Mrs Magpie
On a bit of break...
God protect me from Party Types
Justin said:Why increasing? Unless employment in central London increases (which it may have done, but I've not heard that this is so) why would the demand for conveniently-situated housing increase? (In fact, as we know, the trend used to be in the opposite direction, with people who had cars moving out of London, as for instance my parents did in the mid-Seventies).
I hope that's not all 20 somethings still living with their parents.....Mr Retro said:The population of London is apparently going to increase by something like 500,000 + in the next 15 years.
It's like this all over London now. There are no "cheap areas" anymore - only expensive ones and really expensive ones.newbie said:If you came into the area from outside, and you're being priced out because you don't earn enough (as opposed to spending more earnings on other things), then surely you can move somewhere else- maybe back to wherever you moved here from?
It's like when the rich lecture the poor by saying the poor "need to start living in the real world".Justin said:What is the meaning of the term "unrealistic"? Isn't it always used to mean "the people at the bottom are expecting too much"? Isn't an equally reasonable use of the term "it's not realistic to expect people to put up with crap"? Or "it's not realistic to expect people to put up with crap - and then tell them to be 'realistic' without their getting the hump"?
What if you're doing a low-paid but very useful job?...we can't all be Key Workers in the present narrow definition of that term.newbie said:If you came into the area from outside, and you're being priced out because you don't earn enough (as opposed to spending more earnings on other things), then surely you can move somewhere else- maybe back to wherever you moved here from?
Mrs Magpie said:I certainly wouldn't want to flatshare. It's OK(ish) if you're young, but once you're over 35 you've had enough of pubes in the sugar bowl and terse notes over the washing-up.
In fact flatshares are dreadful. All my worst experiences have been in shared flats.
Indeed. A phrase I've heard used both by the current incumbent at Number Ten and by the predecessor that he most admires.poster342002 said:It's like when the rich lecture the poor by saying the poor "need to start living in the real world".
Justin said:Indeed. A phrase I've heard used both by the current incumbent at Number Ten and by the predecessor that he most admires.
Oooh, I do not think so, possibly not even if we're using "median". Average full-time salary in the whole country is about £26000 p.a. I believe. It's not going to be lower here.Bob said:£350-410 range of rent in Brixton - which is affordable (if not cheap) on average ish London earnings (eg. 18-22k)...
Yeah good idea I'll do it tomorrow.Hollis said:Maybe you should get hitched.
Mrs Magpie said:I'm above minimum wage, but I don't get paid during School Holidays. No one doing my job does these days...and no, I'm not a Dinner Lady!
tarannau said:I severely doubt that a significant proportion of those moving to Lambeth do so because it’s ‘vibrant’ – it may be a minor factor, but - like most others – the vast bulk of those moving here will do so because the area meets a combination of factors, probably far more to do with cost/location suitability than any notion of trendiness. And how do you protect locals in reality – do we just try and keep out the most recent incomers and youth … or do we prohibit any 'non-homegrown' Lambethonian from renting or purchasing anything in future to protect the stake of locals like me and you? It's just difficult to draw the line...
Mrs Magpie said:I certainly wouldn't want to flatshare. It's OK(ish) if you're young, but once you're over 35 you've had enough of pubes in the sugar bowl and terse notes over the washing-up.
In fact flatshares are dreadful. All my worst experiences have been in shared flats.
newbie said:I'd also go for improving the job prospects in places like West Somerset so that young people don't feel they have to leave to get on in life.
I think the definition of Key Worker varies from region to region - not sure about Lambeth, but a friend in Ealing qualifies, even though he works for Sky Television!Mrs Magpie said:What if you're doing a low-paid but very useful job?...we can't all be Key Workers in the present narrow definition of that term.
gaijingirl said:
Giles said:Pubes in the sugar-bowl? Christ, you must have had some strange house-mates! I've shared with people for ages and never had that one......
.
Things were different in the 1970s.......Giles said:Pubes in the sugar-bowl? Christ, you must have had some strange house-mates!
Orang Utan said:I think the definition of Key Worker varies from region to region - not sure about Lambeth, but a friend in Ealing qualifies, even though he works for Sky Television!
tarannau said:I have got a concern with the last sentence of your post though. I severely doubt that a significant proportion of those moving to Lambeth do so because it’s ‘vibrant’ – it may be a minor factor, but - like most others – the vast bulk of those moving here will do so because the area meets a combination of factors, probably far more to do with cost/location suitability than any notion of trendiness...
Mrs Magpie said:Things were different in the 1970s.......
What does he do? I must confess this has "scam" written all over it, but then again, it depends on who's doing the judging. My colleague opposite counts as a key worker with the housing association who he's just part-buying with, but not by any council.Orang Utan said:but a friend in Ealing qualifies, even though he works for Sky Television!
Hollis said:I'd say it has everything to do with 'vibrancy'... there's loads of other cheaper, accessible areas to live in.