I was vaguely considering going to see Uniform at the White Hotel then, but sure I could work something out.
ive noticed a trend of people putting on events with food available <i like that a lot, good social bond building stuffOh, while I remember, here's a Manc thing happening soon:
View attachment 441195
Can't fund much other public info about it so far but sure there should be more soon.
Shielding lobsters with umbrellas at the seaside?Sorry, we're on our hols that week.
Bundobust are at the beer festival I'm at in Leeds tonight. Selling their beer and food and they have a DJ I'm definitely having some okra friesThe combos at Bundobust are nice - had the vegan combo for two last time I was there and it was probably too much food for two people. The okra fries were particularly good.
You're a proper social butterly. How do you cope with dealing with all those people?Well on Monday 30th I was considering going to see Crack Cloud at Gorilla, can try to be around before that though.
Well, Monday 30th and Tuesday 1st are ages away from each other, cos one of them's this month and the other's in October, so I'll have loads of time to rest in between.You're a proper social butterly. How do you cope with dealing with all those people?
Private developers, Curlew Alternatives Eighth Property LP, have been pushing for permission to build student accommodation on the site of the former Gamecock pub in Hulme for years.
Not only do these plans ignore the needs of the existing community in Hulme, but building a 9-storey block on this relatively tiny piece of land would completely overshadow the surrounding area. Development work would also create gridlock at this key public transport artery for the city.
These are just some of the reasons that the planning committee had previously refused the plans on four separate occasions.
But Manchester City Council allowed the developers to come back again and again. The planning office exploited the use of the Council’s own written constitution, telling the committee that they could only make a ‘minded to refuse’ verdict, effectively permanently deferring final refusal. This gave the developers an advantage.
Now, on the fifth attempt, the development has been given the green light.
We believe that this decision was made unlawfully, and we need your help to stop this development going ahead!
We need £10,000 to protect the campaign from adverse legal costs. Donate now and share our appeal with friends, family and colleagues.
“We were astonished when the Planning Committee went back on its previous view on this proposal. It feels like somebody bent the rules to get this through.”
What’s the issue?
Councils must follow rules and policies when they grant planning permission for new developments. This decision will send a signal to other developers that our communities are fair game.
We want to take the council to the High Court, challenging the decision on the following grounds:
This is not the first time that the council has allowed developers to make their case several times.
- Planning officers told the committee that there was no lawful reason for them to refuse the application, and that if they did want to refuse, they would have to be ‘minded to’ refuse again. This was wrong. Planning committees always have the power to refuse
- Planning officers seriously misled the committee - they said they could not refuse the application again.
- Planning officers failed to give reasons for deviating from a decision to refuse planning permission for a similar project on the same site in 2012. Planning law states that a local planning authority must show consistency in their decision-making
How can we trust that planning decisions will follow any due process if they can continue to apply to the planning committee until they get the answer they want?
What are we doing about it?
We’ve been fighting to stop profit-hungry developers from encroaching on our community for many years. We already have a plan that includes a social centre and social housing to serve the existing community.
We need the decision to build student accommodation here to be quashed, so that the community plan can be re-platformed as an alternative for the site.
“I have nothing against students - but we are losing our sense of community as students are transient and leave when their studies finish.”
Why do we need your support?
Public Interest Law Centre with the assistance of Greater Manchester Law Centre are supporting us with our legal case.
Our legal team is working on this challenge on a ‘conditional fee agreement’, meaning that the resident bringing the case will not be liable for legal costs.
We need to raise money to protect the resident from legal cost liability should the judicial review be unsuccessful.
We believe the council has granted permission unlawfully, and that we have a strong chance of success. However, this resident simply cannot afford to take the risk without your support.
For updates on the campaign, follow @blocktheblock1 and @gmtenantsunion.
Where will my money go?
All the money raised will go towards protecting this resident from adverse legal costs in the event that the challenge is unsuccessful.
As the PILC legal team are working pro bono on this case. Any remaining funds after all costs and disbursements will be used to cover some of their actual working time.
Should the challenge be successful, the donations made will be shared between PILC, Greater Manchester Tenants Union and Block the Block campaign, and put towards developing the alternative plan.
If you’d like further information about the case or have any questions, please do not hesitate to get in touch at office@pilc.org.uk.
Thinking about it, I imagine there must well be some urbs who might be able to contribute something to a documentary about the history of resistance to deportations in Hulme and Moss Side - would it be of any interest to The39thStep or Serge Forward, maybe? Again, there's still a bit of a frustrating lack of contact details for anyone actually involved in the project, but I think it's being made by Northern Light Films, who apparently have the email address bysshe.harkavy@northernlightfilm.org.Oh, while I remember, here's a Manc thing happening soon:
View attachment 441195
Can't fund much other public info about it so far but sure there should be more soon.
Yeah, I think hearing about that might've been the spark for the current interest in the campaign.Bugger. I've just looked him up on the internet and found that Viraj died last month Viraj Mendis - Wikipedia
References to the Israel-Gaza war were at the heart of the reasons behind the Royal Exchange Theatre’s cancellation of its updated production of A Midsummer Night’s Dream, The Stage understands.
It follows news, as revealed by The Stage earlier this week, that the show’s planned four-week run at the Manchester venue has been cancelled in its entirety.
Initially, the Royal Exchange said the show was only being "postponed", blaming "technical" problems. However, later, when confirming the entire cancellation, it said that a "number of issues" had led to the show being pulled.
The Stage understands from multiple sources close to the production that these issues were related to references to the Israel-Gaza war that had been inserted into this new version of Shakespeare’s play, which relocated the story to Manchester’s clubbing scene.
One of the points of contention is understood to have been the inclusion of "Free Palestine" graffiti, daubed on a piece of set. Meanwhile, the conflict is also understood to have been referenced in a rap that one of the rude mechanicals performed as part of the ‘play within the play’ in A Midsummer Night’s Dream.
The full details that led to the cancellation were not confirmed by the Royal Exchange when put to it by The Stage. The Stage has not been able to reach the production’s director Stef O’Driscoll, who was making her Royal Exchange debut with the production, for comment.
However, a spokesperson for the theatre said a "number of challenges" had led to the cancellation, including a delayed technical week and injuries in the cast.
“At the Royal Exchange Theatre we want to work with artists who address complex issues. Sadly, in a Midsumm:er Night’s Dream a number of challenges occurred which led to a decision to cancel the production – including injuries, a delayed technical week and changes late in the process. Despite our best efforts we were unable to get the show on as planned and took the difficult decision to cancel the production. Every effort was made to get the production on stage," a spokesperson said.
It is understood both O’Driscoll and many of the cast members were keen to stand by the content of the production, causing a dispute between the company and management: the "disagreement" referenced earlier this week by union Equity.
In a new statement, Equity said it was requesting an "urgent" meeting with the theatre to discuss the impact of the cancellation on its members.
The union also confirmed its members would be paid and would not be "out of pocket" following the cancellation of the show.
The statement said: "Equity has contacted the theatre requesting an urgent meeting to discuss the reasons for cancellation, the impact on our members and the steps being taken now. We remain very concerned about this situation and its impact on our members."