bellaozzydog
rolling turds in glitter
longstanding agreed licence terms?
agreed with who?
which terms are being breached?
have you raised it with the establishment in question?
The venue licensee and London Burrough of Lambeth
longstanding agreed licence terms?
agreed with who?
which terms are being breached?
have you raised it with the establishment in question?
yeh. those aren't longstanding agreed licence terms but the actual conditions of the licence.
that doesn't answer which terms are being breached and whether you'd raised it with the establishment in question. some breaches will be more egregious and obvious to near-by residents than othersThe venue licensee and London Burrough of Lambeth
that doesn't answer which terms are being breached and whether you'd raised it with the establishment in question. some breaches will be more egregious and obvious to near-by residents than others
which terms are being breached?
which terms are being breached?
that's a pity, i thought you had a genuine beefIt was a hypothetical question, adding a single jigsaw piece to the overview of the situation
I have no knowledge of any residents complaints, communications with licensees or conditions for licences on any London venues.
I think it’s a reasonable question that anyone reviewing a situation such as the OP posted would ask to complete the picture, call it fact finding. Get all the information, Develop an informed decision/opinion
Just a thought.
Some gentrified wanker is complaining to the local council about venue A
Council reviews licence conditions to see if any are being broken, if none are being broken tell resident to poke it
If the council is squeezing longstanding venues and commercial rates are running venues out that’s a geographically specific big fat socio-economic can of worms i’m not getting dragged into
Evidence for what?Is there any evidence for this, or is it just hearsay?
that's a pity, i thought you had a genuine beef
Venue has been here over 30 years. A venue doesn't survive 30 years unless they are fully compliant with the local council. They've always been very considerate to the neighbours and have their sound levels checked regularly. They're not putting on louder nights, so nothing has really changed apart from cunts moving in opposite into the newly built flats.It was a hypothetical question, adding a single jigsaw piece to the overview of the situation
I have no knowledge of any residents complaints, communications with licensees or conditions for licences on any London venues.
I think it’s a reasonable question that anyone reviewing a situation such as the OP posted would ask to complete the picture, call it fact finding. Get all the information, Develop an informed decision/opinion
Just a thought.
Some gentrified wanker is complaining to the local council about venue A
Council reviews licence conditions to see if any are being broken, if none are being broken tell resident to poke it
If the council is squeezing longstanding venues and commercial rates are running venues out that’s a geographically specific big fat socio-economic can of worms i’m not getting dragged into
understand a little less and condemn a little moreNo beef
Think less read more
Evidence for what?
Tonight I learnt that some fucking shithead young professional couple who have moved into the new Lexadon flats on Coldharbour Lane have started repeatedly complaining to the council about the noise from the 414.
I know the owners well, as well you know, so there is no need to post up 'hearsay.' I talk to them directly. Why on earth would you think otherwise?How did you hear about it?
Venue has been here over 30 years. A venue doesn't survive 30 years unless they are fully compliant with the local council. They've always been very considerate to the neighbours and have their sound levels checked regularly. They're not putting on louder nights, so nothing has really changed apart from cunts moving in opposite into the newly built flats.
HOWEVER if some blow-in, self-entitled, selfish yuppie takes exception to the noise that the local community has been happy to live with for years - AND has the means to pursue it because they're loaded/well connected- there is a chance that fresh restrictions will be placed on the club, and that impacts on the livelihood of the owners and the community who use the club.
I live on Coldharbour Lane. There's been a fucking racket coming from several well known local venues/areas since the day I moved in, but I'd never complain because I moved into their community and I respect it.
There used to be a housing co-op/squats opposite the club for decades. Naturally no one complained because it was a community.the change is not who moved in to the flats, it's that homes have been built where previously there weren't homes.
Do you remember the Ministry of Sound having exactly this problem, and coming to a deal with the developer so that the leases precluded complaints about noise. Did the club object to the planning application, or approach the developers?
I'm not even sure if you can cite wanting to protect the sound from a nearby club as a planning objection.
???? I thought - but then I remembered when 306 Coldharbour Lane mounted a campaign, with petition (which I signed) about freight trains using the up-graded "Atlantic Lines" behind the houses on Coldharbour Lane.Same thing is happening with the railways. People are buying new luxury flats built on former railway land and then complaining about train noise
^this. Up to a couple of years ago I lived next to what had been a proper boozer until it reinvented itself as a destination venue which would hold events in the garden well into the early hours of the morning. When I phoned the venue to ask them to turn it down the DJ would mock the neighbours over the PA, and whenever I complained to Lambeth I'd get a response along the lines of "our officers attended the venue at 10:00am on Monday and could hear no evidence of noise nuisance". Lambeth are bloody useless.I’m surprised they managed to find anyone at the council to complain to. Last time time I looked there were no longer any noise officers available at night and complaints had to be registered via email and would be considered by officers.
They did with the flats built opposite Brixton Academy's loading bay on Stockwell Park Road, as i understand it they were only given planning permission on the understanding that the gigs would be loud, but more importantly the loadouts would be even louder and could and would happen at any point of the night / early morning and no complaints would be heard about it.There used to be a housing co-op/squats opposite the club for decades. Naturally no one complained because it was a community.
They were then flogged off as private flats and the lifestyle-seeking whiners moved in. They're now being joined by more unaffordable flats. I'm not even sure if you can cite wanting to protect the sound from a nearby club as a planning objection.
Don't you think this role should be taken over by Brixton BID?I’m surprised they managed to find anyone at the council to complain to. Last time time I looked there were no longer any noise officers available at night and complaints had to be registered via email and would be considered by officers. Multiple complaints from different households needed to be submitted. How noise breaches are now recorded and proven I’m unsure (or do they no longer need to be)? Residents should be able to complain about excessive noise if it affects them, but existing venues equally need to be able to continue their businesses. If they haven’t changed their noise levels and are managing entering and exiting patrons in he same way tough titty to the new residents - that’s what you moved in next to.
This is becoming a real headache issue for touring.loadouts would be even louder and could and would happen at any point of the night / early morning
This is becoming a real headache issue for touring.
Venues manage to negotiate a 11pm/midnight live music curfew, but then pay no attention to the logistics of getting a show out the door. Cue huge rows between venue staff and crew as we load the truck(s) a couple of hours later, which as you say can be a very noisy process indeed.
"Oh but you can't do that, we're not allowed to make noise past this time"
"Fuck off, we're doing it anyway, this kit has to be on a stage 150 miles away in 5 hours time"
They quite often create more direct noise into surrounding buildings than noise leaking from a venue - think lots of grumpy blokes shouting at each other, cases banging onto a metal trailer ramp etcSurely a load out doesn't qualify in terms of noise curfews. FFS
I had exactly the same with a venue which started to regularly blast the street with their doors wide open between 3-5am on a Wednesday morning. After about a year Lambeth agreed to investigate.^this. Up to a couple of years ago I lived next to what had been a proper boozer until it reinvented itself as a destination venue which would hold events in the garden well into the early hours of the morning. When I phoned the venue to ask them to turn it down the DJ would mock the neighbours over the PA, and whenever I complained to Lambeth I'd get a response along the lines of "our officers attended the venue at 10:00am on Monday and could hear no evidence of noise nuisance". Lambeth are bloody useless.