Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

Ukraine

14 sotnya at the top means '14th company'.

ffs, theres a caption under the picture itself that spells out: "Anti-government protestors of the "14 Hundred Self-Defense" group take part in a protest rally in front of the Prosecutor General building in Kiev on February 14, 2014. (Yury Kirnichny/AFP)"

maybe you can help to translate the bottom bit, the bit no ones worked out yet..
 
ffs, theres a caption under the picture itself that spells out: "Anti-government protestors of the "14 Hundred Self-Defense" group take part in a protest rally in front of the Prosecutor General building in Kiev on February 14, 2014. (Yury Kirnichny/AFP)"

maybe you can help to translate the bottom bit, the bit no ones worked out yet..
I didn't see the caption.(And there wasn't one on the image I saw anyway.)

ffs back at you, tosser.
 
...theres a caption under the picture itself that spells out: "Anti-government protestors of the "14 Hundred Self-Defense" group take part in a protest rally in front of the Prosecutor General building in Kiev on February 14, 2014. (Yury Kirnichny/AFP)"...

Whatever the exact significance of the words "14 Hundred Self-Defence" and the meaning of the as-yet-untranslated words at the bottom, it's pretty obvious from this and other pictures that this is not simply a spontaneous bunch of protestors, but that some of them are well organised and equipped and have the look of paramilitaries.

Wonder how long the western media can continue to avoid noticing or commenting on this aspect
 
Whatever the exact significance of the words "14 Hundred Self-Defence" and the meaning of the as-yet-untranslated words at the bottom, it's pretty obvious from this and other pictures that this is not simply a spontaneous bunch of protestors, but that some of them are well organised and equipped and have the look of paramilitaries.

Wonder how long the western media can continue to avoid noticing or commenting on this aspect

If they can ignore others wafting about in full SS regalia Id say pretty much indefinitely.
 
maybe you can help to translate the bottom bit, the bit no ones worked out yet..


QkV4oz7.jpg



Vilni Lyudi = Free People

http://www.cybermova.com/online/ (two-way dictionary with a pop-up Ukrainian keyboard)

There is no 'v' in the Ukrainian alphabet (the Uk. letter 'B' is pronounced /vur/, as an English 'v'), so its usage is presumably purely symbolic, maybe as a decisive mark, firm, down then up, like a symmetrical Nike ssssssswishhhhhhhhhh.

Added: point is they're organised, determined, proved their metal, earnt credibility, earnt respect, garnered support. In other words they're growing, flourishing.

It means Shekhovtsov may want to revise his Guardian-rejected assessment, made on 10 Feb, in which he says both "the far right and the far left" are claiming that "the Euromaidan protests are taken over by the Ukrainian extreme right; therefore the West should not support Euromaidan." He continues,

"the protests in Ukraine, which are driven by aspirations for freedom, dignity and democracy . . .

"The Euromaidan protests are essentially pro-democratic, pro-European and multicultural. The Ukrainian far right is only a minor element of these protests, and these groups are very far from exerting any ideological influence on Euromaidan.

"Those who associate Euromaidan with right-wing extremism or overemphasize its role in the pro-European protests have neither understanding of the Ukrainian politics and history nor expertise in the studies of the Ukrainian far right. Sadly, however, their alarmist reports and commentaries legitimize brutal repressions against protesters and work in favour of the westward expansion of authoritarianism."
http://anton-shekhovtsov.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/the-ukrainian-protests-are-about.html (my emphases)
 
Last edited:
Some have asked to what extent these nationalists, perhaps fascists, are organising within the Square. Well, yesterday gawkrodger kindly posted a link to an interview with Ukrainian anti-fa by Tim Eastman (unfortunately undated but posted Wednesday, 19Feb):

"There are lots of Nationalists here, including Nazis. They came from all over Ukraine, and they make up about 30% of protesters."

"There’s a lot of infighting between Pravy [Right Sector] and Svoboda. They worked together during the violence but now everything is calm so there’s time to focus on each other."

"One of the worst things is that Pravy has this official structure. They are coordinated. You need passes to go certain places. They have the power to give or not give people permission to be active. We’re trying to be active but we have to avoid Nazis"

"A group of 100 anarchists tried to arrange their own self-defense group, different Anarchist groups came together for a meeting on the Maidan. While they were meeting a group of Nazis came in a larger group, they had axes and baseball bats and sticks, helmets, they said it was their territory. They called the Anarchists things like Jews, blacks, Communists. There weren’t even any Communists, that was just an insult. The Anarchists weren’t expecting this and they left. People with other political views can’t stay in certain places, they aren’t tolerated."

