Absolute 100% misrepresentation of my position - a pretty shabby way of arguing. I am arguing *against* the coalition and the LD role within it - but arguing that it would easier to sweep both parties out of office (a majority Labour government) if voters in Con/LD marginals had the option of demonstrating their political opposition to the LDs and the coalition AND still being able to cast an effective anti-Tory vote - which is where AV comes in.
But of course I'm NOT arguing a Labour majority per se is hardly a guarantee of stopping the cuts or transforming society (as if) , it is just the least worst outcome. Which is among the reasons I want to see a mass movement outside parliament emerge NOW (*not* wait until the next general election) to build an irresistable force that shifts Labour to the left. And I'd like to see independent left candidates, trade union candidates, single issue protests etc have the room to stand without automatically being squeezed by the tactical wish to avoid splitting the Labour vote and letting in LD/Cons.
Attacking the coalition yes, but doing it intelligently - seizing on something that is *tactically* useful that the contradictions of the coalition have brought forward, while keeping up political opposition.
If you want to disagree with me - fine - but do it on the basis of what I'm actually arguing not some fantasy "don't attack the liberals" position that is a million miles away from my position.