Beginning of one section (New York judges, I beg, number your paragraphs like UK court rulings do)
"Defendants offered Robert Unell as a witness in “commercial real estate finance and banking.”"<note 38>
Note 38: Mr. Unell was compensated at a rate of between $900-950 per hour, but he could not recall with any specificity how many hours he had billed, estimating “a couple hundred probably.” TT 5631. Upon cross-examination, Unell stated he had previously worked on engagements for the Trump Organization.
Very end of that section:
"On the whole, the Court was unable to ascribe any reliability to Unell’s “expert” opinions, finding them unresearched, unsupported, inconsistent, and contradicted by ample other documentary and testimonial evidence."