He's deputy PM and fat cunt but in these troubled days of terrorism, major middle east problems and old Tony sodding off on holiday he's hidden in a back office somewhere.
He's supposed to be in charge so what the fuck is the fat cunt doing ?
Where is he ?
- Thread starter big footed fred
- Start date
He's deputy PM and fat cunt but in these troubled days of terrorism, major middle east problems and old Tony sodding off on holiday he's hidden in a back office somewhere.
He's supposed to be in charge so what the fuck is the fat cunt doing ?
tbaldwin said:
I'll bury them in his bollocks first
Bigdavalad
New Member
He's not trusted to do anything as he's such a useless cunt and embarassment to the Government, but His Tonyness can't sack him because he knows all the dirt.
Streathamite
ideological dogmatist
also, the idea is they go together, as the LP is trembling in fear at the thought of contested internal elections right now.
Bigdavalad said:
Don't think it's the dirt that keeps him in a job.
Think how much you don't notice the smell if someone farts next to a sewage farm.
2 jags is Tony's sewage farm.
Bigdavalad
New Member
After seeing her on the news tonight, I have another question - how long has Margaret Beckett been dead?
Fisher_Gate
Active Member
Unfortunately he turned up on BBC News 24 just after 7pm this evening 
The matter which the Government is now very involved with comes under the authority of the Home Office, not the Office of the Deputy PM.
TeeJay said:
Even if Tony Blair was in Downing Street it would still be Dr. Reid who would be in charge.
I think "patronising" would be how I'd describe the few seconds of his speech I witnessed while trying to switch channels.Fisher_Gate said:Unfortunately he turned up on BBC News 24 just after 7pm this evening
Normally he's quite robust in his language, but today was weird.
the triteness of his speech reminded me of the kind of hollow, meaningless, over-repeated nonsense that our friends in America are subjected to from their almost totally redundant President. it took him far too long to tell us nothing. whatever you think of Blair, he at least tries to imagine that the British public aren't all as thick as short planks and bullshits us with fancy language and slightly more than simplistic concepts and arguments. who the fuck did prescott think he was talking to?
JHE
.
Sneering and jeering at Prescott seems to be a bit of a national pastime. Over the last months I have come across I-don't-know-how-many-dozens of newspaper pieces mocking him and rubbishing him. Some have been funny. Others have just been so snobby and nasty that the joke's on the writers rather than on their target.
A couple of years ago, after some Commons session in which Prescott had again given some utterly garbled speech, he was interviewed on the Today programme about his latest balls-up. He reminded the interviewer that he (Prescott) had not always been a politician and said that when people knocked him, he just reminded himself that it's still "better than working for a living".
A couple of years ago, after some Commons session in which Prescott had again given some utterly garbled speech, he was interviewed on the Today programme about his latest balls-up. He reminded the interviewer that he (Prescott) had not always been a politician and said that when people knocked him, he just reminded himself that it's still "better than working for a living".
Prescott symbolises everything that is wrong with British politics. We should all be irritated by the fact that the tenure of a Prime Minister can so easily be brought to a (long overdue) halt by a fat, useless, hypocritical twat, masquerading as a socialist. Having said that, he should do the sensible thing and resign so that we can nob two birds with one johnny. Then all we need to do is find a way of throwing Brown into prison for a very long time. His crimes as Chancellor should really be enough.
TeeJay said:
2 jags is fat as a result of too many tripe sarnies and being lazy.
If a tory is a little plump it's just good living. After all he deserves fine food as a reward for his efforts in life.
<waits for it>
TeeJay said:
What do you have an issue with - me making a jibe about Prescott's more than passing resemblance to Jabba the Hutt or are you suggesting that I might be a Tory? His obesity is the icing on the cake (and i'm sure he likes cakes) as far his public image is concerned. Aswell as being overindulgent (with cakes and women), abusive of his public position and useless for anything other than keeping a link between Tony and the old style socialists, he is a fatty. His fatness is perfectly in keeping with his character. Some fatties are perfectly pleasant people and for this reason I've tried my best to find his redeeming qualities as a politician. He doesn't actually have any. He is a fat jabba and he is useless to us.
There is plenty to criticise politically without launching into offensive tirades about "fatties" (ones which make your comments about "socialism" look very shallow). Have a look at this thread and you might see how many people here feel about this:
obesity: a lack of self-responsibility?
obesity: a lack of self-responsibility?
I have made no disparaging comments whatsoever regarding socialism nor can you point to anything I have posted that would seriously suggest that I am making making statements against socialism. I am merely relating to you an observation of what John Prescott is (a link to the old socialists that keep Blair in power).
Did it ever occur to you that my 'shallow' comments were designed to be exactly that? Why are you determined to focus on fatties? He is indeed fat and I admit, it is of little importance but he deserves people taking the piss out of him on a regular basis. Nevertheless, the fact that such a fat (and useless) man with such a poor track record is second in command of the country is very amusing to me. I'm sorry if that makes me a bad person, but i find his fatness amusing given all we know about him. I hope I'm not hurting John's feelings.
I read a few posts of the obesity thread and it went as I expected - name calling and the like. If I was at all interested in replying to it, what I would say is that obesity costs the NHS perhaps half a billion pounds a year and costs the UK as much as £2 billion a year in lost output and possibly 18 million days a year in lost work. I would also suggest that this problem is getting worse but actually I don't give that much of a shit. I accept that people are free to eat what they want and we all pay into a pot which treats us for various maladies which are often self-inflicted. I'm quite benevolent in that respect. I'm having treatment for playing too much football at the cost of the taxpayer so it is only right that I contribute towards those who indulge in too many pies and chip butties. Of course there are those who are pre-programmed to become fat and I have sympathy with them.
I apologies for digressing so I'll get back to the topic - Prezza is fat and useless.
Did it ever occur to you that my 'shallow' comments were designed to be exactly that? Why are you determined to focus on fatties? He is indeed fat and I admit, it is of little importance but he deserves people taking the piss out of him on a regular basis. Nevertheless, the fact that such a fat (and useless) man with such a poor track record is second in command of the country is very amusing to me. I'm sorry if that makes me a bad person, but i find his fatness amusing given all we know about him. I hope I'm not hurting John's feelings.
I read a few posts of the obesity thread and it went as I expected - name calling and the like. If I was at all interested in replying to it, what I would say is that obesity costs the NHS perhaps half a billion pounds a year and costs the UK as much as £2 billion a year in lost output and possibly 18 million days a year in lost work. I would also suggest that this problem is getting worse but actually I don't give that much of a shit. I accept that people are free to eat what they want and we all pay into a pot which treats us for various maladies which are often self-inflicted. I'm quite benevolent in that respect. I'm having treatment for playing too much football at the cost of the taxpayer so it is only right that I contribute towards those who indulge in too many pies and chip butties. Of course there are those who are pre-programmed to become fat and I have sympathy with them.
I apologies for digressing so I'll get back to the topic - Prezza is fat and useless.
In fact my posts imply the opposite - that your comment "masquerading as a socialist" suggests you think he has sold out socialism, but that your seeming lean towards socialism would be "shallow" in light of your crass and offensive comments aimed at the unfortunate and disadvantaged.MonkeyMagic said:
It isn't Prescott feelings that I am concerned about - I linked to the other thread to show you how upset people here get by this kind of unpleasant shit.
Its up to you whether you pay any attention and avoid the consequences.
I have no political leaning at all. I have no interest in joining the left or right club.
I think you are suggesting to me that posting 'fatty' is offensive to people on this site. I apologise if that is the case as I had no idea that people were so sensitive to the caricaturization of John Prescott.
'Fatty' can be a term of endearment. My mother is one and I love her. Equally my dog is one and he's my most prized possession. Perhaps I'm one too?
I think you are suggesting to me that posting 'fatty' is offensive to people on this site. I apologise if that is the case as I had no idea that people were so sensitive to the caricaturization of John Prescott.
'Fatty' can be a term of endearment. My mother is one and I love her. Equally my dog is one and he's my most prized possession. Perhaps I'm one too?
Now, now, let's not be silly. That's impossible.TeeJay said:
Prescott was included in the New Labour project as a sop to 'old Labour.' He was perceived as being towards the more socialist end of the party, so including him helped to neutralise discontent from the left. That facade has worn increasingly thin as he's gone along with all of Blair's most right-wing schemes: these days, he's just seen as a tired old hypocrite.
The reasons they keep him on as deputy PM are that a) he does seem to be quite good at banging heads together, especially the PM and Chancellor's when they start arguing; b) if he were to lose the deputy leadership of the Labour Party (which he would if he were no longer deputy PM) there'd be a contest for it, which Blair wants to avoid since that could lead to a challenge on the leadership too, and c) he knows where the bodies are buried.
Tbh, sniping at Prescott isn't worth the effort. He has little real power any more.
The reasons they keep him on as deputy PM are that a) he does seem to be quite good at banging heads together, especially the PM and Chancellor's when they start arguing; b) if he were to lose the deputy leadership of the Labour Party (which he would if he were no longer deputy PM) there'd be a contest for it, which Blair wants to avoid since that could lead to a challenge on the leadership too, and c) he knows where the bodies are buried.
Tbh, sniping at Prescott isn't worth the effort. He has little real power any more.
Similar threads
