Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

100,000+ new/well-paying jobs created through compassionate medical marijuana legislation

Your experiment was half an ounce applied with heat, with the patient claiming they noticed an effect. The experiments don't inspire confidence.

This is just the Jack Herer cult taken even further.

Dear Gentlegreen:

Walter did what he did for the purposes of obtaining the patent in 2000. Since then, technologies have advanced exponentially. The patent has remained dormant to today.

Very best,

JIm
 
Right then, that gives me the go-ahead to start developing an electronic spliff. It could go down well. All I need is to get a Presentation ready and hawk it around Cameron's friends and advisors.

Hocus Eye's E-Spliff​
The answer to all your pain relieving needs.​
Patent Pending.​
Accept no subsitutes.​

Of course the sensible answer would be to de-criminalise Cannabis so that those who wanted to use it for pain relief could do so. Getting anything approved for prescription use takes a ten year testing period. There are people right now who need it. I seriously doubt if any review of the law will result in such de-criminalisation during the remaining years of this government.​

Dear Hocus Eye:

We do not require FDA approval. The Patch is a holistic product that can be immediately made available in MM Dispensaries across the USA.

If the UK government approves MM Legislation, the Patch will automatically be a part of the Legislative approval.

Very best,

Jim
 
Dear Hocus Eye:

We do not require FDA approval. The Patch is a holistic product that can be immediately made available in MM Dispensaries across the USA.

If the UK government approves MM Legislation, the Patch will automatically be a part of the Legislative approval.

Very best,

Jim
Oh boy, you really are a bullshitter! :facepalm:
 
Oh boy, you really are a bullshitter! :facepalm:

Dear Hocus ZEye:

All I can say is that you obviously do not understand medical marijauna laws in the Medical Marijauna States. FDA approval is not required when the Patch is used for humans, however, FDA approval is required if the Patch is used for animal applications.

Very best,

Jim
 
Dear Jim

I think your assertions that FDA approval would only be required for use of the patch to treat animals is wrong. FDA approval is required for any new medical product for human use, especially as no clinical trials in animals or humans have yet been conducted according to your posts.

Legislative changes to legalise medical marijana do not mean that MM products for human use no longer require FDA approval.

How long do you think it will be before your product is market ready (animal or human use markets)?

Equationgirl
 
Dear Jim

I think your assertions that FDA approval would only be required for use of the patch to treat animals is wrong. FDA approval is required for any new medical product for human use, especially as no clinical trials in animals or humans have yet been conducted according to your posts.

Legislative changes to legalise medical marijana do not mean that MM products for human use no longer require FDA approval.

How long do you think it will be before your product is market ready (animal or human use markets)?

Equationgirl

Dear Equationgirl:

Medical marijuana in the form of dry bud or eatables have not received FDA approval in the USA, however, they are all sold everyday in MM Dispensaries across the country. The same is true for the Patch for human applications. It is but another delivery modality.

FDA approval is required for animal applications for the most part because of the equine industry (horse racing).

There are several MM products in the USA that are seeking FDA approval which is likely to be approximately 10 years in the future. The reason they are seeking FDA approval is so their products can be covered by major medical plans. Some could start selling a version of their product today, however, if they did, they would be infringing on our patent.

At the moment, with the exception of Colorado, you can grow MM in any medium (even "doggy-do" and then take it to a MM Dispensary for sale to MM Patients.

The foregoing is the reason why USA MM Legislation is flawed. The Industry has grown exponentially and State governmental bodies (moving at their usual dinosauric pace) are unable to get the Industry back under control.

Our presentation establishes a clear path to transparent, monitored control over all aspects of MM from seed to dispensary through a bar-code system and other cutting-edge Point-of-Sale technologies.

Very best,

Jim
 
Dear Jim

I think your assertions that FDA approval would only be required for use of the patch to treat animals is wrong. FDA approval is required for any new medical product for human use, especially as no clinical trials in animals or humans have yet been conducted according to your posts.

Legislative changes to legalise medical marijana do not mean that MM products for human use no longer require FDA approval.

How long do you think it will be before your product is market ready (animal or human use markets)?

Equationgirl

Dear Equationgirl:

If our capital needs are met in the next short while, we expect to have the human product available on MM Dispensary shelves by the end of Q2 in 2012. The animal applications will take considerably longer because of FDA approval.

Very best,

Jim
 
Dear Equationgirl:

If our capital needs are met in the next short while, we expect to have the human product available on MM Dispensary shelves by the end of Q2 in 2012. The animal applications will take considerably longer because of FDA approval.

Very best,

Jim

So ignoring the FDA approval question in your response then, Jim.

Have clinical trials been conducted on the human patch?
 
