Casually Red
tomorrow belongs to me
streathamites tiffin gets rudely interrupted by johnny foreigner
agreed - but the falklanders are, very much so.- I don't think people were that bothered about them belonging to the UK -
sorry cyber, meant t'other one, the one with anti-brit prejudicesI'm CR, t'other un's C R
Except however obvious it may be to you, it clearly isn't to most others here, and you simply haven't made your case here - not at all. So all we're left with is a sort of mega-simplistic anti-imperialism-by-numbers; Wolfie Smith come to roost on U75
Equally, the holes that have been blown in your argument concerning the historical and geographical weakness of the argentinian case, the situation as pertained in '82 (basically, you'd have abandoned them to a murderous military tyranny), and the basic rights of falklanders - you just haven't answered those points, beyond the tired 'inbred anglophiles' sneer - as if that made their lives of less value than yours.
down under but remote from ozAnyway, in response to the OP, the main thing I recall was the rustle of atlases throughout the land as people asked "where the fuck are the Falklands?"
Oh come on his argument is based upon the "enemy of my enemy cant be bad (even if they are a right wing, colonial society)" conceptYou should know by now that Casually Red doesn't do the Falkland Islands debate very well at all.
I haven't read the whole thread but can almost guarantee that Red has been banging on about the proximity of the islands to the Argentine coast. That's all he had last time too. This, despite Argentina not having been formed at the time of first British settlement, and Argentina itself being the product of murderous imperialism which he claims he so despises!
Geographically the island belongs to Argentina.
Ireland did belong to Britain before independence in 1920s. And much of northern France was part of England in days of Joan of ArcGeographically, Ireland belongs to Britain.
Geographically, Britain belongs to France.
You were saying?
In the same way that something belongs to the thief that stole it.Ireland did belong to Britain before independence in 1920s. And much of northern France was part of England in days of Joan of Arc
and Argentina is what?In the same way that something belongs to the thief that stole it.
Your post has nothing to do with anything I said in mine, I was replying to mr blob.and Argentina is what?
Oh and who did the UK steal the Falklands from?
My first response is:Your post has nothing to do with anything I said in mine, I was replying to mr blob.
My first response is:
I have been drinking vodka with Russian squaddies all night
my second is
I was attempting to connect your response with the subject of the thread
I rest my case!
I'm amazed that this till has such a big draw, leading to so many comments! as I see it there are a number of issues;
1. They are presently ours, at the cost of many lives, both ours and Argentine, so they can sod off.
2. They don't have a president claim to the islands, no matter how close they are to the Argentine mainland.
3. The Stills still want to remain British.
4. If we drop them in the shit where do we stand when we want to represent Commonwealth citizens in other conflicts.
As pointed out on another thread there are two other major reasons - the belief in oil fields (since confirmed) and access to the Antarctic.
It doesn't matter if folk believe that proximity to the Argentine mainland is important, proximity to Antarctic is the trump card.
I'll throw in a South Georgia here. To all the defenders of the Argentine invasion of the Falklands, how do you explain South Georgia?
South Atlantic, but never mind. Care to explain under what claim Argentina invaded South Georgia?
My first response is:
I have been drinking vodka with Russian squaddies all night
Care to explain how they get the figs in fig rolls?
AKA transmission fluid from their truck.
Pffft Russian vodka has improved in leaps and bounds I'll have you know