Another scumbag bites the dust. More slaughter within the loyalist family presumably.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4573194.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4573194.stm
tollbar said:Another scumbag bites the dust. More slaughter within the loyalist family presumably.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/scotland/4573194.stm
smash_g8 said:would your remarks also cover Republican gangsters who murdered more women and children than loyalists? Let's say, the murderers of Robert McCartney, an innocent civilian. Or, are you selective in your
hatred
tollbar said:Your Orange slip is showing. how do you detect from the fact that I regard the demise of a member of the LVF drug gang operating in a city already swamped by narcotics of one sort or another as an indication that I might support the killing of Macartney ?. For 30 years I supported the struggle against British imperialism in Ireland. While rejecting armed struggle in the current period I will give no support to operations by PIRA or similar designed to maintain a hold over working class communities on behalf of maintaining a sectarian status quo which in the end only benefits the imperialism such organisations were set up to fight.
I was under the impression that in the latter part of the troubles, far more catholics were being murdered by the loyalists than the other way around.smash_g8 said:... who murdered more women and children than loyalists ...
smash_g8 said:As to how far your support went for the murder of women and children over the past 30 years. Do you not consider women and children as part of the working class? Or were this innocent casualities all to forgotten about in the name of an 'alleged' struggle againt something
In my mind, Leslie Robb = Scum
Loyalist terrorists and their supporters = scum
Republican terrorists and supporters = Scum
Divisive Cotton said:Do you write for the Sun by any chance?
tollbar said:Your Orange slip is showing. how do you detect from the fact that I regard the demise of a member of the LVF drug gang operating in a city already swamped by narcotics of one sort or another as an indication that I might support the killing of Macartney ?
smash_g8 said:I have a clear conscience that no one innocent was murdered on my behalf, you obviousely cannot feel the same
DexterTCN said:So...the 'frenzied attack' bit is a bit unusual though, innit?
Drug dealers are usually more professional.
tollbar said:I wouldnt dignify his posts with a further reply.
According to that mighty organ, The Daily Record. Robb was stabbed by someone that he knew, allegedly a low level drug user because Robb wouldnt take the bloke to his dealer. seemingly Robb knew his killer, of course, other reasons (the sort that Larry points out) cannot be ruled out, but its more then likely that his business activities were getting up the wrong noses, not an unusual cause of death in that part of the world.
Robb, of course didnt get the chance of a cushy acedemic career as did his former comrade in arms David Seawright as Stirling Uni, unlike Strathclyde, were not keen on having people with UVF pedigrees about the place.
how on earth do you reach that conclusion from his original post?!tollbar said:Your Orange slip is showing.
shame on you for dirtying these boardstollbar said:According to that mighty organ, The Daily Record...
Red Faction said:how on earth do you reach that conclusion from his original post?!
smash_g8 said:that is what brought the IRA to the peace table, they certainly were not 'protecting' their community.
fanta said:Armed struggle - that was the period of ultimately pointless violence where neighbours murdered each other even though they were only families apart, right?!
tollbar said:Too much wine on my part probably. I think he was trying to be over emotive not to mention sexist if he was trying to paint women as defenceless victims during the period of the armed struggle. I suspect that most of us here can think of women from all sides who were very active participants, from undercover brits through the likes of Gina Adair toting her Kalasnikov to IRA and INLA volunteers.
Isambard said:What brought the British state to the negotiating table?
The realisation that they weren't going to "win" in their objectives either.
Isambard said:What brought the British state to the negotiating table?
The realisation that they weren't going to "win" in their objectives either.
foggypane said:The British could hardly lose. Republican terrorist groups had zero chance of a military victory over the British state, ever.
True enough Isambard but one cynical way of looking at the huge British Military presence in Ulster during the 70's, 80's and 90's is that it was being used as a very effective training ground for conflicts elsewhere in the world. That type of training is invaluable and look how many times we heard it mentioned in the early days of 'peace keeping' in Basra.Isambard said:Quite possibly. But the British state wasn't on the verge of victory either despite the resourses at its disposal.
John Major let the cat out of the bag when he said there was no "selfish interest" in Northern Ireland: Not only did the British state realise it wasn't going to win militarily, the state / capital realised or finally admitted to itself that it no longer had any reason to hold onto Northern Ireland: Western ports, shipbuilding and textiles simply aren't "worth" as much as they were in the early 20th Century.
At the same time the Republic was booming and the Dublin crooks could sell the idea in the 26 counties that making money (mostly for themselves) was more important than any notion of what the Easter Rising might have been about.
And of course, middle to ruling class nationalists (including some IRA men ) in Northern Ireland has their eye on the spoils that might come from some peace / devolution deal.
The idea that it all happened just becuase the IRA relaise they couldn't win militarily is not true.