ViolentPanda
Hardly getting over it.
Canada has more rigid gun control laws
And stricter sentencing for infringement.
Canada has more rigid gun control laws
was a bit pants in 1776 running away when faced with the redcoats utterly failed in 1812 resulting in the whitehouse ending up flamabed and pretty useless in the american spanish war.
So the whole idea was obselte by the end of the 19th centuary.
If obama went crazy the US military would follow him rather than assorted "oath bearers" so your collection of army surplus tat and a rifle against a tank the tank wins.
If one side has an army and the other doesnt the side with the military wins so the red dawn fantasys are just that but the yanks end up with the mad shooting up schools. The paranoid shooting at strangers because they are scared.
I'm not saying that a buy back would be simple or easy to do. But it's not impossible.The forced buybacks in the UK weren't really massive - not in comparison to the size that any US buyback would be. The UK one encompassed about 1 point 2 million handguns and shotguns (semi-auto and pump-action with a capacity of more than three rounds). So, less than half of a percent of the size of a possible US buyback.
There's also an added problem regarding a US buyback: The tensions between federal and state gun laws.
I'm not calling for Americans to do anything, and I doubt they could even have gun control if they wanted to. I just find the nonsense about "I need my guns to protect against tyranny" . . . irritating.
I'm not saying that a buy back would be simple or easy to do, but not impossible.
I'm not saying that a buy back would be simple or easy to do. But it's not impossible.
Not that this link is in the slightest degree biased, but guns contributes $33bn and 220,000 jobs to the economy...
It is a fact though that guns are business and Americans love business, which is a driver.I'm not too sure where you're going with this...
It is a fact though that guns are business and Americans love business, which is a driver.
Of course it's impossible. It would provoke a revolution, and that's no exaggeration.
I don't think the abortion industry grosses $33bn a year. The gun industry drives the advertising and buys the politicians so you'd expect it to have an effect.Abortions are also business (in the US health care model) and the American conservative right aren't so keen on those. I think its an irrelevant angle.
Yes yes it is.
I don't think the abortion industry grosses $33bn a year. The gun industry drives the advertising and buys the politicians so you'd expect it to have an effect.
You'd have to resolve yourself to seeing hundreds of little Wacos if you tried a compulsory buy back. I don't think even those in favor of gun control would be willing to kill a couple thousand people implementing it.
Yeah, it's got to be politics of the possible. The country has between 30 and 50 per cent of all civilian guns in the world. You're not going to get rid of all those right away.You'd have to resolve yourself to seeing hundreds of little Wacos if you tried a compulsory buy back. I don't think even those in favor of gun control would be willing to kill a couple thousand people implementing it.
A couple of thousand? That's a smidge over two months of firearms homicides at the usual rate.
Not supporting such a thing, just trying to provide a little context.
Yeah, but some deaths have different meanings from others. Thousands killed by the state for refusing to hand over guns that many people in the country believe they have a right to own?A couple of thousand? That's a smidge over two months of firearms homicides at the usual rate.
Not supporting such a thing, just trying to provide a little context.
the 'and public support' bit is crucial here. Also, the mass shootings make the news, but most of the victims of gun crime in the US are young, black men, whose deaths barely even make the local news, let alone the international media. Ending their deaths is the main issue wrt gun crime in the US - and as in Brazil, talking about that without also talking about drugs and social deprivation is pointless.This is the country who decided to go and went to the moon within a decade. With political will and public support they can end mass shootings.
Yeah, but some deaths have different meanings from others. Thousands killed by the state for refusing to hand over guns that many people in the country believe they have a right to own?
On this at least, I agree with dwyer - it's an impossibility to disarm the US at the moment.
I'm aware of the stats. The people who own lots of guns see the gun violence issue as something that doesn't effect them. (For them, its a "black on black crime" issue as racist as that may be). If you brought the issue home to them, there'd be hell to pay.
Yeah, but some deaths have different meanings from others. Thousands killed by the state for refusing to hand over guns that many people in the country believe they have a right to own?
On this at least, I agree with dwyer - it's an impossibility to disarm the US at the moment.
This is the country who decided to go and went to the moon within a decade. With political will and public support they can end mass shootings.
I don't see the political will for space exploration either. More the pity.
These are all reasons why introducing gun control would not be 100% effective. that doesn't mean such a scheme shouldn't be inacted. If nothing else it would drastically reduce the numbers of guns.
I have been reading some comments on another site:
guns are not the problem, killers are
Killers only target schools because they can't fight back, get guns in schools and they will be safe!
Always the same sort of stuff, lunacy, I am so glad we didn't arm the population of my sons secondary school so that they would "be safe!" ..
This is the country who decided to go and went to the moon within a decade. With political will and public support they can end mass shootings.