danny la rouge
I have a cheese grater in the dishwasher.
We all deserve better, which is why it was removed.That's an awful statue. Doesn't he deserve better?
We all deserve better, which is why it was removed.That's an awful statue. Doesn't he deserve better?
Labour could form the first government of an independent Scotland in the event of a "Yes" vote in the referendum, a former SNP deputy leader has said.
Jim Sillars made the comments as he launched a new book, outlining a socialist vision for independence.
"Independence is not only for Scotland, but for the Labour Party too, and for socialists within it.
"Independence through a socialist programme will strengthen the position of working people and their families, and remove fear from their lives."
I agree. I also think that Scottish Labour is too moribund and ineffectual to win an election, and is in any case incapable of "outlining a socialist vision".Surely in the unlikely event of an independent Scotland the SNP would win the first election by a landslide as the victors and probably then lose the next one if the opposition got organised effectively due to disillousinment etc with all the inevitable cuts and chaos that would probably happen as they find it impossible to continue pleasing social democrats and free market liberals.
I'll review the book once I've read it. (I've got it on order).Sillars, ex Labour, maybe just trying to get the red monkeys to vote aye?
http://www.inplaceoffear.com/in-place-of-fear-ii-media/Sillars, ex Labour, maybe just trying to get the red monkeys to vote aye?
I'm not so sure of the significance of that poll, however the piece is right about something: the Yes camp is far more active than the No camp, which, despite Sasaferrato 's assurances, has not yet risen from its slumber.
Hardly a day goes by now when there isn’t a public meeting somewhere in Scotland organised by the Yes camp – there are actually likely to several, even dozens, on most days.
At each meeting, senior nationalists try the softly, softly approach, listening then putting their arguments across in as reasonable way as possible and it seems to be working – albeit slowly.
That is because the battle for Scotland’s future will not be won by the support of the committed voters of either side, it will be won by whoever manages to attract those 19 per cent of waverers in the middle.
That's true if the polls return to 60/40. But as long as the undecideds outnumber the gap, they need to wake up.if I've been following this correctly the better together lot don't need to do much of anything to scrape a narrow win- unless this complacency lets the indy campaign free ground to sway the undecideds in favour of independence.
if I've been following this correctly
Of course the media are biased. But it is correct that Yes is behind in the polls.Out of interest how have you been following this correctly?? If you are getting your info from the main stream media you will be getting biased info.
If you're ignoring mainstream media or polling you're insisting on getting biased partial info.Out of interest how have you been following this correctly?? If you are getting your info from the main stream media you will be getting biased info.
Out of interest how have you been following this correctly?? If you are getting your info from the main stream media you will be getting biased info.
polls, this thread and the main news- not that scottish independence has been huge news on our screens this last few months but I'm sure that'll change nearer to the vote itself
I'm not so sure of the significance of that poll, however the piece is right about something: the Yes camp is far more active than the No camp, which, despite Sasaferrato 's assurances, has not yet risen from its slumber.
Better Together, by stark contrast, is nowhere to be seen. This is now 2014. If it plans to awaken (if, that is, it has the personnel), then when is it going to do it?
I have literally no idea what you're on about. You have quoted me, and said I've asked a good question, but what you then write seems to be completely unconnected.Good question. The trouble is that the SNP have not published costed policy, and refuse to answer direct questions. I've e-mailed my MSP a number of times re the cost of a Scottish HMRC, the answer is that that is something to be addressed after a 'Yes' vote.
Public sector workers in Scotland (UK agencies) need to realise that after independence, they are jobless.
...The trouble is that the SNP have not...
Good question. The trouble is that the SNP have not published costed policy, and refuse to answer direct questions. I've e-mailed my MSP a number of times re the cost of a Scottish HMRC, the answer is that that is something to be addressed after a 'Yes' vote.
Public sector workers in Scotland (UK agencies) need to realise that after independence, they are jobless.
no, the trouble is that BT have not done anything - if BT were making, loudly and repeatedly, the point you've made then its rather unlikey that the 'yes' campaign would be doing as well as they are. but they're not...
blaming 'yes'/SNP for not producing detailed costing and not acknowledging any of the potential downsides of the policy they propose is like blaming a dog for pissing in a lampost - its what they do, they are politicians, they dont do costs, and they don't do downsides or risks. BT can expose the flaws/risks in SNP policy by asking these questions and getting resounding silence in response - but they don't, because as a political campaigning organisation BT is pretty crap. to use that delightful phrase, they couldn't talk a man out of a burning car...
BT's rubbishness is likely, imv, to lead to the worst possible result - as gosub suggests - that of a hairline result that satisfies nobody and leads to the question being asked again in 5 years. independance/union needs a big win to secure its legitimacy amongst its own people. BT are working hard to ensure that its going to be spectacularly close, and in my view, their poor campaigning might actually persuade what floating voters are left in mid-september to vote 'yes' out of shere spite.
I have literally no idea what you're on about. You have quoted me, and said I've asked a good question, but what you then write seems to be completely unconnected.
But hi. Hope you're well.
(Nice Union Jack colours, btw. Good touch). And your response to the bit in blue is: "The trouble is that the SNP have not published costed policy, and refuse to answer direct questions".Better Together, by stark contrast, is nowhere to be seen. This is now 2014. If it plans to awaken (if, that is, it has the personnel), then when is it going to do it?
My reply was in response to the above, especially the last eight words.