The funding would likely be cut.I think we need to arrive at a definitive answer to OU's perfectly valid enquiries. What if the UK only got x (ie not enough?) amount of medals? WHAT THEN??!!!?!!11?
The funding would likely be cut.I think we need to arrive at a definitive answer to OU's perfectly valid enquiries. What if the UK only got x (ie not enough?) amount of medals? WHAT THEN??!!!?!!11?
Can we pause for a moment to point at Australia and laugh?
yeah, but the Aussies will defo be pointing and laughing at us if we do shitter than them regardless of if we#ve laughed at them now.
shhh... ffs don't let them know that.Yes, but our population is nearly three times as large as theirs
Scotland apparently above Australia in the medal table if you were to calculate it by individual country's results now
I remember when Great Britain got 1 gold medal at Atlanta and our cockiness back then. Hopefully this is a lesson learned.
*points and laughs*
Orang Utan said:What if Team GB gets only thirty-nine medals?
OU
Thread needs updating
I was expecting GB's medal haul to be smaller here than in Beijing tbh. Doesn't look like there's much chance of that.
I know it's a slightly ridiculous stat, but if swimming wasn't part of the Olympics, Britain would actually be well ahead of the US.
For another silly stat, Yorkshire's got more gold medals than Russia.
For another silly stat, Yorkshire's got more gold medals than Russia.
We'll have a parade to celebrate.What if Team GB only get forty medals?
more than oz and japan i heard tooFor another silly stat, Yorkshire's got more gold medals than Russia.