Yep. Weird how sudden a change of opinion between the 16-24s and the 25-34s.
...no.Weird enough to cast suspicion on the entire poll, in fact.
...no.
A 20% disparity between 16-24 and 25-34 means something has gone terribly wrong.
2) In most cases, polls are only weighted to be representative at a national level, not for sub-breaks. In other words, when you look at the tables, for the totals you can be sure that they are based on a sample with the right proportions of old and young people, men and women. However, if you look at the column for men on the table, it doesn’t necessarily follow that it contains the right proportion of old and young men – because polls are only weighted at a national level, it could be that all the old people in the sample were women and all the young people men.
That’s an extreme example and it is always the case – MORI’s quotas for age, gender and work status are all interlocked, YouGov’s quotas for age and gender are interlocked – but as a general rule be a bit cautious of sub-breaks.
Just a thought, but schools will be back on polling day. Will pupils be given time to go and vote?
why, adults don't get time off work to vote, they just keep the booths open till about 9 pm
I can see they've been really poor all the way from bristol - god knows how they've rubbed people up the wrong way inn Scotland. every intervention has been terrible. The best you can say for it is that aprt from two spurts they've not really bothered (agai, as seen from bristol but following pretty closely), relying instead on the vote just not dropping enough. AV YES were worse as they were sticking their nose in everywhere.
Also - a "no" vote is not a vote for the Better Together campaign, just as a "yes" vote is not a vote for the SNP.
Any other participants in what? The BT campaign, or the UK electoral system in perpetuity?A no vote is a vote for basically Labour, Tories, or the far-right (maybe a few Lib Dems dotted about). If you're honest, there is not really any other participants. Labour have even campaigned with their own logos incidentally, not as better together.
I have friends who are voting No. I say "friends"... I mean mortal enemies I will never speak to again. And may kill.There was just an interesting program on BBC R4 about the debate and how many families and friends are split over it. Asking things like will you be friends after the votes have been counted.
Whichever way the result goes, the next day, week, year people will have to get on with each other.I have friends who are voting No. I say "friends"... I mean mortal enemies I will never speak to again. And may kill.
That's not an interesting programme, it's a stupid fucking premise.
Whichever way the result goes, the next day, week, year people will have to get on with each other.
I was in Scotland a few times in the last months and it was interesting how many people didn't really want to talk about their voting intentions seemingly because they didn't want an argument.
Whichever way the result goes, the next day, week, year people will have to get on with each other.
I was in Scotland a few times in the last months and it was interesting how many people didn't really want to talk about their voting intentions seemingly because they didn't want an argument.
Any other participants in what? The BT campaign, or the UK electoral system in perpetuity?
Are you saying that as a Yes voter, or not ??Both. Better Together are relying on a very strange group of people to carry them over the line. A fair few old Labour folk that don't really think much about the referendum too much. Apart from that, its basically conservatives and bigots.
You are talking as if BT campaign members = No voters.Both. Better Together are relying on a very strange group of people to carry them over the line. A fair few old Labour folk that don't really think much about the referendum too much. Apart from that, its basically conservatives and bigots.