Giles said:
Well then the government should either build more houses, or allow more to be built, shouldn't they?
The idea that people owning a seaside cottage etc, causes homelessness, is rather like the "lump of labour" fallacy in economics - the idea that if the "work to be done" was shared out more fairly, then unemployment would disappear.
In a free society how could you stop people from owning more than one house or flat? Would married couples only be allowed one between them? What about buying places for sons/daughters, or other relatives?
Would you ban buy-to-let as well? Or just holiday homes?
Giles..
Dear oh dear, you've extrapolated a right old bag of bollocks from what I wrote, haven't you?
You fall back on the "seaside/holiday cottage" argument, which is inaccurate and irrational. "Weekend" homes don't have to be cottages, they don't have to be located anywhere near the sea. Oddly enough, inavariably they're neither, they're what used to be called "family homes" that originally housed (you guessed it!) families
all year round, not for 2 nights out of 7.
You tie the ownership of homes to the "lump of labour" argument, implyng that there's equivalence. Do more than imply please, give me some data that supports your argument. Personally I think your implication of equivalence is entirely fatuous, but I'm prepared to have you prove otherwise.
You then introduce a spurious "exercising one's right to own as much property as one wants" argument. Spurious because you're arguing from a position of claiming property rights without accepting that there are concomitant moral rights and responsibilities, you're asking for freedom to own as much property as you wish without the burdensome knowledge that you acquisitive instincts might cause families to fracture, or whole social groups to be riven.
Would I ban "buy to let"? Not outright, but I'd establish limits to holdings of developed property and put bureaucratic brakes (taxes and duties) on the amount of money people could expect from their property portfolio. Why? Because I'm a callous cunt riven by class-envy, obviously.