andysays
Love and solidarity
an amorphous mass of ordinary well-meaning but fluffy peace-lovers
The bastards
an amorphous mass of ordinary well-meaning but fluffy peace-lovers
The bastards
Turns out it takes more than suggesting war is bad to stop a dictator bent on genocide.
Who would have thought. Obviously all the smart people got killed in the first world war as looking back on the history of the 20 & 30s some really idiotic decisions were made.
yeah andysays YOU LITERALLY LOVE HITLER
Obviously those in power have more to blame depending on why they did it. Which ranged from liking Hitler, to wanting to prepare for the war.Thank you for that profound truth which no one here would have recognised were it not for you
Now, on the subject of Nazi appeasement, do you think the most significant idiotic decisions were taken by a significant sector of the British establishment, who later attempted to cover up their willing appeasement of Hitler, or the amorphous mass of ordinary well-meaning but fluffy peace-lovers represented by the PPU?
Obviously those in power have more to blame depending on why they did it. Which ranged from liking Hitler, to wanting to prepare for the war.
Former case you are either naive or evil. Latter cynically evil.
I don't doubt that the British Legion does good work helping people who need help. But they are also a recruiting sergeant for the army. They are spokespeople for present and future wars and cheerleaders of militarism. No, they won't get my support.
In their campaigning and fund-raising, they dress smiling children in t-shirts saying 'future soldier'. They are not a politically neutral organisation.The RBL are about as much a recruiting sergeant for the army as war poetry is - that is, they're not. What the RBL try to do is pick up the pieces that successive governments have happily left broken.
How's that political?In their campaigning and fund-raising, they dress smiling children in t-shirts saying 'future soldier'. They are not a politically neutral organisation.
Thank you for that profound truth which no one here would have recognised were it not for you
Now, on the subject of Nazi appeasement, do you think the most significant idiotic decisions were taken by a significant sector of the British establishment, who later attempted to cover up their willing appeasement of Hitler, or the amorphous mass of ordinary well-meaning but fluffy peace-lovers represented by the PPU?
How's that political?
Right, so can we please put a stop to this "white poppy wearers are nazi appeasers" shit?
I know you didn't start it, but you appear to be continuing it.
I think that a sector of the British upper class were well into cigarette and blindfold territory. However, from 50 years of observation, the higher up the tree you are (were), the easier it is to engender amnesia in the relevant authorities. Viscount X was a tad misguided, whereas Joe Bloggs was shot as a spy,
How's that political?
Is it, how is promoting the armed forces and helping ex servicemen "political"everything is political. keep up.
I was being slightly sarcastic but seen as you ask,Is it, how is promoting the armed forces and helping ex servicemen "political"
That's like saying a lobby group is political, political is when you pursue a political agenda at some level, IMO.I was being slightly sarcastic but seen as you ask,
with quite a generalised simple explanation.....
Promoting the armed forces........ as has been discussed some people don't agree with conflicts the armed forces are engaged in therefore promoting their part in this can be seen as being political... and being told you are unpatriotic or whatever for not supporting them as, political.
helping ex-servicemen ....... as has been discussed people may prefer the Gov to do it so that discussion is also political...
whether or not the BL are political (which imo they cannot help) the topics you bring up in your comment are very much political
Lobbying is political too: http://www.parliament.uk/get-involved/have-your-say/lobbying/That's like saying a lobby group is political, political is when you pursue a political agenda at some level, IMO.
Not in true sense a lobby group will lobby whoever is in power, politics is the seeking of powerLobbying is political too: http://www.parliament.uk/get-involved/have-your-say/lobbying/
There's not actually much that could be called politics in this view.Not in true sense a lobby group will lobby whoever is in power, politics is the seeking of power
Where did you get that definition of politics from?Not in true sense a lobby group will lobby whoever is in power, politics is the seeking of power
Nowhere, just an opinion,Where did you get that definition of politics from?
I disagree with your opinion, because I think politics is an activity that's not necessarily about seeking power but often about seeking influence on an outcome which may be related to governance but not necessarily.Nowhere, just an opinion,
I disagree with your opinion, because I think politics is an activity that's not necessarily about seeking power but often about seeking influence on an outcome which may be related to governance but not necessarily.
There are politics at local level of course. Lots of community politics of all kinds. There are politics In organisations too, internal politics.Well we could argue that there is a political agenda on the local allotment committee, but generally politics is seen, as the seeking of political power, usually starting at local council level, technically politics is involved wherever there is an elective process, but I prefer to keep it simple,or to generalise, so to speak.