teqniq
DisMembered
I had to smile at the headline in the Graun. What, now you fear after all the meddling and interference? Really?
EU fears fallout of Ukraine crisis
EU fears fallout of Ukraine crisis
Yep they were only allowed to even start coming back in the 80s
Those of my comments concerning the maligning of Ukrainians who identify as Jews or who are treated as Jews were made solely because of what was happening & what the effects may be. This might have had an effect on Palestine, & sure enough it has (the links posted by others - not me). In some of my comments on Ukraine I have indeed spoken to this, as is relevant for this thread.your statements about Israel etc have [. . .]
"Judaic-Israeli supremacism": all ruling is a supremacy. Since classes arose it has necessarily been classed (feudal, capitalist), it has been gendered (patriarchal, matriarchal), & sometimes coloured, ethnicised, or religioised-ethnicised (white supremacy, Afrikaans supremacy, Judaic-Israeli supremacy). All very accurate, all very warranted.the way you write [. . .]
I had to smile at the headline in the Graun. What, now you fear after all the meddling and interference? Really?
EU fears fallout of Ukraine crisis
Pro-goverment supporters forced to pray at shrines for dead fascists:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/loyalists-ousted-ukraine-president-forced-3178075
Aye, and I can't imagine their chances are good.If its silent prayers I suspect those chaps are praying for themselves though.
.
.
.
.
.
All this is in parentheses as it refers to something earlier in the day. There is no rational reason for a continuation.
Those of my comments concerning the maligning of Ukrainians who identify as Jews or who are treated as Jews were made solely because of what was happening & what the effects may be. This might have had an effect on Palestine, & sure enough it has (the links posted by others - not me). In some of my comments on Ukraine I have indeed spoken to this, as is relevant for this thread.
You say, "I do find it a bit annoying that there's always someone who immediately starts up about Israel and Palestine", but that does not apply to my comments here, as the record shows. It's not me who's combing the world's news media for such items; my focus & interest has been on the broad processes at work.
'Judaic', rather than its quasi-synonym 'Jewish', is to emphasise two things. (1), the group in Ukraine (& elsewhere) that we are talking about has as a necessary constituent, a necessary involvement with, a religion, Judaism. As Akiva Orr has pointed out, Judaism is unlike Christianity & Islam in that it is not, & does not aspire to be, a universal religion, one of & for humanity as a whole. It therefore makes Judaism a necessary aspect of creating & re-creating a distinct group of individuals described as being Jews. This is as true in Ukraine as it is elsewhere. (2), most of the proponents of the nationalism called Zionism have been atheists or agnostics, & some of them have repeatedly tried to devise an ideology & practice independent of religiosity, & have always failed - not least coz of the necessity just identified.
"Judaic-Israeli supremacism": all ruling is a supremacy. Since classes arose it has necessarily been classed (feudal, capitalist), it has been gendered (patriarchal, matriarchal), & sometimes coloured, ethnicised, or religioised-ethnicised (white supremacy, Afrikaans supremacy, Judaic-Israeli supremacy). All very accurate, all very warranted.
"Khazar theory" wasn't mentioned by me. However, as you know, historiography & historical inquiry is something rational people engage with.
As far as the authors & org'n you mentioned, I have never read them. But Stormfront is a fascist org'n, which is the opposite of my politics.
.
.
.
.
.
All this is in parentheses as it refers to something earlier in the day. There is no rational reason for a continuation.
Those of my comments concerning the maligning of Ukrainians who identify as Jews or who are treated as Jews were made solely because of what was happening & what the effects may be. This might have had an effect on Palestine, & sure enough it has (the links posted by others - not me). In some of my comments on Ukraine I have indeed spoken to this, as is relevant for this thread.
You say, "I do find it a bit annoying that there's always someone who immediately starts up about Israel and Palestine", but that does not apply to my comments here, as the record shows. It's not me who's combing the world's news media for such items; my focus & interest has been on the broad processes at work.
'Judaic', rather than its quasi-synonym 'Jewish', is to emphasise two things. (1), the group in Ukraine (& elsewhere) that we are talking about has as a necessary constituent, a necessary involvement with, a religion, Judaism. As Akiva Orr has pointed out, Judaism is unlike Christianity & Islam in that it is not, & does not aspire to be, a universal religion, one of & for humanity as a whole. It therefore makes Judaism a necessary aspect of creating & re-creating a distinct group of individuals described as being Jews. This is as true in Ukraine as it is elsewhere. (2), most of the proponents of the nationalism called Zionism have been atheists or agnostics, & some of them have repeatedly tried to devise an ideology & practice independent of religiosity, & have always failed - not least coz of the necessity just identified.
"Judaic-Israeli supremacism": all ruling is a supremacy. Since classes arose it has necessarily been classed (feudal, capitalist), it has been gendered (patriarchal, matriarchal), & sometimes coloured, ethnicised, or religioised-ethnicised (white supremacy, Afrikaans supremacy, Judaic-Israeli supremacy). All very accurate, all very warranted.
"Khazar theory" wasn't mentioned by me. However, as you know, historiography & historical inquiry is something rational people engage with.
As far as the authors & org'n you mentioned, I have never read them. But Stormfront is a fascist org'n, which is the opposite of my politics.
From The Mirror, the 'glam shots begin, though there doesn't seem to have been many as mostly middle aged fat blokes on the Maidan,
is that a far right bandana?
It seems from that article that the EU and America are looking to work together to raise money for Ukraine. Now that means the country is in real trouble - they might get an IMF loan!I had to smile at the headline in the Graun. What, now you fear after all the meddling and interference? Really?
EU fears fallout of Ukraine crisis
From The Mirror, the 'glam' shots begin, though there doesn't seem to have been many as mostly middle aged fat blokes on the Maidan,
is that a far right bandana?
But still, this divide does exist, and by the way it was the main reason why in Ukraine the ruling class failed to establish an authoritarian regime in the mould of Russia or Belarus: it ensured that no politician has ever had support from the majority of the population. Therefore, they had to balance and make concessions to the weak working class: bourgeois democracy was retained, and welfare state elements are much more generous than in Russia.
Aye, and I can't imagine their chances are good.
I fear that poor Mr Yanukovych will serve a little longer than that if they catch him.
Pro-goverment supporters forced to pray at shrines for dead fascists:
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/loyalists-ousted-ukraine-president-forced-3178075
Russia has now recalled its ambassador to Ukraine...for consultations . Unsure whether thats ominous or not . .
In other Mirror news: 31 stone virgin put girlfriend in HOSPITAL while having sex for the first time.
Have you seen the video reconstruction on that article? Bizarre.In other Mirror news: 31 stone virgin put girlfriend in HOSPITAL while having sex for the first time.
Its a good stance but it backfired as you made me clickNo. I don't want to encourage bullshit news stories by clicking on the links.