spring-peeper
Well-Known Member
new member be gone.
post deleted
post deleted
Last edited:
If you can get ~600 people in a c17 then three flights would be all that were needed to ship all MPs and lords to kabul5) The MPs/Journalists/BBC who are basically agitating for restarting an unwinnable war should actually be dumped somewhere (the Panshir Valley?) along with lots of copies of the Guardian & left to get on with it.
and dont forget journalists: though some like that whining warmonger Lyce Doucet or whatever she's called are still there: just pick them up and drop em on the way home. Though I will miss her jokes, I'll try to get over it...If you can get ~600 people in a c17 then three flights would be all that were needed to ship all MPs and lords to kabul
Maybe 4 flights then.and dont forget journalists: though some like that whining warmonger Lyce Doucet or whatever she's called are still there: just pick them up and drop em on the way home. Though I will miss her jokes, I'll try to get over it...
and don't forget Tony Blair/Alastair Campbell, both with blood on their hands. In their case, as a cost-cutting measure, I'd dispense with parachutes...Maybe 4 flights then.
Interesting piece in US site Truthout reminding us the invasion was illegal, Taliban offered to give up OBL etc Here
The BBC scum have never mentioned this in their recent propaganda of course. Russia Today is far better not least because you know it’s propaganda…
Wonder how things would have unfolded if Bush had accepted the Taliban's offer in the early days of the great imperialist adventure
Bush rejects Taliban offer to hand Bin Laden over
Oooh, edgy....
It looks like the US now claims authority for drone/air strikes to continue against ISIS-K?
1. It's not about whether occupation could've "worked" or not, as with all foreign invasions it would've been an atrocity under all circumstancesAm I alone in thinking
1) We should never have been there: from the 19th Century Afghan Wars on, no occupation of Afghanistan was ever going to work: as shown by the Washington Post investigation
2) Indeed, the Taliban offered to give up Bin Laden to the US (see Brisard/Dasquier) & so the pretext for invasion was bogus.
3) Whatever I think of the Taliban (not much) those who collaborated with the occupying powers (US/UK) are not people I greatly empathise with. Harsh maybe, but I'm not a liberal.
4) Biden is not senile & his explanation for leaving now was one of the few credible things I have ever heard from a US President
5) The MPs/Journalists/BBC who are basically agitating for restarting an unwinnable war should actually be dumped somewhere (the Panshir Valley?) along with lots of copies of the Guardian & left to get on with it.
Think that's more to aid the 40 SAS having an Afgan camping holiday
I am astonished a car should be taken aboard one of the planes on obvious security issues alone.
They could walk there though.Maybe 4 flights then.
See thread
yeh but they might take a wrong turning in germany or turkey or iran, and we wouldn't want thatThey could walk there though.
See thread
Pretty week argument. They left shitloads of military equipment, hundreds of helicopters etc. There's nothing in that thread that suggests the vehicle was more important than saving lives.
1. Agreed: I was just introducing historical perspective to provide context1. It's not about whether occupation could've "worked" or not, as with all foreign invasions it would've been an atrocity under all circumstances
2. We'll never know the true plans and motivations of the invaders, though we can see the results, from Bamako to Jalalabad
3. Thats harsh, there are endless justifiable reasons why normal people may have collaborated, including basic survival instinct, hunger, anti-Taliban feeling etc etc
4. What was that explanation that you liked from Biden? I haven't listened closely to him. I did read a transcript of him pathetically try and say 'I was tied into it because Trump did a deal'
5. Long overdue
what was the bit you thought was good Larry, genuinely curious - as i say i havent been following the Biden element of this much - even the gist of what you mentioned4. Interested to hear you say you read a transcript of Biden. I went to the BBC site and could only find a transcript supposedly’fact checked’/—which was just propaganda. So I sought his live broadcast of 18:06 minutes on CBS and found it useful
He basically said (précis from memory using my words)what was the bit you thought was good Larry, genuinely curious - as i say i havent been following the Biden element of this much - even the gist of what you mentioned
* the 'transcript' i read was a live blog reporting a news conference with a few key lines
Which occupation? The occupying powers have gone. What is going on now is the aftermath of a civil war is it not?Well, a journalist who misses the new aunts or Bing have to find the recorded version of a president speech. But can’t muster sympathy for those living under the occupation. Worthless twat.
What a wrong headed comment. I can't imagine there are very many, if any, penguins left in Kabul zooIf you can get ~600 people in a c17 then three flights would be all that were needed to ship all MPs and lords to kabul