Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Why the lib-dems are shit

I wonder what Mr Richard Dawkins as someone with an admirable interest in getting the wider public involved in academic study thinks of the lib-dems today?
 
Child poverty to worsen under coalition, says IFS

But the IFS said it expected both absolute and relative poverty among children and working-age adults to rise between the 2010-11 and 2013-14 financial years.

"Among all children and working-age individuals, we forecast a rise in relative poverty of about 800,000 and a rise in absolute poverty of about 900,000 between 2010-11 and 2013-14," said Robert Joyce, author of the IFS report.

"We find that the coalition government's measures act to increase poverty among these groups slightly in 2012-13, and more clearly in 2013-14," he added.

The coalition promised after it came to power in May it would maintain the Child Poverty Act's goal of ending child poverty in Britain by 2020.
 
I really don't think anyone could of been more right about anything as you were about the Lib Dems :D And I bloody voted for them :facepalm:
 
164803_591854659215_285402750_5200735_1096891_n.jpg


:)
 
In Sheffield the Lib Dems are so committed to consultation that they've just abandoned it; consultation procedures much trumpeted in the authority's Sheffield Compact have been ditched, so that 15% cuts to the voluntary sector can be pushed through for the coming year (these are disproportionate to the 28% overall budget cuts handed down from central government over the next three years).

Louis MacNeice
 
This is how you cut back on public spending via cuts - unemployment goes up, tax revenue goes down, more is paid out in social security, less is spent on shops and serives, more unemployed = public borrowing higher than expected at £23.3bn - up from £17.4bn in same period last year. Of course, for these winter-fuel allowance cutting fuckwits this can only mean one thing - the cuts haven't been deep or broad enough.
 
I really don't think anyone could of been more right about anything as you were about the Lib Dems :D And I bloody voted for them :facepalm:

My sister did too, whilst having a go at me not for voting and saying she was voting libdem because "we can't let the tories in" :facepalm: all round.
 
My sister did too, whilst having a go at me not for voting and saying she was voting libdem because "we can't let the tories in" :facepalm: all round.
She shouldn't blame herself. To a large swathe of the voters, especially those who are understandably disgusted with Labour but can't bear the thought of a Tory govt - they sounded incredibly plausible and credible. Fortunately, you can only really play that trick once.
 
This is how you cut back on public spending via cuts - unemployment goes up, tax revenue goes down, more is paid out in social security, less is spent on shops and serives, more unemployed = public borrowing higher than expected at £23.3bn - up from £17.4bn in same period last year. Of course, for these winter-fuel allowance cutting fuckwits this can only mean one thing - the cuts haven't been deep or broad enough.
a repeat of the early 1990s all over again, with the exception that Clarke was more of a keynesianite reflationist
 
Back
Top Bottom