Fucking feeble response. But what more can one expect from a humourless twat like you?
That's a bit much, coming from an archetypal po-faced leftie dullard.
Fucking feeble response. But what more can one expect from a humourless twat like you?
You see, you keep crapping on about "pessimism" and that's your problem: you reject anyone who doesn't share your er, pessimism. You're a little like those Randists who keep bitching about altruism, you hate the very thought that someone could be optimistic. But then I also suspect that your "pessimisim" is really cynicism, you're just don't want to admit it. Perhaps you don't know the difference.
But I pity anyone unfortunate enough to have to spend an evening with you. You'd have them reaching for the gin and razor blades in a heartbeat.
It is true, as you say, that whenever somebody in the public eye says something that falls outside the bland mainstream consensus, there is a call for them to be sacked or resign, even when they're merely eccentric, self-publicising twits like this MP.
The remnants of the radical left, in joining in with these sterile cries of outrage, reinforce this bland consensus, thus deepening their apparently unwitting commitment to their contemporary role as metaphorical bag carriers for soft-left and liberal commentators.
I wont pretend to have trawled this thread completely, but are there really 'radical left' types, joining in "with these sterile cries of outrage" ( nicely put btw !) on here or elsewhere ? I think it was even Laurie penny ( or Zoe Williams or some other highly paid wadical journo) who wrote a decent ' fuck off with all the lame 'outrage'bullshit 'article a year + ago , I just dont see anyone with half a brain on the left joining in with this rubbish ( you'll no doubt bat that off with 'no one with half a brain remaining on the left' or something , but whatevs.)
If you haven't read the thread then maybe you should.
(I can't believe that the irrelevant Laura even gets a mention here.)
had a quick look, it's difficult to find any of that 'rage' , sterile or otherwise, from any 'remnants of the radical left' ?
That's a bit much, coming from an archetypal po-faced leftie dullard.
You're not only a liar, you're a bully. It shows how much you know about Randists if you refer to them as "optimists". You're not as bright as you think you are.Why does it only matter that I 'reject' a viewpoint? Everybody 'rejects' views with which they find it impossible to agree.
Pessimism, cynicism, again, what does it matter? But I really don't mind if somebody chooses to take an optimistic viewpoint. Takes all sorts etc. (Nobody, by the way, has ever killed themselves because I've pricked their little bubble of optimism. As far as I know.)
Randists, by the way, are the ultimate optimists. You have more in common with them than I do.
You're not only a liar, you're a bully. It shows how much you know about Randists if you refer to them as "optimists". You're not as bright as you think you are.
Better than being a bully, eh?
But it's a bit rich you referring to me as "po-faced" when you're the most miserable fucker on here.
I don't claim to be particularly bright. Luckily, you don't have to be bright to address fifth-rate intellectuals like you.
Randists are optimistic about the possibilities of human endeavour, as are the neo-liberals they have influenced. Socialists don't have the monopoly on optimism, just as the right don't have exclusive rights to pessimism.
And here we have another one who thinks you can be bullied by messageboard. In what way can anything I've said here be construed as bullying, soft lad?
Here's a clue: being pessimistic about the prospects for the kind of politics you favour does not necessarily mean that you are personally miserable. I wouldn't say I was any more or less miserable than the next person.
You, on the other hand, typify the po-faced humourless lefty that drives everybody except your kind away from the left.
More clichés. Everyone but you is a "fifth rate intellectual". Does this make you anti-intellectual?
And yes, bullies do operate on messageboards of course, I wouldn't expect you to grasp this. Your shit never stinks.
No, you're an anti-intellectual. Get it right.No, I'm a fifth-rate intellectual like you although I suspect you received a better education.
So where's the bullying?
What utter shite. Do you actually think before you type?
No, you're an anti-intellectual. Get it right.
Go away, you idiot. I never asked you to start snapping at my heels in the first place.
That's because you think you are an intellectual.
Now you're trying to abdicate responsibility for the consequences of your actions. Bravo, prick.
Said without a trace of irony too.
What-after you answered a post with nothing other than a mere (ineffectual) insult?
And this is the gobshite who accused me of derailing the thread.
You clearly think you are some kind of intellectual notable.
Is calling some an "intellectual" some kind of insult where you come from, LLETSA?
Whereas you think your shit doesn't stink.
You imagined it. You came to this thread with the intention of disrupting it now you're trying to pass the blame.
Look, the only reason you are getting uptight about the word intellectual is because that's what you consider yourself to be when you're clealy nothing but a dogmatic leftie stereotype.
No, as I said, please fuck off.
With those kinds of clichés, you should be writing for the Daily Heil.