The Flying Pig
Well-Known Member
WATCH: Trans Activist Men Attack, Beat Dissenting 60-Year-Old Woman
WTF is going on here?
WTF is going on here?
No thanks. Explain or go away.
Christ what a dull and shit thread title/first post.
At least put some fucking effort in The Flying Pig, you lazy cunt.
You're another lazy cunt. Fuck off making shit up. Again.Feminists being physically attacked is acceptable? Um, ok.
Click here and you'll see what I mean!Trans activists have attacked feminists by the looks of things. It's a first so hardly warrants a 'no thanks'.
You're another lazy cunt. Fuck off making shit up. Again.
Click here and you'll see what I mean!
I'm clearly being too cryptic. See post 4.See above reply.
It's no less acceptable than anyone else being beaten up. That's quite an important bit of feminism, TBH. And sixty is middle aged. It's a decade younger than Trump, and I don't think he's so frail as not to be fair game in a street fight.Feminists being physically attacked is acceptable? Um, ok.
It's no less acceptable than anyone else being beaten up. That's quite an important bit of feminism, TBH. And sixty is middle aged. It's a decade younger than Trump, and I don't think he's so frail as not to be fair game in a street fight.
And reading her fb post, if those kind of views are typical for her, then I can see why people might be a bit fucked off with her. Like, if you're a rabid anti-immigration type and you turn up to that place in Croydon where they process people's leave to remain, filming people and mouthing off about immigration... you can't be too shocked if you get a slap.
Oh look, a complete misrepresentation, quelle surprise.So we've now shifted towards treating feminists we don't agree with as fascists. What a mess is all I can say. Oh, and good luck. Identity politics continues to unravel.
Oh look, a complete misrepresentation, quelle surprise.
Umm. Not everyone who is anti immigration is a fascist. I think it's not bad for a rough analogy. This women and many like her (a small minority of feminists, btw) look at some of the most vulnerable people in society and tell them that "you can't join our club". No matter how urgent it is, no matter the risk to the trans woman's mental health, they build a wall around "being a woman" and leave people to suffer on the other side.So we've now shifted towards treating feminists we don't agree with as fascists. What a mess is all I can say. Oh, and good luck. Identity politics continues to unravel.
That's a different take to a moment ago. There is nothing wrong with protesting against a meeting promoting a reactionary agenda.We disagree yet we don't picket each other's events. What a mess. Hopefully this is where the regressive left finally eats itself.
Physical attacks are bad, but a risk you take in any kind of public activism.I find the issue to be complex. I find myself nodding to both sides of the argument whenever they're given. Obviously it's emotive, hence this. But now we're entering a situation where feminists don't mind feminist meetings being attacked if they're the wrong kind of feminist.
Physical attacks are bad, but a risk you take in any kind of public activism.
The meeting wasn't attacked.I find the issue to be complex. I find myself nodding to both sides of the argument whenever they're given. Obviously it's emotive, hence this. But now we're entering a situation where feminists don't mind feminist meetings being attacked if they're the wrong kind of feminist.
Just because you're 'left' (and I'm not sure that the organisers would describe themselves thus) doesn't absolve you if you promote a bigoted agenda. No doubt many people attending were quite genuine and just wanted to find out more about the issues, but that isn't true of the organisers.Of course. But what we're discussing here is a case of the left attacking the left. Or maybe not. I'm not entirely sure where either side stands on economic issues and 'left' is now a byword for social justice.
Just because you're 'left' (and I'm not sure that the organisers would describe themselves thus) doesn't absolve you if you promote a bigoted agenda. No doubt many people attending were quite genuine and just wanted to find out more about the issues, but that isn't true of the organisers.
The meeting wasn't attacked.
What was I arguing a decade ago?It's funny though how you weren't arguing their theories were bigoted a decade ago.
No, it's a large distinction. The meeting was protested against. Are you saying that is invalid?Pedant.