the status quo and equate anti-Assad forces with ISIS at every opportunity.
 
It's not a foregone conclusion that the most reactionary elements would take power in Damascus if the Assad regime fell, a secular uprising could prevent that, and I feel a secular uprising would be easier to win against a widely unpopular HTS than it would, evidently, be against Assad.

But hey ho let's just accept the status quo and equate anti-Assad forces with ISIS at every opportunty.
My remarks were quite specific in what they were addressing and it certainly wasn't equating anti-Assad forces with ISIS at every opportunity.

I agree it isn't a foregone conclusion. I'm not an Assad supporter and I'm all for a secular uprising, and however unlikely, one that isn't either dependent on or in the Turkish, US or Russian camp. But hey ho.
 
  • Like
Reactions: PTK
I find it's particularly difficult to separate fact from propaganda in this war, perhaps because it is such a genuinely multi-faceted conflict that it is easy to create a variety of convincing narratives around it.

I just have two thoughts about what is happening:

1- If Assad's regime is this dependent on foreign support to survive then it probably doesn't have any popular legitimacy to speak of.

2- Very worrying how this seems like an area in which the conflicts in Ukraine and the Middle East could start to converge into a wider war.
 
Apparently it's not completely off the cards. If the Kurds switch sides and join in with the Idlib rebels (HTS+FSA) then I think they very well could take Damascus, yes, and within days. This looks like collapse in the Syrian Armed Forces, the rebels have taken Hama in the last few hours
The left allying with right-wing forces never ends well.

Left-wing parties in Iran allied with Islamists in the revolution of 1979, and we could ask their members how that turned out, those that are not lying in graves.

The Islamist forces in Syria would no more tolerate the Kurdish forces, which are led by a pro-Marxist party, than any other reactionary movement would tolerate the left.​
 
SDF loses control of Tal Rifaat but hasn't withdrawn from Sheikh Maqsood neighbourhood within Aleppo.


eta:
Tal Rifaat is on the road from Aleppo to Gaziantep in Turkey so it may be seen as strategically important. It doesn't look like there's an immediate threat to Kurdish controlled areas further east.

Displaced people of Shahba in northern Aleppo are heading to the city after the Turkish backed SNA took over the area.
Tens of thousands of Kurdish civilians mostly displaced from previous conflicts from Shahba and Aftin are on the move heading to the Kurdish controlled neighborhoods in Aleppo as Turkish backed militia groups take over their regions in north of the city
 
Last edited:
I'm not saying that they should or shouldnt be called 'rebels', but apparently the Russian media refer to them as 'terrorists'. This is not a point about what they should be called, but just to say I'm old enough to remember the word 'terrorists' to describe resistence to the West in the Middle East and the MSM unanimously going with 'rebel' is immediately highlighted and noticable to me, and I guess anyone old enough.
 
HTS trying to reassure Kurds.

Interesting new statement from HTS Political Affairs Dept denouncing ISIS oppression of the Kurds and claiming that HTS will not harm Kurdish communities. HTS also emphasizes that Kurds are a full and equal part of Syria. Significant change from 10 years ago, but HTS has shifted somewhat in Afrin and elsewhere the past few years. We'll see if Kurds and the SDF believe it in the coming days.
 
Back
Top Bottom