"Early on a Stalinist tent was attacked by Nazis. One was sent to the hospital. Another student spoke out against fascism and he was attacked.
Pravy Sektor got too much attention after the first violence, the media gave them popularity and they started to think they’re cool guys. Pravy existed before but now it’s growing and attracting a lot of new people [. . .]
After this Pravy will have more young guys. They have money to make propaganda, uniforms, they’re getting more attention and they look cool [. . .]
The Ukraine is a patriarchal country so to be a strong man who’s fighting is a good aim." So kool it is.

"Nazi groups are also trying to mimic leftists, to try to ingratiate themselves. They use anarchist vocabulary, words like 'autonomous.' One group of the ugliest Nazis is now doing this by calling themselves 'Autonomous Resistance.' They’ve had lots of success with this tactic.
They attract some Anarchists who think they’re changing the Nazis, but really the Nazis are changing them. They’re becoming more nationalistic, they have more more anti-feminist views, etc. Now is when Anarchists need to speak out and be louder." Anarchos on the change.

"The fascist groups don’t have common aims, they know what they’re opposed to, and that they’re opposed to each other, but they don’t all want the same things. If Pravy has positions in a new government that would be really dangerous but that isn’t possible, they aren’t powerful enough."

"People have these chants: 'Glory Ukraine,' 'Glory to Heroes.' 'Death to Enemies.' But who are these heroes, who are these enemies? I don’t think they have any idea. 'Ukraine Above All' is one, just like they used to chant in Germany."

"These nationalists are here not for rights but for nation and it’s practical for leaders to encourage this, because a focus on nationalism lets them do whatever they want. It’s mostly working class and poor people at EuroMaidan, and their attention needs to be diverted to real problems. Lots of people want to manipulate the people here."

http://www.timothyeastman.com/uncat...rei-and-sascha-of-antifascist-action-ukraine/
 
Does anyone know of a good piece giving a rundown on current far-right symbols? Most of us on here know what the Celtic cross has been repurposed for, and that a wolf's hook is not something an angler might use. But more people probably don't know this stuff.
 
On the battle within the euromaidan:

Just last night, the unexpectedly sold-out presentation by the journal "Commons" ("Спильнэ") [1]in the "Ukrainian House" - then still occupied by the protesters - seemed like a great success. For the first time, an event organized by the radical left was attended by such a large crowd of ordinary and "undamaged" by critical theory people. Even more importantly, our radical left slogans received an enthusiastic response. As it often occurs during times of revolution, the people were even more radical than the revolutionaries. Thus, when speaking of social impoverishment, we called for limits on bourgeois rights - a law preventing oligarchs and millionaires from serving in government positions, and banning them from running for elections on all levels. The audience responded with its own counter-proposal: strip the oligarchs and millionaires of all political rights.

Taras Salamanyuk, in his article on the "Спильнэ" site, has perhaps accurately expressed the general feeling of weakness and helplessness among leftist organizations: "We have neither organizations capable of executing planned strategic activities, nor media resources enabling us to reach a wide audience, nor enough analytical potential to competently analyze our own actions." However, beyond the helplessness of the Ukrainian radical left, what I find particularly depressing is the general weakness in the organization of the Maidan in general.

The eyewitness report also has some interesting things about the non-appearance of nazi self-defence groups and who was actually doing the fighting (hipsters apparently)

On the latter see also:

Collective statement by experts on Ukrainian nationalism on the role of far right groups in Ukraine’s protest movement, and a warning about the Russian imperialism-serving effects of some supposedly anti-fascist media reports from Kyiv

While we are critical of far right activities on the EuroMaidan, we are, nevertheless, disturbed by a dangerous tendency in too many international media reports dealing with the recent events in Ukraine. An increasing number of lay assessments of the Ukrainian protest movement, to one degree or another, misrepresents the role, salience and impact of Ukraine’s far right within the protest movement. Numerous reports allege that the pro-European movement is being infiltrated, driven or taken over by radically ethnocentrist groups of the lunatic fringe. Some presentations create the misleading impression that ultra-nationalist actors and ideas are at the core or helm of the Ukrainian protests. Graphic pictures, juicy quotes, sweeping comparisons and dark historical references are in high demand. They are combined with a disproportionate consideration of one particularly visible, yet politically minor segment within the confusing mosaic that is formed by the hundreds of thousands of protesters with their different motivations, backgrounds and aims.

