I'm sure it will come out that this firm was given a massive bung to supply this garbage and there's some connection to Trump or some or other Republican in Congress. There's money to be made out of disaster, fleecing the government. There was that energy supply contract a few weeks back.Not exactly...em....fuckin hell.
Just don't know what to say, really.
That FEMA....really prepared for an emergency, eh.
Seen lots of people on social media suggesting military rations would at least have a better nutritional content, but y'know, contracts have been signed, I'm sure.Why dont they have a clearout on military MREs....stuffs got a shelf life afterall ..
I just heard on the radio that Kim called The Donald old as an insult, and he responded by saying how he wouldn't go down to the level of insults, and how he could call Kim short and fat but he won't
Speaking of which . . .Seen lots of people on social media suggesting military rations would at least have a better nutritional content, but y'know, contracts have been signed, I'm sure.
I think it's beyond the Administration and GOP led congress don't care. They genuinely want people on their knees and desperate. Easier to exploit them and the land that way. They've stopped counting casualties from Maria, or at least aren't publicising them.
For their trouble, the six electrical workers from Kissimmee are earning $42 an hour, plus overtime. The senior power linemen from Lakeland are earning $63 an hour working in Puerto Rico, the Florida utility said. Their 40 co-workers from Jacksonville, also linemen, are making up to $100 earning double time, public records show.
But the Montana company that hired the workers, Whitefish Energy Holdings, had a contract that allowed it to bill the Puerto Rican public power company, known as Prepa, $319 an hour for linemen, a rate that industry experts said was far above the norm even for emergency work — and almost 17 times the average salary of their counterparts in Puerto Rico.
A spokesman for Whitefish, Chris Chiames, defended the costs, saying that “simply looking at the rate differential does not take into account Whitefish’s overhead costs,” which were built into the rate.
Would leaving NAFTA be a bad thing in your opinion?
I know I've said "we're fucked" before, but if this is the announcement, and the President is weaponising the judiciary to attack his political opponents on spurious grounds, then the US really is fucked, and so is the world.Actually, looking around some legal tweeting people it seems an investigation into Uranium 1/Clinton Foundation seems possible. . .
Yep, he's learned his reality show stuff well, huh?
Well we don't want to do anything bad for the economy do we.I know it would be BIG, disruptive and popular with his nationalist base - I suspect it would be bad for all three economies in the short term.
Yes, they did. And, the GOP dominated Senate started their shenannigans while Obama was still president. You may recall they refused to even hold hearings for confirmation of the President's nominee, Merrick Garland, to fill the Supreme Court vacancy. They had no justification for the refusal, other than they wanted to appoint "one of their own" and figured they'd have a better chance the longer they waited. How the Hell they got away with this, I don't know, but it should have been an indication of their determination to subvert democracy, by any means necessary.Looking at legal people tweeting I saw a fun little fact. Trump admin has put a lot of people into government posts that need senate confirmation without getting senate confirmation.
On November 18th they will go through a 300-day deadline that will mean they should either stand down until they do get their confirmations or they can carry on technically illegally and thus rendering anything they do subject to legal challenge.
Sessions is testifying before the House Judiciary Committee - apparently does not have Trump's "one of the great memories" when it comes to George Papadopoulos meetings.
Appointing Assange as the Australian ambassador in DC?
Would leaving NAFTA be a bad thing in your opinion?
As opposed to the pain US workers have been feeling for the last 4 decades, with the increase in inequality and the bottom three-fifths of society being worse off in real terms.
Oh those lovely free trade agreements.