PursuedByBears
Go stick your head in a pig
It is bollocks though.
your question's shit.And no answer to my rather straightforward question.
i don't think any institution, be it in the public or private sector, gives refunds on the basis of the transaction being commercial.Should students get a refund for cancelled lectures/contact time because Education has been turned into a commercial transaction?
The justification for making students pay fees was that compared with others their future earnings would be higher.that's utter bollocks. 'the debate has been about fees relating to future earnings'? tosh. fees bear no relation to future earnings. do come back when you have an iota of an inkling of what you're on about.
You probably need to reconsider your sources and/or question their mathematical ability. Looking at the timetable of a science course in a (supposed) top tier UK university it would be hard to argue that a student is ‘paying’ much more than £20 per lecture/tutorial - a basic calculation that doesn’t even account for the cost to the establishment of laboratory time, equipment and facilities, which would pull that price down even further (just on full time hours alone your claim makes no sense).I heard that given the 9000 pounds a year, on one calculation each student is paying upwards of 100 pounds per lecture or tutorial.
Are you suggesting that contact with lecturers doesn't matter?It is bollocks though.
so you're rowing back from your earlier position that 'the debate has been about fees relating to future earnings'. i don't think you know what you mean about this future relationship either, you're all over the shop.The justification for making students pay fees was that compared with others their future earnings would be higher.
Whether there is a future relationship between the two in reality is not the issue, it was the justification.
We all benefit from an educated society so it should be free for those it suits, but as we have the situation we have, should students get money back when the service doesn't deliver what they want and need?
My 'claim' was what I had heard. The exact figure is clear!y debatable.You probably need to reconsider your sources and/or question their mathematical ability. Looking at the timetable of a science course in a (supposed) top tier UK university it would be hard to argue that a student is ‘paying’ much more than £20 per lecture/tutorial - a basic calculation that doesn’t even account for the cost to the establishment of laboratory time, equipment and facilities, which would pull that price down even further (just on full time hours alone your claim makes no sense).
do you have a source for this claim? yes or no.My 'claim' was what I had heard. The exact figure is clear!y debatable.
Are you suggesting that a student in their fees are paying for all the other stuff but the contact time with lecturers comes free?
It was on the wireless and I recalled it.do you have a source for this claim? yes or no.
Can you read?My 'claim' was what I had heard. The exact figure is clear!y debatable.
Are you suggesting that a student in their fees are paying for all the other stuff but the contact time with lecturers comes free?
yeh. do you believe everything you hear?It was on the wireless and I recalled it.
Anyway I have to go out now.
I feel like Basil Fawlty, just wanting to get one dig in before the police drag the fraudster off...Agreed, can we all just ignore the idiot.
tbh what students should do at a time like this is take advantage of the extra reading time to do that bit of research they've been putting off. when i was doing my first degree, history, we were told we should be reading 40 hours a week or so. i don't imagine anyone did that amount of research, but in retrospect i wish i had.I feel like Basil Fawlty, just wanting to get one dig in before the police drag the fraudster off...
Well Philosophical, don't you see yourself as some sort of socialist/opponent of neo-liberalism - as seen on the brexit thread you stunk up? How do you think giving students refunds will affect strikers? Won't management go in harder with regard to docking pay? How will it affect staff more generally in a targets driven consumerist environment? If you start giving refunds for cancelled lectures, don't you then have to start giving them for poor student module evaluations? Doesn't it encourage students who fail to get a 2(I) to make a claim? Who wins/loses from this process?
I feel like Basil Fawlty, just wanting to get one dig in before the police drag the fraudster off...
Well Philosophical, don't you see yourself as some sort of socialist/trade unionist/opponent of neo-liberalism - as seen on the brexit thread you stunk up? How do you think giving students refunds will affect strikers? Won't management go in harder with regard to docking pay? How will it affect staff more generally in a targets driven consumerist environment? If you start giving refunds for cancelled lectures, don't you then have to start giving them for poor student module evaluations? Doesn't it encourage students who fail to get a 2(I) to make a claim? Who wins/loses from this process?
That bit is very strange, like you say it's barely feasible. And goes against what the union has been saying about re-scheduling lectures.wow, rescheduling missed teaching as a priority? apart from the fact for most institutions running at maximum capacity for teaching in the timetable already that's impossible, that really is a fucking kick in the teeth from the union
It reads more like face-saving pabulum to me. We are "encouraged" to reschedule missed lectures, but even so, disruption will still only be "minimised".That bit is very strange, like you say it's barely feasible. And goes against what the union has been saying about re-scheduling lectures.
Looks like an agreement of sorts may have been reached. UCU HEC meeting tomorrow to decide whether or not to approve it:
https://t.co/fbiRLgoqoN
(Deal getting widely panned on twitter).