It goes on to firmly take sides with the protesters and against Russia and says the concentration on the far-right/ethnonationalists is largely being pushed from that direction for obvious reasons. So whilst the signatories try to make a point about their expertise and implied objectivity, this is a political intervention. Which leaves them open to counter-attack.

But this sort of thing has appeared a lot since the real violence kicked off. I don't know whether it's because the far-right has lost influence (i can't see that), whether its those who were on the fence but were pushed by the recent events into open support seeking to play down the nastier side now that that they're involved, whether more info has come out or whether the euromaidan intellectuals have just lately come to realise what damage was being done by images of hard core nazis in mass numbers.

I hate to go back to this stuff again, but, well, it's there. It's relevant.
 
We are also going to see part 2 of answers to the question 'Do the active protesters actually listen to the opposition leaders?' The answer yesterday morning seemed to be no, as the truce unravelled as soon as it began, but this aspect was largely buried as the days events unfolded. With a new deal today but comments such as the following, this stuff will be tested further.

16:00:
Not all opposition protest groups in Ukraine support the deal. The radical right-wing group Right Sector, has denounced the agreement in a tweet, saying: "The opposition is planning to form a coalition with murderers, so now everyone will have to decide for themselves what to do next." - via BBC Monitoring

(via the BBC live page)
 
On the battle within the euromaidan:





The eyewitness report also has some interesting things about the non-appearance of nazi self-defence groups and who was actually doing the fighting (hipsters apparently)

On the latter see also:

Collective statement by experts on Ukrainian nationalism on the role of far right groups in Ukraine’s protest movement, and a warning about the Russian imperialism-serving effects of some supposedly anti-fascist media reports from Kyiv



It goes on to firmly take sides with the protesters and against Russia and says the concentration on the far-right/ethnonationalists is largely being pushed from that direction for obvious reasons. So whilst the signatories try to make a point about their expertise and implied objectivity, this is a political intervention. Which leaves them open to counter-attack.

But this sort of thing has appeared a lot since the real violence kicked off. I don't know whether it's because the far-right has lost influence (i can't see that), whether its those who were on the fence but were pushed by the recent events into open support seeking to play down the nastier side now that that they're involved, whether more info has come out or whether the euromaidan intellectuals have just lately come to realise what damage was being done by images of hard core nazis in mass numbers.

I hate to go back to this stuff again, but, well, it's there. It's relevant.

The people writing this are doing so primarily to convince themselves, I think.

"Keep telling yourself, everything will be OK, everything will be OK".
 
If the violence continues after the signing of this agreement, can we conclude that it was in fact the far-right who were on the front line of the fighting?
 
If the violence continues after the signing of this agreement, can we conclude that it was in fact the far-right who were on the front line of the fighting?

Not conclusively I don't think - but it will show that the 'moderate' leaders weren't in any kind of control. Which I guess most people knew already.
 
The new agreement signed by the Prez & the 3 opposition leaders (incl. the Svoboda guy) he had met earlier in the week with the purpose of . . . making an agreement:
http://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/cae/...licationFile/190027/140221-UKR_Erklaerung.pdf

It's signed by 4 witnesses, G4, that's Foreign Ministers of Fra., Ger., & Pol., & "special envoy" (don't want to get too close) of Russia.

Added: presumably this agreement has no legal effect. If it's acted on a challenge in the court would be successful. The current constitution presumably has a way of changing . . . the constitution, & that doesn't include arming a thousand of your mates, doing an Occupy to create a focus, doing a Public Enemy to show you're serious, then threatening worse. But UK law has 'the public interest' reason so maybe Ukrainian law has it too.
 
Last edited:
Not conclusively I don't think - but it will show that the 'moderate' leaders weren't in any kind of control. Which I guess most people knew already.

Media response to this stuff interests me. In arab spring revolutions the media were often prepared to briefly and excitedly point the 'leaderless' aspect out, but mostly failed to explore the implications of that in any depth (surprise surprise). With events in Ukraine its been more of a mix, some aspects of arab spring style reporting featuring heavily, but only in certain dimensions, and the old-school 'usual solutions involving official opposition leaders' stuff has grabbed attention in recent days. I am not predicting that opposition figureheads will prove to be quite as irrelevant in Ukraine as they were in many arab spring countries, but I wait with interest to see what the balance turns out to be.
 
apparently a video of the right sector with (quoting off a friend's FB)

'nd so...the Nightmare continues. This is a clip with the Right Sector, with kalashnikovs (the day after the weapons raids in Lviv) screaming about killing their opponents and "If they will no quit this land we will kill them. Ukraine above all!".'

 
Back
Top Bottom