So ignoring the FDA approval question in your response then, Jim.

Have clinical trials been conducted on the human patch?

'Dear Equationgirl:

We are about to chose a delivery technology and then to move forward with perfection of the Patch. We are out in the US equity market seeking funding for perfection of the MM Patch. We expect to have funding in place by mid-November at the latest and then we are in the lab. The company who will ultimately own the patent and conduct the licensing of the product under the TETRACAN trade mark (USA) will likely be located in Portugal. We are arranging for multiple levels of corporate ownership to as much as possible mitigate the risk that the US Federal Government poses for this enterprise. Human trials will start as soon as we are in the Colorado lab facility.

Very best,

Jim
 
I've worked as a carer for someone with MS, she didn't have much problem sourcing a bit of green to ease the pain. If she were ever caught, I find it extremely unlikely that the old bill would prosecute.

Why turn cannabis into just another government taxable corporate shit pot when it currently exists as a possible means of income for musicians, hippies, un-employable and unwilling to be employable.

It would be cutting off another tentacle of the counterculture.

Fuck that.
 
I think the idea is to topically target specific groups of cannabinoid receptors associated with muscles etc, with THC as a means of avoiding getting the patient stoned - perhaps this treatment requires THC, but not the near equal amount of CBD as found in Sativex that might counter its effects...
 
I think the idea is to topically target specific groups of cannabinoid receptors associated with muscles etc, with THC as a means of avoiding getting the patient stoned - perhaps this treatment requires THC, but not the near equal amount of CBD as found in Sativex that might counter its effects...

Fear Gentlegreen:

You comments are bang on. Once we are in the lab, we will be developing the Patch to achieve pain relief (for example) without having the patient get "stoned". The Patch is the first true differentiation between the age old argument of "Marijuana Lifestyle" vs "Marijuana Medicinal Therapy". Those people who chose the Patch are using marijuana purely as a Medicinal Therapy.

Very best,

Jim
 
Fear Gentlegreen:

You comments are bang on. Once we are in the lab, we will be developing the Patch to achieve pain relief (for example) without having the patient get "stoned". The Patch is the first true differentiation between the age old argument of "Marijuana Lifestyle" vs "Marijuana Medicinal Therapy". Those people who chose the Patch are using marijuana purely as a Medicinal Therapy.

Very best,

Jim

"Fear" = "Dear" - sorry about that
 
:D
Oh right, I see, nice idea.
Not sure if they managed with cocaine or opium though.
Not being snide, good luck, maybe marijuana is different. :cool:
 
:D
Oh right, I see, nice idea.
Not sure if they managed with cocaine or opium though.
Not being snide, good luck, maybe marijuana is different. :cool:

Dear Chazegee:

Research in the lab will point us in the right direction to achieve the effect.

The Patch is a way to overcome (to a large extent) the "dosage" issued raised by governments across the globe. With the Patch, there is no argument about dosage and therefore, marijuana can begin to be seen as a holistic medicinal. No one living the Marijuana Lifestyle is going to chose the Patch. There is room for both, however, people who need help with their medical conditions deserve to have the Patch as part of their relief options without fear of prosecution. That is what we are ultimately trying to achieve with our Patent and the Presentation sent to Prime Minister Cameron.

Very best,

JIm
 
I guess you can get rid of the THC and keep the cannabinols. Still, I would abuse that patch anyday.
Infact I've been waiting for it all my life. :D
 
To be honest, I think any drug that can be used, or useful, can be abused, and not useful.
But tell the Government what you have to. :D
 
Out of curiosity, how are you getting the active ingredients into the patient? Do you use something like DMSO, or are you relying on the natural lipid solubility of the cannabidols? Also, do you have any RCTs or any other such studies proving the efficacy of the product? If not, why? What is the dose of actives in one patch, and how is this standardised?
 
Out of curiosity, how are you getting the active ingredients into the patient? Do you use something like DMSO, or are you relying on the natural lipid solubility of the cannabidols? Also, do you have any RCTs or any other such studies proving the efficacy of the product? If not, why? What is the dose of actives in one patch, and how is this standardised?

Dear Teepee:

The leading technology being considered is electrical stimulation using a new technology commercialized in 2010. It is ultra-thin, flexible electrical circuit which can be adapted to a patch application. DMSO will not be used is a delivery agent. The Patch will be perfected once we are in the Colorado Lab including dosage control (through variance in electrical stimulation) and/or other potential methodologies. Wedo not have all the answers yet, however, will as soon as we get into the Lab.

Very best,

JIm
 
Jim Alekson - I haven't read anything you've written, but fuck it - consider me in. Please post up your bank account and sort code and I will wire the monies directly into your bank account.
 
Back
Top Bottom