it's a public debate, not a dialectic. You have to have the crowd as well as the argument.
it's a public debate, not a dialectic. You have to have the crowd as well as the argument. And salmond hasn't lost it once yet, whereas darling darling is clearly rattled.
TBF if my case for no to indy was that shit I would also get crapped on.
Quite right, and Darling isn't doing it.
I don't think Darling is coming off as badly as you think he is. But I'm not really impressed with either so far.
Rhetoric works. For example, those comments about driving on the right and space aliens all served a purpose. Loads of purposes. It made the opposition look frivolous, it lightened the mood and played to audience after the currency bit, it allowed Salmond to look relaxed, and loads of other stuff. Notice how it was in a three? It's because good rhetoric really does work.
Not what the insta-polls on here suggestthis is what happens when you field a twonky b-lister against a brawler
looks a bit too rehearsed to me. I'm worried he might take off his tie.look at how salmond makes a step past his podium to address a question. Thats working it.
I thought that was a bit cheap actually .... rehearsed ..look at how salmond makes a step past his podium to address a question. Thats working it.
scots people are non working lazies who need propping up. Good strike there darling darling.
He didn't say that. He pointed out that there was a growing older population.