ElectricKingdom
New Member
[you needed an i there]
Don't you mean an I?
Don't you mean an I?
[you needed an i there]
Don't you mean an I?
good stuff....
How can the vllage idiot get online so easily these days? ...its them community carers. Bleeding heart liberals
[you needed an i there]
Don't you mean an I?
but with that buster and suspenders it's ... well kinda distracting, if you didn't want people to stare you shouldn't have drawn attention to yourself... reallyStop fantasizing about us.
I agree with you about this.
Got any ideas? Last time this happened (police penning in protestors) , it went to court and court ruled on the side of the protestors. Now we see the police using same tactic again, in full knowledge of the outcome (they get to be brutal at a sitting-target they won't allow to leave). Actually, that's not policing.
No one was really penned in - it was possible to get in and out and around, but several main points were blocked (with horses and dogs on one road). If you really wanted out you could get out.
-i found it to be a bit of a bizzare day - very quiet - almost a silent vigil at times. Almost no chanting, no speakers (impromptu or otherwise), very little music etc. To be honest I think it was good that it was riot-free today. Choose your battles and all that. DIdnt feel like the time or the place. Still, this is but the beginning of this financial meltdown... a long road ahead. Im sure many more actions lie ahead.
The Climate Camp was, and is, a great success - very peaceful and pleasant atmosphere - and succesfully got their tents down and set up. Will be interesting to see if they last the night as they plan to. I expect a late night eviction by force to take place.
*still a small chance of little groups pulling off some stunts here and there i guess...
Police officer tells protester he will have to urinate in the street as exits blocked. #imcg20 seems so?
+To be honest I think it was good that it was riot-free today. Choose your battles and all that. DIdnt feel like the time or the place. Still, this is but the beginning of this financial meltdown... a long road ahead. Im sure many more actions lie ahead.
I think this is why it was good that it has gone off peacefuly (so far) - it did expose the police as heavy handed.The Guardian take on it.
'Riot police or rioting Police'
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2009/apr/01/g20-policing-climate-protest-riot
David Coulthard?
A smashed window is hardly "radical". More go-with flow, smash something because we can, etc...
@chrisluff on twitter said:Just been watching the G20 riots all the Liberals shouting WHAT DO WE WANT? gradual change WHEN DO WE WANT IT? in due course
he could string three word together and had a point of why he was there. Not like another protester interviewed who couldn't ancer the question Why are you here todayprotestor man did well enough on 4pm news
he could string three word together and had a point of why he was there. Not like another protester interviewed who couldn't ancer the question Why are you here today
Maybe by the same kind of person who is proud of getting an ASBO before any of their mates and will add that photo to the family album to show to their kids? After all what's the typical sentence for criminal damage to a window these days?I was thinking that. I'd be a bit dubious about smashing a window with dozens of cameras pointed at me, and without my face covered.
Any news on this Alternative Summit? Website hasn't been updated since yesterday.
Put back til 6pm. Building was shut by the authorities.
Maybe by the same kind of person who is proud of getting an ASBO before any of their mates and will add that photo to the family album to show to their kids? After all what's the typical sentence for criminal damage to a window these days?
You're making a lot of assumptions here, and likewise I probably am too. So that said, neither of us know for sure what motivated the individual, or individuals, to smash the windows. However, in the event that they were smashed because of the outrageous salaries paid to bankers, when vast numbers of people are being made unemployed and losing their homes on a daily basis, would you then, in theory, consider the behaviour to be one of radical dissent?
If he was trying to show off why would he cover his face?Possibly. Except you tend to get ASBO's for repeated anti-social behaviour, whereas this is a single act of political dissent. Which is maybe more worthy of being proud of.
He still should've covered his face though.