This. I don't respond to every post.I haven’t. But you’ve not said anything I can respond to
This. I don't respond to every post.I haven’t. But you’ve not said anything I can respond to
The older I get, the more certain scenes of Band Candy at the Bronze seem like nothing to bat an eyelid at."Hush" and "Band Candy". Though watching them without any prior knowledge of the characters probably wouldn't work.
"Once More, with Feeling" - marmite
For shame. This is just plain wrong.d) don’t watch Angel. It’s shite.
Kiss rocks!The older I get, the more certain scenes of Band Candy at the Bronze seem like nothing to bat an eyelid at.
Why? Aren’t we trying to persuade him to continue watching?(I was going to suggest danny la rouge might prefer Angel.)
He’s a handsome young man, is for sure.
Yes, but tbf I thoroughly and unironically enjoyed Never Have I Ever in my early 40s soI’m going to take a wild guess and speculate that most Buffy fans here are between 30-45 years old.
I am definitely too old for it. It wasn’t something my peers were watching IIRC.
I don’t know how people get the time to get into their own demographic’s tv shows let alone other generations’Yes, but tbf I thoroughly and unironically enjoyed Never Have I Ever in my early 40s so
I’m going to take a wild guess and speculate that most Buffy fans here are between 30-45 years old.
I am definitely too old for it. It wasn’t something my peers were watching IIRC.
You’re younger than me by a distance!I’m going to take a wild guess and speculate that most Buffy fans here are between 30-45 years old.
I am definitely too old for it. It wasn’t something my peers were watching IIRC.
Yes, I don’t know what your excuse isYou’re younger than me by a distance!
(Not a very long distance, but still)
HH was pretty mediocre from what I remember. Australian Hollyoaks.Shame Heartbreak High never gained this traction
My point is that it was on when I had a lot of time to watch telly. It didn’t have to be good. It just had to be on telly in the early evening.HH was pretty mediocre from what I remember. Australian Hollyoaks.
Because I have taste, muckle flugga. It was also a good time for me to watch TV. mrsb and I rather bonded over, what must have been, the repeats of the series in the run up to the finale in....2004? So, that was nice. Especially as the only other female led drama on at the time, that wasn't completely abysmal shit was Sex and the City*. Comparatively, I think you can see why I have more than a spot spot for Buffy.Yes, I don’t know what your excuse is
I think you have answered your own question in your first sentence. It hasn't really aged well.
From the thread ^.It’s got unrealistic CGI, wooden dialogue, daytime soap acting, melodrama, and a bonkers plot. It’s terrible. I love it.
I meant to reply to this.I've just googled La Brea and it looks like something I might watch. Was it good?
As a (now) librarian with ADHD, I was destined to never be anything but Xander and Giles.The four ages of Buffy (for a bloke, at least). They can all occur within any given five minute period.
First, you identify with Spike (or Angel, if you're weird), the cool rebel,
Then you ponder for a moment and think, okay, you are (the powerless but ultra-reliable) Xander,
Then you recall something from the seventies and think you're Giles.
Before, finally, looking in the mirror
And realising you're Clem
Now in my 40s with a daughter who is fast approaching adolescence, I find myself empathising with Joyce a LOT more.The four ages of Buffy (for a bloke, at least). They can all occur within any given five minute period.
First, you identify with Spike (or Angel, if you're weird), the cool rebel,
Then you ponder for a moment and think, okay, you are (the powerless but ultra-reliable) Xander,
Then you recall something from the seventies and think you're Giles.
Before, finally, looking in the mirror
And realising you're Clem
This. ^^^ Even if you don’t like Buffy, there’s no getting away from the fact it did something very different at the time from a lot of other TV. And I think the comparison to SATC in that respect is fair. Given its apparent feminist (and later LGBTQ+) credentials, it’s a shame that Whedon turned out to be a massive, controlling nob.Because I have taste, muckle flugga. It was also a good time for me to watch TV. mrsb and I rather bonded over, what must have been, the repeats of the series in the run up to the finale in....2004? So, that was nice. Especially as the only other female led drama on at the time, that wasn't completely abysmal shit was Sex and the City*. Comparatively, I think you can see why I have more than a spot spot for Buffy.
I think I have mentioned on The Thread that it was then I first saw the episode The Body. I won't go into detail, but it was only six or nine months after my mum had died and no piece of television ever has made me blub like the Blubbery Baron Of Blub as that did. So it still very much has that time and place effect that hits me as hard as the music I listened to when I was fifteen. That episode is still really hard to watch.
And, it is just really fucking clever in places. Normal Again, Hush, hell, The Zeppo! Heathers is one of my favourite movies too. you can't knock a really good High School drama
*SATC was vilely objectionable and its undoubtedly true mrsb enjoyed it more than me, but it was well made, cannily scripted and had named women talking to other named women about something other than men, still a rarity for the time.
Shame Heartbreak High never gained this traction