Casually Red
tomorrow belongs to me
Oh god. When arguing against stupidity, it is necessary to spell every-thing out in words of one syl-lab-ble.
If Ukraine isn't riddled with spies, I'm a banana.
The NSA doesn't even need to crack Russian encryption: traffic analysis - who sends encrypted messages to whom - suffices.
Neither kind of source would ever be mentioned in public.
Same goes for Rossiya Today: the Russian secret services may well have evidence of US interference in Kiev but are never going to say what it is.
for fucks sake i havent said the US government actually believe what the Ukrainian junta are telling them . What ive stated is they are coming out with a definite state department line as regards what is happening in Ukraine . When pressed as to the source of their information that leads to this line theyve stated that its the Ukrainian government, and their word is simply being accepted as good enough . The Ukrainian junta is ...for anyone who isnt totally stupid...saying exactly what the white house wants them to say for propaganda purposes, and the state department are acting as their own mouthpiece . The point is the state department are saying theyve absolutely no intention of listening to or reapeating information from any alternative source that might be off message and presenting a different narrative .
sadly it appears i have to spell this obviousness out for the dimwitted, as unfortunately its myself who has to argue against some immense stupidity here
Last edited: