Not all of us have a subscription or have registered with the NYT. However for anyone wondering the NYT termed Trumps remarks 'vulgar' whereas someone on Twitter has observed, correctly imo that they are in fact racist.
I don't subscribe to NYT and am not registered on their site. The link is to the mobile version which appears to be free to view and there are 5 free articles per month.
But, here goes my coffee break . . .
These are the comments in question from Trump. White House has not denied that he said these things.
"Why are we having all these people from shithole countries come here?" Trump said, according to these people, referring to African countries and Haiti. He then suggested that the United States should instead bring more people from countries like Norway, whose prime minister he met yesterday.
Starting with the headline, the NYT uses very soft, minimising terms to describe what he said. Here are more examples of this.
"Trump Alarms Lawmakers With Disparaging Words for Haiti and Africa"
"His (Trump's) penchant for racially tinged remarks,"
"president’s vulgar language on a delicate issue,"
"long-simmering debate over Mr. Trump’s views and talk on race."
"Some people familiar with his comments argued privately on Thursday night that the president had only tried to press that point (immigration based on merit and skills,) using salty language."
"...the vulgar phrase Mr. Trump uttered quickly began trending on Twitter — overshadowing the substance of the DACA talks, and with it, the future of the immigrants at risk of deportation should those discussions fail." (suggesting that the hoo ha folk are making about Trump's comment is what will harm immigrants, not the comments!
)
Also ran the White House deputy Press Secretary's statement deflecting from the comments uncritically and without fact checking.
Disparaging
Vulgar
Talk on race
Racially Charged
Salty
But not racist.