In the R4 report I linked to above he directly says that wording was used, could be lying but it would be bloody stupid to do so. Of course the full context isn't known but some of the statements from the university are very, very dodgy.But the interesting bit to me is whether the university itself has simply absorbed the notion that the research might be 'politically incorrect' (if that's was the actual wording used).
All they have is what the guy who's had his research bid turned down says. Smells a bit fishy to me.
It's an actual PC gone mad story ffs. I don't think I've ever seen one which didn't turn out to be bollocks (or at least much more complex than at first glance)
To be fair, Christmas did get banned.It's an actual PC gone mad story ffs. I don't think I've ever seen one which didn't turn out to be bollocks (or at least much more complex than at first glance)
Caspian, who has left the field of gender counselling, is prepared to be the whistleblower. “We are seeing,” he says, “what Jung called a ‘collective complex’.” He compares this mass hysteria about being trapped in the wrong body to the “glass delusion”, an odd medieval phenomenon where people believed they were made of glass and might shatter. Other clinicians mention the 1990s faux scandals of satanic ritual abuse and false memory syndrome. But unlike them, gender anxiety is supercharged by the internet.
That is not to say any experts I’ve met dispute the existence of gender dysphoria or the need for better treatment and social tolerance of trans people. But they feel what they call the “trans trend” needs analysing as a cultural phenomenon as much as a medical one. “St Paul’s School suddenly has a lot of non-binary girls,” said one child gender expert, “but when I was growing up, that’s where all the anorexics went.”
There is no blood test or pathogen to diagnose you as trans; it is solely a matter of interpreting human experience. With children, the dominant interpretation that is currently shouting down all others is that, say, a boy who enjoys “female” toys or clothes must really be a girl.
Article here that gives some background as to where the psychotherapist is coming from.
The article goes into that. It's a problem faced surrounding many psychiatric disorders and the DSM, the 'bible' of many psychiatrists, whose diagnostic criteria can change drastically over time (or, in the case of homosexuality, disappear entirely). So the DSM has changed its diagnostic criteria, insisting that 'desire to be or insisting that you are the other sex' is essential to a diagnosis, but old studies were done using the old criteria. It's the old junk in-junk out argument.I started to read the above article (thank you, Claire de Lune) but stopped in confusion after reading that the totals of childrens desisting transition did not stack up 'because they were not trans to begin with'...and at this point, my brain collapsed since it seems we are still awash in misconceptions, assumptions, misidentifications. Obviously, still early days and I am uncomfortably reminded of another syndrome which was (claimed) to be internet driven - the strange case of Morgellons. Presumably, a child does not wake up one day and insist that they have issues with gender assignment (my youngest went through a three year stage of dressing in female (?) clothing, playing only with other girls and showing a huge sensitivity towards the feel of various fabrics, styles of clothing, colours and scents...as well as expressing an alarming range of tics, grunts, twitches) but I admit to being adrift...and also needing to examine some of the varying and inconsistent demands made by children at various stages of their social, emotional and physical development.
Much as I like Simon Baron-Cohen, there are big problems with his 'extreme male' model of autism. We're floundering with most of this stuff really, aren't we.There is also the autism angle.
The Link Between Autism and Trans Identity
Autism and (trans)gender: dysphoria, and gender fluidity in ASD
There is more info available with some reports also, some are pretty biased though.
Much as I like Simon Baron-Cohen, there are big problems with his 'extreme male' model of autism. We're floundering with most of this stuff really, aren't we.
Always?He has a point though, it is always the male autists that are the most destructive.
Always?
More males are destructive than females full stop. Just take a peek at the prison populations. Suicides. Homeless. Males fuck up more than females in lots of ways. We don't have good answers for why.
I dunno. I'll dig out some links when I have time. I was attracted by Baron-Cohen's idea when I first read about it, but for various reasons I now don't think it really stands up. Its basic assumptions - that there exist 'male traits' and 'female traits' like systematising or empathising - are highly questionable and not really backed up by the data, in fact there is a growing body of data saying that this really isn't true.I agree, maybe all males are autistic in varying ways, I know I am, getting my nuts cut off helped that a bit.
Also follow the money, The Tavistock and Portman NHS Foundation Trust
What do you mean by this?
NHS budget is about £131 billion in 2017.
Getting the loose change is a huge amount in reality, I should have posted this link instead, Home - Clinic for Dissociative Studies
But the initial place does have an agenda also.
What is that agenda?
Are you suggesting that the Tavistock clinic in London had something to do with this man's research proposal being turned down because a study on people who want to reverse their transition would be bad for their funding? That sounds .. a bit far fetched.More funding. You seem to be very defensive about a trust which by nature is there to enrich people.
Are you suggesting that the Tavistock clinic in London had something to do with this man's research proposal being turned down because a study on people who want to reverse their transition would be bad for their funding? That sounds .. a bit far fetched.
More funding. You seem to be very defensive about a trust which by nature is there to enrich people.
What then was your point snadge? You mentioned other researchers having their funding cut who wanted to do similar studies and then you said to follow the money to the Tavistock.
I'm following up on some investigations atm, it looks like Tavistock are looking for some of that wedge, they are late to the show and seem to be taking an unique approach to the transgender gravy train, for such a small proportion of society, there seems to be an inordinate amount of wonga available.