It's not about the violence or lack thereof, it's about the impact on important UK infrastructure, the potential of struggles generalising and catalysing or being part of a wider movement for social change, or the threat to public order. (With broadly the security services being more bothered about the first and second issues, and the police being more concerned with the public order issue.)
All the bleating that we're not terrorist or worthy of monitoring is missing the point entirely.
Met brief said a “witch-hunt” of officers would deter future covert sources and recruits.
I thought the former Social Worker Party had a patent on calling everything inconvenient a “witch-hunt” ?
don't talk shit. i think 'vital national infrastructure' in the shape of nuclear power stations should be shut down and millions of people agree with me. but you seem to be saying in the 80s the police should have infiltrated the tory partyIf the organisation the met infiltrated have the goal of shutting vital uk infrastructure down then yes the met should infiltrate it whatever cause they are doing it for. Those are illegal acts and the police have a duty to stop them.
Honestly couldn't have hurt.don't talk shit. i think 'vital national infrastructure' in the shape of nuclear power stations should be shut down and millions of people agree with me. but you seem to be saying in the 80s the police should have infiltrated the tory party
oddly though, the only organisation that actually did come relatively close to shutting down a significant part of the UK national infrastructure in this period wasn't infiltrated, kettled etc and the government rapidly capitulated to their demands.If the organisation the met infiltrated have the goal of shutting vital uk infrastructure down then yes the met should infiltrate it whatever cause they are doing it for. Those are illegal acts and the police have a duty to stop them.
those behind the fuel tax protest movement that blockaded fuel depots and refineries, ending up with the government ending the fuel tax escalator.
oddly though, the only organisation that actually did come relatively close to shutting down a significant part of the UK national infrastructure in this period wasn't infiltrated, kettled etc and the government rapidly capitulated to their demands.
That organisation being those behind the fuel tax protest movement that blockaded fuel depots and refineries, ending up with the government ending the fuel tax escalator.
So environmental protestors get infiltrated, have thousands of police sent against them, whereas anti-environmental protestors get left to nearly bring the country to a halt so that the government can have an excuse to scrap an environmental measure.
This is politically motivated policing.
I'm sure they'll find Bob Lambert didn't do it (I see it is also covered in another thread)
Scotland Yard is reinvestigating a 1987 firebomb attack after it was linked to allegations about a disbanded undercover police unit. In a statement, the Metropolitan Police said it was pursuing lines of inquiry linked to the incident at a Debenhams department store in north London. It said new evidence had emerged during a review of undercover operations.
I'm sure they'll find Bob Lambert didn't do it (I see it is also covered in another thread)
I was kind of taking the piss when I said "'I'm sure they'll find Bob Lambert didn't do it" The police almost always protect their own.Undercover work means you may have to commit a crime to maintain your cover. The animal rights lot deserved to be infiltrated if Bob didn't do it one of the others would and Bob might have been kicked out. Now if Bob decided to encourage the others to bomb debenhams built the bomb himself etc yes the met have to come up with some answers.
I was kind of taking the piss when I said "'I'm sure they'll find Bob Lambert didn't do it" The police almost always protect their own.
As to your point above "Undercover work means you may have to commit a crime to maintain your cover" I think you are wrong, the police do not have any right to commit crime, they are there to uphold the law. Any undercover police officer will fully understand that at some point in the future they may well be called as a witness in a court-case, if it can be proved that they themselves committed crimes they would have little or no credibility as a witness and their evidence would be tainted. That is why if you are ever going to commit a crime with someone you are not 100% sure of, you should make them do some illegal before you act with them.
Lawrence said: “In my view, because of what the undercover police officers did, they don’t deserve this special treatment. I didn’t do anything to be spied upon.
“They chose to spy upon me. And they have been caught out. They now have to deal with the consequences of what they did.”
Not all the left wing groups spied on were non violent. This does not excuse in any way the relationships but the animal rights movement was not 100% non violent in the 1980s.
So what?Not all the left wing groups spied on were non violent. This does not excuse in any way the relationships but the animal rights movement was not 100% non violent in the 1980s.
They spy on us because they recognise our power, and fear it this fucking wanker
"
he report also mentions the huge trust placed in a secret central group at Climate Camp who worked on the small number of issues that couldn’t be publicised. This something still very much in evidence, replicated in Climate Camp’s successor, Reclaim the Power, but with a new democratising twist that makes it extremely difficult for the police to get advance warning of actions.
The process is called “activist speed dating” – people fill in forms about their abilities and preferences, then they are matched up in a group with others of a similar level. Each group is given a relevant target but have autonomy about what the action will be. It’s a conscious, creative response that balances openness with effectiveness."
tosser
7. On June 7.Solidarity picket demanding police disclose evidence
solidarity picket at 11am on june. - its very good, the continuing conflation of all spying on activists/people as #spycops - good hashtag - (even when its the spooks doing the naughty stuff) - particularly as this falls on the same day the #snooperscharter debated in parliment. (charter thsat will give police spook powers to snoop on computers and importantly, use as evicence as opposed to intelligence) -
more power to their elbow i say viva la revolution