Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Will you vote for independence?

Scottish independence?

  • Yes please

    Votes: 99 56.6%
  • No thanks

    Votes: 57 32.6%
  • Dont know yet

    Votes: 17 9.7%

  • Total voters
    175
Scottish independence: Jim Sillars says Labour 'could lead post yes Scotland' http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-scotland-politics-25859521

Labour could form the first government of an independent Scotland in the event of a "Yes" vote in the referendum, a former SNP deputy leader has said.

Jim Sillars made the comments as he launched a new book, outlining a socialist vision for independence.

"Independence is not only for Scotland, but for the Labour Party too, and for socialists within it.

"Independence through a socialist programme will strengthen the position of working people and their families, and remove fear from their lives."
 
Surely in the unlikely event of an independent Scotland the SNP would win the first election by a landslide as the victors and probably then lose the next one if the opposition got organised effectively due to disillousinment etc with all the inevitable cuts and chaos that would probably happen as they find it impossible to continue pleasing social democrats and free market liberals.
 
Surely in the unlikely event of an independent Scotland the SNP would win the first election by a landslide as the victors and probably then lose the next one if the opposition got organised effectively due to disillousinment etc with all the inevitable cuts and chaos that would probably happen as they find it impossible to continue pleasing social democrats and free market liberals.
I agree. I also think that Scottish Labour is too moribund and ineffectual to win an election, and is in any case incapable of "outlining a socialist vision".

I'll read Jim's book anyway, to see what he has to say.
 
Sillars, ex Labour, maybe just trying to get the red monkeys to vote aye? :hmm:
I'll review the book once I've read it. (I've got it on order).

I met Sillars during the poll tax fight, and had a lot of time for him. He put in a lot of work then, and was a powerful speaker. He disappointed me with the "90 min nationalists" rant after the 92 election. He was always worth listening to, though, even when he was wrong.

(My dad was keen on Sillars' ill-fated SLP in the 70s, as I think I have said on the boards before).
 
http://blog.whatscotlandthinks.org/2014/01/icm-poll-shows-biggest-swing-yet/

ICM Poll Shows Biggest Swing Yet

One of the most remarkable features of the referendum campaign polls so far has been their stability from one reading to the next. Almost every company’s poll has reported more or less the same proportion of people saying they will vote Yes (and No) as did the last poll conducted by that same company. Now, however, that pattern has finally been broken.

In a poll conducted for Scotland on Sunday and the first nationwide poll to be conducted since Christmas, ICM report that 37% think they will vote Yes this coming September, up five points on its previous poll back in September last year. Conversely, support for No is put at 44%, down five points

[...]

That swing on the economy clearly matters. No less than 88% of those who think independence would be good for the economy anticipate voting Yes, while 87% of those who reckon it would be bad say they will vote No.

In responding to the publication of the latest Scottish Social Attitudes results, the SNP Deputy First Minister, Nicola Sturgeon, stated the survey indicated that, ‘when we win the economic argument, we will win the referendum’. Indeed so – if the Yes side can win that argument victory could well be theirs. Presumably, we can now expect much more effort from it on that front.
 
I'm not so sure of the significance of that poll, however the piece is right about something: the Yes camp is far more active than the No camp, which, despite Sasaferrato 's assurances, has not yet risen from its slumber.

Hardly a day goes by now when there isn’t a public meeting somewhere in Scotland organised by the Yes camp – there are actually likely to several, even dozens, on most days.

At each meeting, senior nationalists try the softly, softly approach, listening then putting their arguments across in as reasonable way as possible and it seems to be working – albeit slowly.

That is because the battle for Scotland’s future will not be won by the support of the committed voters of either side, it will be won by whoever manages to attract those 19 per cent of waverers in the middle.

Better Together, by stark contrast, is nowhere to be seen. This is now 2014. If it plans to awaken (if, that is, it has the personnel), then when is it going to do it?
 
if I've been following this correctly the better together lot don't need to do much of anything to scrape a narrow win- unless this complacency lets the indy campaign free ground to sway the undecideds in favour of independence.
 
if I've been following this correctly the better together lot don't need to do much of anything to scrape a narrow win- unless this complacency lets the indy campaign free ground to sway the undecideds in favour of independence.
That's true if the polls return to 60/40. But as long as the undecideds outnumber the gap, they need to wake up.
 
polls, this thread and the main news- not that scottish independence has been huge news on our screens this last few months but I'm sure that'll change nearer to the vote itself


It is very weird on days where I've been England and Scotland in the same day in the last few months to look at the media. The complete disinterest in southern editions of the same paper should be a strong argument for the Yes side.

