i entirely agree and would like to subscribve to your newsletter or pamphlet.danny la rouge said:OK, here's the thing: what's good about Dr Who is that it's a family programme; it's for kids, but there's stuff there for adults to appreciate, too. Like Shrek. But take it away from that and make it only for adults and it loses too much; it becomes a pretty naff programme. Instead of Shrek you've got OTT, the Tiswas spin off that made the same mistake.
Oh dear.
Loki said:A few actors nicked from Doctor Who too, apart from Cap'n Jack. The new recruit, the woman PC, played the telepathic scullery maid in the Charles Dickens episode.
fudgefactorfive said:is it just me or is everything Russel T Davies does riddled with a sense of nepotism?
also, exactly what definition of "camp" are people using, especially the ones who thought Torchwood was "camp"? What was camp about it? Camp's a bit more nuanced than just meaning "silly and cheap" imo ....
fudgefactorfive said:is it just me or is everything Russel T Davies does riddled with a sense of nepotism?
Brockway said:It's just you.
Give us some examples of his nepotism. I'm curious.
I have just watched eps 1 and 3 back to back. (Didnt record 2 ) and I thought it was tv fluff. Good expression btw! I dont watch much tv and wanted to check this out after all the hype.Brockway said:Well that's the problem for a lot of people I reckon. The hype. I can image you sitting there arms folded, saying: "Come on then, impress me!" If you'd have just come across it one evening without knowing anything about it you might have thought it was an enjoyable piece of televisual fluff.
belboid said:Most odd. I thought last nights was pretty crap, daft storyline that didn't really make any sense. Tho Gwen is doing well in the killing people stakes
It is derived from and inhabits the same universe as Doctor Who so of course it's derivative. I don't agree on the dull stakes, I watched episode 2 last nite (recorded) I thought it was quite alright.gnoriac said:Found it seriously dull and derivative
Agreed. BSG is far better than this drivel (ooh bloody hell, Jones the Steam is a bloody martian love!). That show actually has a story, acting, pacing, drama, pathos and quality written all over it. This is the usual beeb treatment of genre fiction - terrible.Echo Base said:Give me Battlestar Galactica any day of the week over this....
llantwit said:I'm surprised there are so many who think it's just shit.
Jack is the worst thing about this, it's true. He's just a bit too perfect-looking and bit too shit as an actor to carry off the quirky alien thing. He might develop a bit - the more we get to know about his character the more dark bits seep through - he doesn't sleep, he might be lonely, etc (a bit of Angel thrown into the mix there maybe?). He doesn't have the oddness or acting range of the two doctors so far, though. He worked OK as a foil to Chrisopher Ecclestone and Billy, but can't carry the show on his own.
Thank god for Gwen, then! Who, it seems to me, is just great. A really good TV presence and lovely eye candy, and Welsh to boot. What more could one ask!?
I quite like Ianto - a bit 'men in black'. The other two in the team are a bit shite, although not offensive in any way (the Owen guy was pretty good in the adaptation of Bleak House - but maybe he's too much of a character actor to play it straight in a role like this).
The story-lines have been fair-enough value in my book - quite liked episode three. Some good X-Filesey stuff never goes amiss. And I do enjoy location spottingin Cardiff. It's quite good that it's based in a small british city - adds to a strange sense of crumminess and fallibility about the whole production (despite it's expensive aerial shots, etc.) that I think is really endearing.
On the whole - keep it coming.
llantwit said:Yeah, good to get the Splott joke in there!
The accents don't bother me, as everyone knows, the valleys accent is superior in tone and quality to the Cardiff one anyway.