bimble
floofy
No, I know, but the new legislation includes consensual s&m stuff, and people acting, pretending to be in pain etc.
Here's the relevant bit of the legislation mentioned in the article, that the article doesn't mention: "Sections 63 to 67 of the Act make it an offence to possess pornographic images that depict acts which threaten a person's life; acts which result in or are likely to result in serious injury.."
But you never know maybe he really was into animals or corpses.
Still I find it hard to care about what porn he was watching when we know that women on both sides of the house were told repeatedly not to talk about being raped / assaulted by their colleagues.
Here's the relevant bit of the legislation mentioned in the article, that the article doesn't mention: "Sections 63 to 67 of the Act make it an offence to possess pornographic images that depict acts which threaten a person's life; acts which result in or are likely to result in serious injury.."
But you never know maybe he really was into animals or corpses.
Still I find it hard to care about what porn he was watching when we know that women on both sides of the house were told repeatedly not to talk about being raped / assaulted by their colleagues.
Last edited: