Urban75 Home About Offline BrixtonBuzz Contact

UK courtroom to hear evidence against the official narrative of 9/11

Does one really need to be a metallurgist to understand nanothermic residue? Surely you can just google some info on it and voila, you're an expert.

Or you can recall what you were taught about the thermite reaction at school, and realise that nano-thermite only differs in the size of the particulates that make up the thermite, and the reactivity consequent to the particle size. All the rest (the ddifferent "cocktails" of metals and metal oxides etc) have all been tried and tested in ordinary thermites. :)
 
Wonder what will happen when the truthers finally convince us the powerful are running the world? :( Will they take a holiday, get round to doing all those little jobs round the house? Pay their TV licence?
 
Or you can recall what you were taught about the thermite reaction at school, and realise that nano-thermite only differs in the size of the particulates that make up the thermite, and the reactivity consequent to the particle size. All the rest (the ddifferent "cocktails" of metals and metal oxides etc) have all been tried and tested in ordinary thermites. :)

You've got a good memory. I can barely remember how to operate a bunsen burner.
 
I think people are missing something even bigger here. There were traces of uranium in the twin-towers wreckage. Bugger nano-thermite it was a nuclear strike.
 
You've got a good memory. I can barely remember how to operate a bunsen burner.
I've got good long-term memory (except for my heavy-drinking years between about '84-'89, where a lot of stuff is "blurry" :) ). My short-term memory is pretty shite, though. I'm currently being examined at a memory disorders clinic, it's got so bad.
 
Wonder what will happen when the truthers finally convince us the powerful are running the world? :( Will they take a holiday, get round to doing all those little jobs round the house? Pay their TV licence?

You know they'll just find something new to be paranoid about. :)
 
tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif
tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif
tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif

tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif
tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif
tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif

tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif
tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif
tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif

tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif
tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif
tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif

tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif
tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif
tumblr_maw38ixu1W1rgzq07o1_500.gif



Hope the above helps.

stop that.
 
No. You're wrong. It was secret laser beam weapons. I read it here so it must be true:
http://www.serendipity.li/wot/bollyn1.htm

Pah I refute your stinking links and provide my own irrefutables.

http://norfidid.wordpress.com/part-1-of-4-were-nuclear-reactors-the-cause-of-the-wtc-destruction/

Perhaps it was the boiling clouds—black, grey, white, and especially “nuclear brown”—surrounding the World Trade Center’s 110-story North and South Towers (WTC 1, 2) that made the world conclude the two hijacked airliners crashing into the buildings on September 11, 2001 had dropped nuclear bombs in elevator shafts. After all, the dreaded “stem-and-mushroom” cloud was rising from WTC 1 looking remarkably like a South Pacific atom-bomb test. How could they not, especially those familiar with media visuals of tests since 1946? Or those aware of a volcano’s powerful energy fields disgorging lava, pyroclastic flows, and lahars?

The principal advocate for the theory that reactors were the primary causal agent that ultimately destroyed all seven WTC buildings is William Tahil, a British aerospace/technological consultant. He is the author of Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the World Trade Centre. He contends that 9/11 not only was the first nuclear attack against the United States, but “the world’s first nuclear controlled demolition.” [ii]

Which just shows how cunning those people hijacking the airliners were that they could crash into the buildings and while doing so drop nuclear bombs down the elevator shafts. There's precision and split-second timing for you. No wonder that's what the world concluded.

Please also note the huge number of technical references given in this article, and that it is a British aerospace/technological consultant who has uncovered it all. Who's going to argue with that??
 
Perhaps it was the boiling clouds—black, grey, white, and especially “nuclear brown”—surrounding the World Trade Center’s 110-story North and South Towers (WTC 1, 2) that made the world conclude the two hijacked airliners crashing into the buildings on September 11, 2001 had dropped nuclear bombs in elevator shafts. After all, the dreaded “stem-and-mushroom” cloud was rising from WTC 1 looking remarkably like a South Pacific atom-bomb test. How could they not, especially those familiar with media visuals of tests since 1946? Or those aware of a volcano’s powerful energy fields disgorging lava, pyroclastic flows, and lahars?

The principal advocate for the theory that reactors were the primary causal agent that ultimately destroyed all seven WTC buildings is William Tahil, a British aerospace/technological consultant. He is the author of Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the World Trade Centre. He contends that 9/11 not only was the first nuclear attack against the United States, but “the world’s first nuclear controlled demolition.” [ii]
OMFG :facepalm:
 
then how come there was no radiation at the scene and no people getting radiation sickness or melted bodies or any signs of a nuclear attack whatsoever :facepalm:
 
Why is it that they've not done any radioactivity tests there then answer me that? There have been NO photos of people going round with Geiger counters that tells you all you need to know.

Jazzz doesn't want to talk about this one.
 
Why is it that they've not done any radioactivity tests there then answer me that? There have been NO photos of people going round with Geiger counters that tells you all you need to know.

Jazzz doesn't want to talk about this one.

how can a hologram be radioactive anyway?
 
Scientists who are experts in the holographic projection field have confirmed that the planes that hit the WTC were in fact missiles surrounded by holograms made to look like planes.

Is Jazzz still going with the holograph thing?

If so, I now know 2 people who will swear that they saw first hand a real plane fly into the south tower. One of those people describes the scream of the engines moments before the impact. She says the noise made them look in another direction - towards the now smoking N.tower, and after the second impact she saw "at least 3 people fall onto the ground".

Are you saying that she's lying Jazzz?

Would you like me to ask her to discuss it with you here?

Have you EVER spoken to a genuine eyewitness of 9/11?

Have you any conception of the real life pain that you and your trolling friends are causing these people?
 
Have you EVER spoken to a genuine eyewitness of 9/11?
Yes I have.

You are possibly not aware that many of the victim's families are leading the 9/11 truth movement. Here is their movie:



I have never endorsed a 'holographic planes' theory for 9/11.
 
You are possibly not aware that many of the victim's families are leading the 9/11 truth movement.

Do you think that may be because charlatans like you have mercilessly preyed on their insecurities and vulnerabilities having lost loved ones, to batter them with your agenda whilst they're at their lowest ebb?

Shame on you.

Seriously.

Fucking shame on you. :mad:
 
Back
Top Bottom