With reference to your earlier query about NO squeaking home, is still looking like that, but probably the worst thing that can happen -becomes an itch that will be scratched again in short order. Yes only have to win once, regardless of the margin (technically it would be twice cos of the 79 shenanigans)
 
I'm not so sure of the significance of that poll, however the piece is right about something: the Yes camp is far more active than the No camp, which, despite Sasaferrato 's assurances, has not yet risen from its slumber.



Better Together, by stark contrast, is nowhere to be seen. This is now 2014. If it plans to awaken (if, that is, it has the personnel), then when is it going to do it?

Good question. The trouble is that the SNP have not published costed policy, and refuse to answer direct questions. I've e-mailed my MSP a number of times re the cost of a Scottish HMRC, the answer is that that is something to be addressed after a 'Yes' vote.

Public sector workers in Scotland (UK agencies) need to realise that after independence, they are jobless.
 
Good question. The trouble is that the SNP have not published costed policy, and refuse to answer direct questions. I've e-mailed my MSP a number of times re the cost of a Scottish HMRC, the answer is that that is something to be addressed after a 'Yes' vote.

Public sector workers in Scotland (UK agencies) need to realise that after independence, they are jobless.
I have literally no idea what you're on about. You have quoted me, and said I've asked a good question, but what you then write seems to be completely unconnected.

But hi. Hope you're well.
 
...The trouble is that the SNP have not...

no, the trouble is that BT have not done anything - if BT were making, loudly and repeatedly, the point you've made then its rather unlikey that the 'yes' campaign would be doing as well as they are. but they're not...

blaming 'yes'/SNP for not producing detailed costing and not acknowledging any of the potential downsides of the policy they propose is like blaming a dog for pissing in a lampost - its what they do, they are politicians, they dont do costs, and they don't do downsides or risks. BT can expose the flaws/risks in SNP policy by asking these questions and getting resounding silence in response - but they don't, because as a political campaigning organisation BT is pretty crap. to use that delightful phrase, they couldn't talk a man out of a burning car...

BT's rubbishness is likely, imv, to lead to the worst possible result - as gosub suggests - that of a hairline result that satisfies nobody and leads to the question being asked again in 5 years. independance/union needs a big win to secure its legitimacy amongst its own people. BT are working hard to ensure that its going to be spectacularly close, and in my view, their poor campaigning might actually persuade what floating voters are left in mid-september to vote 'yes' out of shere spite.
 
Good question. The trouble is that the SNP have not published costed policy, and refuse to answer direct questions. I've e-mailed my MSP a number of times re the cost of a Scottish HMRC, the answer is that that is something to be addressed after a 'Yes' vote.

Public sector workers in Scotland (UK agencies) need to realise that after independence, they are jobless.

I suspect they've decided to keep as low as profile as possible for as long as possible lest their media campaign lest ridiculous hyperbole like the above last line is let loose and they end up a laughing stock and undermining their own aims.
 
no, the trouble is that BT have not done anything - if BT were making, loudly and repeatedly, the point you've made then its rather unlikey that the 'yes' campaign would be doing as well as they are. but they're not...

blaming 'yes'/SNP for not producing detailed costing and not acknowledging any of the potential downsides of the policy they propose is like blaming a dog for pissing in a lampost - its what they do, they are politicians, they dont do costs, and they don't do downsides or risks. BT can expose the flaws/risks in SNP policy by asking these questions and getting resounding silence in response - but they don't, because as a political campaigning organisation BT is pretty crap. to use that delightful phrase, they couldn't talk a man out of a burning car...

BT's rubbishness is likely, imv, to lead to the worst possible result - as gosub suggests - that of a hairline result that satisfies nobody and leads to the question being asked again in 5 years. independance/union needs a big win to secure its legitimacy amongst its own people. BT are working hard to ensure that its going to be spectacularly close, and in my view, their poor campaigning might actually persuade what floating voters are left in mid-september to vote 'yes' out of shere spite.

God forbid. I fear you may be right though. The other huge danger is that people who do support don't bother to vote, because it is a foregone conclusion.
 
I have literally no idea what you're on about. You have quoted me, and said I've asked a good question, but what you then write seems to be completely unconnected.

But hi. Hope you're well.

Better Together, by stark contrast, is nowhere to be seen. This is now 2014. If it plans to awaken (if, that is, it has the personnel), then when is it going to do it?

My reply was in response to the above, especially the last eight words.
 
Better Together, by stark contrast, is nowhere to be seen. This is now 2014. If it plans to awaken (if, that is, it has the personnel), then when is it going to do it?

My reply was in response to the above, especially the last eight words.
(Nice Union Jack colours, btw. Good touch). And your response to the bit in blue is: "The trouble is that the SNP have not published costed policy, and refuse to answer direct questions".

So, BT can't start campaigning locally in communities about the benefits of the Union, because the SNP hasn't published costed plans. (For what, btw? Its first term in government? The cost of transition? The cost of the Better Together local meetings? What?)
 
Back
Top Bottom