butchersapron
Bring back hanging
We've had a good look at the far-right component of the euromaiden. Here's a few things looking at the far-right/fascist/eurasian motivations of those looking to defend Russia's role and actions here - see how easily they mesh with the posts from the resident russian state fetishist on here? (Btw the author Anton Shekhovtsov, seems to have moved from a panicked you in the west need to be aware of the hard core fasicts behind a lot of this around the turn of the year to a more nunanced there are competing groups but the dominant tone is not fascist it is simply anti govt)
The European extreme right and Russian imperialism
Pro-Russian network behind the anti-Ukrainian defamation campaign
Note Dugin with fingers in all the pies.
"Re-organisation of the Ukrainian space", or Putin's agents in Ukraine
The European extreme right and Russian imperialism
Thus, the European far right's calls for the EU's non-intereference in the "Ukrainian question" should be seen as the calls for the EU's sell-out of Ukraine to Putin's imperialist project. But Putin has his extreme right accomplices in Ukraine itself too. Russia is funding pro-Russian far right organisations in the Crimea and Sevastopol (Le Pen, by the way, visited Sevastopol last summer), while Ukrainian extreme right agent provocateur Dmytro Korchyns'ky was one of the people behind the controversial attacks on the presidential administration in Kyiv during the Euromaidan protests. And "by sheer chance", Korchyns'ky was a member of the Highest Council of Dugin's International Eurasian Movement...
Mölzer's and Le Pen's calls for the non-intereference in the "Ukrainian sovereignty" are only a tip of the iceberg of the collaboration between Russian imperialists and the European far right. The "Ukrainian question" may not be the most important aspect of this bigger picture, but if the EU loses Ukraine, it will be implicated in making the European extreme right even stronger.
Pro-Russian network behind the anti-Ukrainian defamation campaign
The Canada-based Centre for Research on Globalization is also interesting. It was founded and is now headed by Michel Chossudovsky; among the Centre's contributors are Neil Clark, Mahdi D. Nazemroaya and William Engdahl. Chossudovsky, Nazemroaya and Engdahl are members of the scientific committee of the Italian journal Geopolitica, which also includes John Laughland and Natalya Narochnitskaya. Geopolitica is edited by Tiberio Graziani, a fervent advocate of the Eurasian cooperation and a member of the High Council of the International Eurasian Movement led by Russian fascist Aleksandr Dugin. In 2008, Dugin called for the Russian occupation of Georgia, and even made a trip to South Ossetia together with his followers from the Eurasian Youth Union.
Geopolitica itself is an off-shoot from the Italian extreme right journal Eurasia, Rivista di Studi Geopolitici, published and edited by Italian Nazi-Maoist Claudio Mutti. The scientific board of Eurasia includes Aleksandr Dugin and William Engdahl. In the early January, Engdahl published a piece titled "The Belgrade US-Financed Training Group Behind the Carefully-Orchestrated Kiev Protests".
Note Dugin with fingers in all the pies.
"Re-organisation of the Ukrainian space", or Putin's agents in Ukraine
Why would Russian authorities be interested in the division of Ukraine if they want to incorporate it in its Eurasian Union? Russian fascist Aleksandr Dugin (whom I already mentioned earlier and will refer to again) believes that Ukraine is too diverse to be incorporated in its entirety in the Russian geopolitical project. In his Foundations of Geopolitics, where he describes the Russia-led Eurasian integration, Dugin writes:
The sovereignty of Ukraine represents such a negative phenomenon for Russian geopolitics that it can, in principle, easily provoke a military conflict. [...] Ukraine as an independent state with some territorial ambitions constitutes an enormous threat to the whole Eurasia, and without the solution of the Ukrainian problem, it is meaningless to talk about the contitental geopolitics. [...] Considering the fact that a simple intergration of Moscow with Kyiv is impossible and will not result in a stable geopolitical structure [...], Moscow should get actively involved in the re-organisation of the Ukrainian space in accordance to the only logical and natural geopolitical model.
...
Provocations by the Presidential Administration and calls for the division of Ukraine are two sides of the same bad coin: the activities of Korchyns'ky, Romanenko, Zbitnev, and other right-wing extremists are inciting hatred, divisions, and fomenting civil war in Ukraine, and are eventually implementing the geopolitical strategy of Russian fascist imperialists.