Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

UK courtroom to hear evidence against the official narrative of 9/11

OK it's real but it's not made out of matter, it's projected light etc. How the fuck do you attach something, let alone a missile to that?

So you missed the episodes (series 6 or 7 I think) where Arnie's light-bee made him out of solid light? :p

As you say though, you can't attach something to a hologram, the most you could do (with an awful lot of sophisticated tracking equipment) is project the hologram over/around the object.
 
how many different ways are there for a building to fall down?


2001986837.jpg


timber2-528x356.jpg



collapsing-building1.jpg



images



building-imploding-implode-collapse.jpg

At the WTC, all three buildings collapsed totally, and neatly into their own footprints.
 
so whats that then? two ways? into their footprints and not into their footprints?

fwiw looking at that video of wtc7 collapsing it didn't look much like the way the twin towers collapsed. the twin towers collapsed from the top with the upper floors crashing into the floors below, looks to me like wtc collapsed from the bottom but then what do i know? i'm not an expert (OR AM I???)
 
OK it's real but it's not made out of matter, it's projected light etc. How the fuck do you attach something, let alone a missile to that?

You paint nano thermite to the Steel foundations of the structure and detonate it at the same time as the hologram appears to hit the building.

Does this really need explaining?
 
it occurs to me that most modern conspiracy theories are like crap airport thriller sci fi stuff, like tom clancy having had a spliff
 
My money's on this case being sent to crown as the magistrates unable to impose a suitably harsh sentence. That or a conviction for contempt.
 
Has an architect ever come on here with a convincing explanation why Tower 7 fell without any contact from the planes?

Watching it, it falls in an identical manner to the other two buildings - without contact.
Yes.

Oddly it fell down after being hit by a massive chunk of one of the two main towers, which guess what, didn't fall in their own footprint.

Catch up Granddad. Or better yet, RTFT for once.
 
I'd love this to be a genuine 'laughed out of court' moment but sadly it'll probably just be a fine for non-payment and the judge refusing to listen to all the nonsense.
 
Has an architect ever come on here with a convincing explanation why Tower 7 fell without any contact from the planes?





Watching it, it falls in an identical manner to the other two buildings - without contact.

No. Architects don't do that sort of thing because they want people to believe their buildings won't collapse without some sort of calamity, instead of facing up to the reality that architects and builders can be crap.
 
Is there any chance we'll hear the outcome of this case? I'm guessing conspiraloonexcitingnews.com won't report it without spinning it to fuck (or, perhaps, at all), and afaik mainstream media outlets haven't shown any interest...?
 
i would have thought it should be fairly easy to see the truth of the matter via whatever the report on conspiraloonexcitingnews says tbh.
 
Biggest Horsham news right now is that Raymond Cusick, designer of the Daleks, has died.

The loons reckon 130 have turned out to support him Rooke.
 
Back
Top Bottom